AminoAcid said:
Amen. This is about the most epic adventure story ever written, and each new place Song Wukong and his companions pass through, they uncover some sort of interesting ethical, societal, or philosophical lesson. The real treasure they bring back is the wealth of experiences they have along the way, i.e. the journey itself, rather than just a bundle of old sutras.
I don't know why the Tale of Genji gets credit for the world's first novel; Journey to the East is one coherent work with a beginning, middle, and end, while the Tale of Genji is a rambling compilation of chick lit.
KamMoye said:
Paulo Coelho - The Alchemist
Daniel Keyes - Flowers for Algernon
Kahlil Gibran - The Prophet
Also co-sign the Herman Hesse and Philip K. Dick suggestions. Cool youtube clip for Dick fans: Matrix.
Never got much into sci-fi aside from Dick. I respect Heinlein, Herbert, Gibson, RAW, etc. but their work never grabbed me. The word I always felt was circuitous.
Funny you should say this. Philip K. Dick always gave me a very different (and better, IMO) feeling than most, especially most hard-boiled, English language sci-fi. Finally one day I put my finger on it: Dick's underlying worldview is like the movie Rashomon -- we each inhabit our own private universe, and it's hard to ever know what we can trust and how much (if any) of our private worlds are shared with others. In other words, Dick celebrates the subjective experience. In contrast, I find that most sci-fi of high repute tends to highlight the shared common human experience, and invites the reader to be more objective in assessing his/her place in the world.
Tangentially, I like the work of Kim Stanley Robinson for a similar reason. While much sci-fi of high merit tends to push a libertarian or even anarchist political vision, Robinson dares to push a progressivist agenda without coming off as hokey.
All of Paulo Coelho's work is pretty profound. His main characters all undergo massive changes in their sense of place in the world, that I think to some extent can carry over to the reader. That's real writing talent, if you ask me.
!!4iV4HF9R34g said:
I gotta say MDAO, His Dark Materials touched me like no other media before or since. I thought the message, despite Pullman's blatant advocacy of atheism, was more along the lines of 'You are in control'.
I also loved the sense of constant transcendance, of taboos and ideas and even realities.
More than anything, I guess this story just helped me accept that there isn't just one solid and real place for me to be, and that there is no fated destiny or will. There's only what you make.
The Northern Lights / The Golden Compass (the first book) was excellent. Just like the Matrix, there was no need for a trilogy -- volume one should have stood alone as a complete work. I find Pullman's imagination sputtered a bit when he described his imagined worlds in books 2 and 3.
What irks me on a thematic level about His Dark Materials is that his message (which you so accurately put) is actually Hermetic, and belonging to other Western occult and mystery traditions. Pullman seems to be suggesting that these systems of belief are compatible with what goes by the label of atheism today, and I don't think that's accurate at all.