I'm not into playing games
Okay.
but you need to make her want you.
Would you not describe that as a game?
You need to make her chase you a little bit.
Okay.
It's not about playing hard to get and all that.
You appear to lack internal consistency twice in the space of half a paragraph, do YOU even know what you're trying to say?
It's just that if you're always texting her and it's clear that you really want to be with her then she won't at any point be unsure on whether or not you like her.
And that's a problem because? I dunno, I'd rather know someone likes me, than be unsure if they like me, or if they in fact want shank me in the kidney.
You need to not talk to her unless she hits you up.
Now, what happens if she pursues this same strategy? Imagine you're driving down the highway, and there is an oncoming vehicle, and both of decide "I'm going to wait for the other person to take action to avoid this collision" and you both stick to that, what happens?
Don't reply to texts or answer calls right away.
It's impossible to do that anyway. At minimum, any information travelling between spatially separated points must take the time of flight for something moving at velocity C. What do you define as an acceptable, contrived (i.e. playing a game, which you advised not to) delay to use?
She needs to feel like you have your own life and you're off doing cool exciting things
Then do cool exciting things and tell her about them?
not waiting around for her to text you.
I had the neatest experience the other day! K, so I was riding in a LAV-25 armoured vehicle as part of a little exercise on base right? (cool and exciting imo) so anyways, Ms.G texts me, and like -holy shit- I texted her back while still doing my cool exciting thing! I had this deep insight that I was able to both use a cellphone and do something else AT THE SAME!!! I am now writing an article to publish in Nature. I expect I will win a Nobel prize in Physics for this profound insight on the nature of reality.
Don't tell her you want to be with her.
Of course not, people respond admirably to cold, stand offish behaviour.
don't be all goey and romantic.
Better yet, make an active effort to be as abrasive and yet dismissive towards her at the same time, she'll love it!
but we want men not boys.
As I recall, the only time those two words are at all distinguished in a concrete way is that boys are pre-pubescent. Are you making the obvious statement that the majority of women are not pedophiles? If not, elaborate on your hidden meaning so people who are not you can understand it.
And before we start dating someone the initial dating process needs to be exciting!
Let me get this straight: So, temporally, an exciting period of dating needs to occur before the process of dating begins. This seems to violate causality and to be self negating. How can you have an "initial DATING process" while not "DATING"? on the very basic assumption that 1=1, so should the word dating=dating. Do you mean something else? If so, what, and how the hell was anyone suppose to tell?
and what makes it exciting is not knowing whether the guy is the right guy or if he likes you too
Really? I find that knowing that Ms.G/Nova/Sophie like me, and then going to parties with them/having kinky sex/getting high, without worrying about putting a facade up, much more exiting. The party/kinky sex/high is exciting, knowing they like me makes it fun instead of stressful.
And you're not dating yet so it shouldn't be like a relationship!
Define dating and define relationship pls? Like I consider me and my army buddy Scott to have a relationship, i.e. "Me and my friend Scott have a great relationship." or me and my and my Dad "The relationship between me and my Dad is strained" Note abstract use like "Doctor/patient relationship" or even "The relationship between a photon's wavelength and it's energy level is Energy=([Planck constant*speed of light] divided by[wavelength]) and is called "The Planck RELATION" Being someone's friend IS, by any meaningful measure, a RELATIONSHIP, and thus, to say that a relationship should not be like a relationship can be formalized as A NOT A. A statement which makes no sense and can be considered patent nonsense. Nothing can imply it's own negation.
That means you shouldn't talk every day or see each other every day or be clingy with each other or anything.
K, I'll keep that in mind, since like me and Sophie are just sorta geek friends who like sexy time, I guess I'll need to not hang out with her and talk ton her all the time. I mean, it's not caused any problems in the last few months, but since you seem so confident in your proposition, I'll try it by experiment and report back on if the magnitude of the measure of variable "frequency of sex" increases or decreases reducing my physical proximity(I'll do it as a continuous function with LIM-->5km) , and if we talk about more or less cool science by talking less often (quantitized into steps of 24 hours across a domain of 14 quanta).
