• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Taxi driver charged with delivering wine to people drinking in parks in 'sly-grogging

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
Taxi driver charged with delivering wine to people drinking in parks in 'sly-grogging operation'

Man was allegedly delivering bottles of wine to people in a Kununurra park
The driver was allegedly selling wine for five times retail price
Police found five bottles of wine and a kilogram of cannabis in his house
Police charged the 67-year-old man with the unauthorised sale of alcohol

2E90A5B300000578-3323680-image-a-16_1447851705257.jpg


A taxi driver who was who was allegedly running an alcohol delivery operation on the job has been charged by police.
Police received reports the taxi driver, 67, had been delivering bottles of wine to people in a park in the Kimberley town of Kununurra in northern WA.
Police charged the man with the unauthorised sale of alcohol. They allege he was selling the bottles of chardonnay at five times the retail price, a practice known locally as 'sly-grogging', reports ABC.

Senior Sergeant Steve Principe said police were alerted after a man was spotted leaving a house with a chiller bag on Tuesday.
'It will be alleged the alcohol was being sold from the taxi, which is extremely disappointing ... you put a bit of trust in that kind of service and expect them to operate above board,' Senior Sergeant Principe said.

Police allegedly found six bottles of wine and documents suggesting they were being sold by the driver in his taxi. When they searched the driver's house, they allegedly found almost a kilogram of cannabis.
A man, 62, who also lived at the residence and works for the same taxi company, was charged with possession of cannabis with intent to sell or supply.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...wine-people-drinking-parks.html#ixzz3rskeBxJq
 
Five times retail price... so a 10 dollar bottle of wine becomes 50? I somehow doubt it was that high and i get the charge and the fact its a crime but really

'It will be alleged the alcohol was being sold from the taxi, which is extremely disappointing ... you put a bit of trust in that kind of service and expect them to operate above board,' Senior Sergeant Principe said.

I was unaware that selling alcohol to adults was a massive moral violation in a state that isnt dry.
 
Yet another case of Australians paying inflated prices for drugs ...
 
Some other info on the area -

Indigenous health: No alcohol debit card backed by Noel Pearson divides Kununurra

1443083329768.jpg


In the east Kimberley town of Kununurra, it is not difficult to find a drink. Hotel Kununurra is advertised by a massive, glowing XXXX GOLD sign and, provided it is between midday and 8pm, and not a Sunday, two bottle shops do swift trade.

The northern West Australian regional centre of 7000 is also racked by high alcoholism, drug use and alcohol-related violence rates among its large Aboriginal population. At between 51 per cent and 63 per cent, Indigenous school attendance rates are among the lowest in the country and, come nightfall, groups of children find it safer to roam the streets than head to their alcohol-affected homes. So poor are some socioeconomic parameters in the remote community that it ranks poorly on a number of the United Nations' new global Sustainable Development Goals, due to be ratified under the leadership of Ban Ki-moon in New York at the end of the month.

"We think that we've got about 40 per cent of our people in a crisis situation. We've got to do something like this to break this cycle of poverty," said Ian Trust, who is leading a group of local Aboriginal elders in pushing for implementation of the Andrew Forrest and Noel Pearson-backed healthy welfare card locally termed the Restricted Debit Card because, according to Mr Trust, "there is no such thing as healthy welfare".

He and other members of east Kimberley's Empowered Communities group met with former Prime Minister Tony Abbott 2½ weeks ago and formally asked if the town could be a trial site for the radical – and blunt – economic instrument.

Hoped to be in place by March, the card would be compulsory for everyone on welfare besides aged pensioners, and directs 80 per cent of an individual's welfare payments into a secured account that cannot be used to buy alcohol or for gambling. A local Indigenous panel would assess each individual's behaviour, rolling the restricted amount back to lower percentages if key targets, such as children's school attendance rates and searching for employment, are met.
Ceduna in South Australia last week signed up for the "almost cashless" card and is expected to begin a trial in February.

But Kununurra elder Ted Carlton, who makes no bones of his family's troubles with alcohol, is wary of the plan, which he sees as coming from people who have no experience of the realities of living on welfare.
"Those people were never in this position before, they don't know how hard it is for Aboriginal people who have got no job and have no English and no education. They are finding it hard to survive," said the former chairman of MG Corporation, which controls the majority of native title benefits in the region.

"Penalising people is not the right way. We need more education. I think a lot of people are taking shortcuts and are just penalising people the way they see fit – they don't really know about the impacts."
There is no evidence that the new card will have any positive effect on communities, said the Australian National University's Jon Altman, who has researched economy in remote Aboriginal communities for over 40 years. The BasicsCard, widely criticised as a poor piece of policy that "treats adults as children", is already opt-in in Kununurra and bans users from gambling and buying alcohol, cigarettes and porn.

"The debit card is the BasicsCard on steroids. The assumption in all this from the start is that people on welfare have more of a problem with alcohol than those in work," said Professor Altman.
​He said the global critique of instruments such as the debit card is that "they target vulnerable people rather than seeing certain problems in society, such as addictions to alcohol and gambling, as things that need to be addressed, rich or poor".
He pointed out that the card is likely to cost about $5000 per person, per year.

"Questions that ultimately need to be asked in remote communities are: Could that money be used to subsidise healthy food, for example, or used more productively to address drinking issues?" he said.
A report by Peter D'Abbs of the Menzies School of Health Research in September's Drug and Alcohol Review argues how damaging top-down alcohol policies have been in the Northern Territory, though Mr Trust believes that the debit card's advantage is that it approaches Kununurra's problems from within the community.

