when did i say falcons were gonna win superbowl? also falcons > rams and bills (easily). and vikings winning the superbowl wouldnt shock the world. theyre seen as one of the top teams in the league atm.
panthers and @ raiders are great wins imo. and bucs was a division game plus falcons did so many penalties they really didnt give themselves a chance.
it's like why nobody thinks rams are better than seahawks despite rams beating them a lot.
just because i said falcons won't win superbowl doesn't mean i heard you say they were going to
i was simply starting a narrative
vikings would shock the world considering by week 2 they lost their starting qb(who imo isn't really that good) and future HoF RB
like always being youngest team in NFL, they're also always top 3 in penalties so i don't want to hear about a few flags ruining things
every time tavon has a chance to return a punt it results in a holding 9/10 times, they hit the qb late about twice a week, always on 3rd down, robert quinn is held almost every play yet opposing LT might get called for it once
panthers and raiders are having shitty years defensiely,but to support your cause, maybe it's because they both had to play atl?
but ATL does not have play makers on defense and i wouldn't trust them with two minutes left down by 4 with 80 yards to go
all 3 of rams wins were thanks to their def not allowing their opponents to march down field to score game winning TDs under 2 mins, all 3 teams are pretty strong on offense too(sea, TB and AZ) and all 3 teams go within rams terrotory. rams defense excels in the redzone, to the point that don't mind teams getting there in crunch time, defense is just too strong on DL, mean at LB and physical in the secondary....in their tampa win they actually only rushed 3 as 300+lb DT michael brokers dropped back in overage...greg williams knows more tricks than any NFC south DC, or even HC
in short(it's just a photo not a rant, you can expect me taking this stance when falcons arrive in LA later this season and perhaps post season: