• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

The NFL does not test players for recreational drugs during the season

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
30,606
The NFL does not test players for recreational drugs during the season

By Dom Cosentino/NJ.com
Follow on Twitter
on February 05, 2014 at 6:47 PM, updated February 05, 2014 at 7:41 PM

Now that Jets cornerback Antonio Cromartie told an interviewer the NFL needs to re-think its ban on marijuana because "players are going to do it anyway," it's important to understand what Cromartie was really saying: That, well, players are going to smoke weed anyway, be it for recreational purposes or to manage the extraordinary pain the game inflicts on their bodies.

The league's decision to test for marijuana dates to a time when the public was far less accepting of its use than it is today.

But how do players continue to smoke weed if the NFL tests for it? That's easy: For players who have not previously tested positive or been arrested on drug-related charges, the league's random testing for what it calls "substances of abuse" only takes place for approximately four months out of the year, all of it during the offseason.

According to the league's drug policy, that testing only happens between April 20 and Aug. 9, though players signed or acquired after Aug. 9 can be tested later than that if they haven't been already. In addition, rookies and any players not under contract with a team at the end of the prior season are also subject to pre-employment testing.

The policy goes on to identify exactly which drugs it characterizes as "substances of abuse" and are subject to testing:

• Cocaine
• Marijuana
• "Amphetamines and its analogs"
• Opiates ("total morphine and codeine")
• Opioids ("hydrocodone, oxycodone")
• PCP
• "MDMA and its analogues"

The "substances of abuse" testing should not be confused with the testing for performance-enhancing drugs. As NFL spokesman Greg Aiello explained to MLive.com in 2012:

"Year-round random testing takes place in the steroids program, not the substance abuse program. If a player is in the substance abuse program, he is subject to frequent testing as determined by the medical professionals of the program. If he's not in the program, he takes an annual drug screen prior to the season."
The reason for this? Aiello again, also via MLive.com:

"Substance abuse is treated as a medical matter. Performance enhancing drugs are a competitive matter."
A failed test or a "behavior" issue such as a drug-related arrest will put a player into Stage One of the league's intervention program. There is no discipline such as a suspension in Stage One; a player is instead subject to additional testing and a treatment program at the discretion of the league's medical director.

It is then up to the medical director to determine whether a player advances to Stage Two of the program, even if the player has not successfully completed Stage One. Discipline can be meted out in Stage Two—a violation for a player in Stage Two who has completed Stage One is a fine of up to four games' pay; a violation for a player in Stage two who has not completed Stage One is a four-game suspension.

A second positive test in Stage Two or two instances of failure to cooperate with the program, or one positive test plus one instance of failure to cooperate will put a player in Stage Three, where he must remain for the rest of his career and be subject to random, unannounced testing. Failure to cooperate or a positive test in Stage Three will result in a one-year banishment.

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has said he is open to having the league allow marijuana use for medical purposes. He also said the league has no plans to remove weed from its list of banned substances.

http://www.nj.com/jets/index.ssf/20...for_recreational_drugs_during_the_season.html
 
I'm sure a good number of NFL players know this system well enough to be able to smoke weed for most of the year...the central issue I see is just the extreme risk the players take relative to their livelihoods. Even for rookies, half-million salaries are on the line, and if you've made it this far and have actually been acquired by a team, it'd be a damn shame to throw all that money away.

But yeah, even though the NFL is pretty deservedly labeled as 'anti-intellectual' the majority of the time, it will be interesting to see what happens with the league and how they handle good old Mary Jane in the coming years...not only do a lot of players come from backgrounds where they knew people who would've smoked weed (it's epidemic in college football programs, apparently), but like many people can tell, all the physical work and effort, and subsequent injuries, that the players put in and experience through playing in the NFL is fucking staggering...300 lb. muscular behemoths are out there blocking and pushing on each other for hours at a time week in and week out. Just for the physical pain itself, weed makes a lot of sense.

It'll also be interesting if Goodell succumbs and starts doing weed testing on a state-by-state legality basis. If that was the case, then both of the teams that appeared in the Super Bowl (from Colorado and Washington) would be able to smoke weed freely all year...
 
Why shouldn't players be allowed to smoke grass if its legal where they live. No instead the league wants them to use the traditional opiate, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen.. all of which come with their own set of problems. If I were a player that wished to use marijuana to aid me with the pain issues of being a pro athlete in a contact sport and lived in a place where it was legal I would not be happy.
 
Pro athletes also have extremely low body fat, so i'm pretty sure weed doesn't stay in their systems for long.
 
This is actually starting to become quite a debate on ESPN with current/former players on both sides of the issue...not surprisingly, it's generally the older (and usually white, but not always) players who are against weed, while the younger/current NFL players are way more realistic.

Been hearing numbers that around 50-60% of NFL players smoke though...yeah, when you get into these type of majority numbers, the NFL is being forced to at least look into this. A more conservative estimate was at least a third of active players in the national football league smoke. (Source here is ESPN on the TV).

The twist to this discussion in the NFL is how concussions and long-term brain damage/neurological issues have been at the forefront of discussions about football for a few months/years now. The main detractors to weed being used in the NFL (based on little to no evidence) claim that weed is just further fucking up players' brains. Sigh - if weed poses any 'danger' to the brain, if you can even call it that, it would only be with teenagers to young adults, whose brains are still developing, not adult men who are hitting each other so hard that their brains literally rattle around their skulls.
 
Last edited:
If the NFL allows their players to smoke, it will help the legalization movement in all states in the future.
 
when I played college football, plenty of players used drugs and steroids. I don't know if the system has changed much since then, but what would happen was there would be two "totally random" drug tests during the season. about half the team would get tested during a time period close to the beginning of the season, and then another random half would get tested close to the season. there was no rhyme or reason to the picking, supposedly, meaning that just because you got tested in the first half didn't mean you were going to (or not going to) get tested in the latter half

however, coaches did a pretty good job of either not testing the players they thought were a little more inclined to substances than the players who were probably clean. and if they did a swell job of letting the players know they were going to probably be tested when the testing times came (for example, yours truly was never tested :))

let the players get high, if only to deal with the incredulous amount of damage playing a contact sport of this caliber brings to one's body
 
Top