"The difference with this whole process is that it is led by Aboriginal people saying now it's time to get up and do something," Mr Trust said.
He does not have the option not to try something radical, he suggested.

"Some of this stuff, you've just got to go and try it," he said. "If there's no real spirit in it or no real drive from the community to make it happen, it'll probably never work."
For Mr Carlton, however, solutions must evolve around more than monetary-based instruments in a historically-charged landscape of contradiction and shifting politics.
"I don't like what's going on in the Aboriginal community, too," he said. "I don't like all the fighting and all the domestic violence and all the kids missing school but I know deep inside me there must be another way instead of all this debit card business to fix the problem."

A spitting distance from the bottle shops, TAB outlet and dozens of government service providers, the hot Kimberley sun beats down on groups of locals who rest under trees around the town's central shopping area.
One, an Aboriginal father and unemployed construction worker who asked not to be named, said that while he had seen the BasicsCard do some good, he worries the new debit card will only add to the marginalisation of first Australians on welfare.
"Why do we need key cards?" he asked. "White people drink, too, they inject. White people gamble."

http://www.smh.com.au/national/indi...earson-divides-kununurra-20150911-gjks0l.html
 
In Appalachia in the U.S., people on welfare buy 30 or 40 cases of soda with their monthly food stamps, sell it to another retailer for 50 cents on the dollar, and then buy their drugs, booze, smokes, etc. Same kind of thing will no doubt happen there.
 
^ Good read.

More from the cops in the same region getting hammered on FB for busting a woman with 50 grams of weed, there are hundreds of comments and I could only see a couple that were supporting the bust. -

30kekiw.png


dre5hs.png
 
potato heads.....lol!

Yeah I love the look on the cops faces. Its like they are taken right out of miami vice.
 
yeah LOL at the cops trying to look hard.

also if I didn't say this already, "sly-grogging" ... aussies have some of the best idiomatic slang
 
I always considered sly grogging when I was drinking at church.....gotta find the lord somehow!
 
Kimberley cops remove Facebook post bragging of 'granny' pot bust

1448441525375.jpg


Kimberley police have pulled down a Facebook post boasting of a 50-gram cannabis bust on a 57-year-old woman in Halls Creek, after a heated online backlash.
The post, which had attracted more than 200 comments by the time it was pulled down, featured a photo of two officers holding up bags of cannabis with the text: "50 grams of cannabis seized. 57yr old female charged with intent to sell or supply. #notolerance #drugsarebad. #fb".

The post was shared by online marijuana legalisation activist groups across the country, who descended on the Kimberley police page with comments protesting against the charges and claiming the cannabis was for medicinal purposes.
There was a similar reaction on Twitter, where people queried if the officers "had real work to do" and suggested they had seized an "average medicinal supply".

But police said the removal of the Facebook post had nothing to do with the backlash about the relatively small marijuana bust and was the result of an inability to moderate comments.
After the Facebook post was deleted, some of those passionate about the issue took to commenting on the page's other posts, with one commenter stating on a post showing rocks thrown through police vehicle windows;

"Hey great job deleting all of the comments on the last post because they clearly show that society's values no longer reflect the laws you are enforcing. Stop censoring us and breaking into old ladies homes to steal their medicine. Start actually serving and protecting, then maybe the people won't feel like throwing rocks at your cars."
That comment was subsequently deleted as well.

Another commenter scorned the destruction of property, but offered some advice.
"Not saying this is ok but maybe if you stopped arresting grandmother's [sic] for having 50 grams of dried flowers community relations might be a bit better."

One Facebook commenter on a later post offered: "This is the only police social media page in Australia that I've seen censor comments, delete their own posts because they're unpopular, and block people for no good reason. Shame on you. That is absolutely no way to engage with the community or foster respect. Take a note from the metro police groups and learn to take feedback even if it isn't positive."

WA Police social media co-ordinator Adam Brower said it was not unusual for the police to pull down Facebook posts - especially marijuana-related posts.
"We find that all the time, and especially when we make marijuana related posts on there, we get people coming with some pretty angry comments," he said.

"We encourage healthy debate on our social media accounts, and to some extent we want the public to tell us what they like and what they don't like about the way we do things, but if it's not really generating constructive comments then we'll just take the post down."
Mr Brower explained that the WA Police didn't have time to moderate their comments sections "to the nth degree", so if comments started going in a certain direction it was usual for them to just pull down the whole post rather than individually remove particularly offensive comments.

"Even at a corporate level, if I get a marijuana posts across my desk I know that it's going to be trouble," he said.
"We always know it, but we'll post it anyway because you know, we've had a great result and we want to show that."
Mr Brower said a similar situation happened with police posts related to last week's motorised picnic tables.

"There were about 38,000 comments, and there was probably a 50/50 split between people saying it was just a bit of harmless fun, you know: 'Why are you going after these guys when we've got ISIS and much bigger problems to deal with?'" he said.
"At the other extreme you had people saying that it was public roads they were driving on and if they had gotten into a collision they could have seriously hurt someone.
"The thing that the public don't realise there are actually different people just doing their jobs. It's not the traffic patrol's job to go after ISIS."

http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/k...gging-of-granny-pot-bust-20151125-gl85bo.html
 
taking down the posts is just a bunch of bullshit. Maybe the cops should consider the backlash as popular opinion and maybe try to change the way they police people. In the states we no longer have "peace officers" we have a gang of unruly "badasses" thinking they are the only thing standing between a near utopia and utter bedlam and madness.

I think the police in america and australia should take a long hard look at how the police function in canada and maybe start taking a few notes.
 
That looks like really bad quality herb. Not all the herb in Australia is that bad, couldn't they have found better stuff? Or grown better stuff?
 
Top