• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Scientists have found that smoking weed does not make you stupid after all

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
Scientists have found that smoking weed does not make you stupid after all

imrs.php


You might have heard that smoking marijuana makes you stupid.

If you grew up in the '80s or '90s, that was more or less the take-home message of countless anti-drug PSAs. In more recent years, it's a message we've heard — albeit in more nuanced form — from Republican candidates on the campaign trail and from marijuana opponents at the state-level.

The contemporary version of argument can be traced to a 2012 Duke University study, which found that persistent, heavy marijuana use through adolescence and young adulthood was associated with declines in IQ.

Other researchers have since criticized that study's methods. A follow-up study in the same journal found that the original research failed to account for a number of confounding factors that could also affect cognitive development, such as cigarette and alcohol use, mental illness and socioeconomic status.

Two new reports this month tackle the relationship between marijuana use and intelligence from two very different angles: One examines the life trajectories of 2,235 British teenagers between ages 8 and 16, and the other looks at the differences between American identical twin pairs in which one twin uses marijuana and the other does not.

Despite vastly different methods, the studies reach the same conclusion: They found no evidence that adolescent marijuana use leads to a decline in intelligence.

[These are the states that could legalize pot next]

I wrote about the study of British teenagers before, when it was still a working paper. It has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, and its findings still stand: After adjusting for a range of confounding factors, such as maternal health, mental health and other substance use, the researchers found that "cannabis use by the age of 15 did not predict either lower teenage IQ scores or poorer educational performance. These findings therefore suggest that cannabis use at the modest levels used by this sample of teenagers is not by itself causally related to cognitive impairment."

They did find, though, a distinct relationship between cigarette use and poor educational performance, which is in line with what other research has found. The researchers did not find a robust link between cigarette use and IQ.

The authors of this study stress that their results don't necessarily invalidate the findings of the 2012 Duke University paper. That paper focused on persistent heavy use over a long period of time, while this study looked only at low to moderate levels of adolescent use. "While persistent cannabis dependence may be linked to declining IQ across a person’s lifetime," the authors write, "teenage cannabis use alone does not appear to predict worse IQ outcomes in adolescents."

But the researchers in the study of American twins tackle the Duke University findings head-on. Examining the life trajectories of twin pairs in which one uses marijuana while the other doesn't, they found that those who used marijuana didn't experience consistently greater cognitive deficits than the others.

Identical twin comparisons are a powerful tool for this kind of analysis, because their genetic makeup is nearly identical and their early home environment is consistent. This automatically controls for a lot of the confounding factors that can make sussing out causality difficult.

The twin data "fails to support the implication by Meier et. al. [the authors of the Duke study] that marijuana exposure in adolescence causes neurocognitive decline," the study concludes. The numbers suggest, on the contrary, that "children who are predisposed to intellectual stagnation in middle school are on a trajectory for future marijuana use." In other words, rather than marijuana making kids less intelligent, it may be that kids who are not as smart or who perform poorly in school are more inclined to try marijuana at some point in their lives.

Also, if marijuana use were responsible for cognitive decline, you might expect to find that the more marijuana a person smokes, the less intelligent they become. But this paper found that heavier marijuana use was not associated with greater decreases in IQ.

Cont -

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...king-weed-does-not-make-you-stupid-after-all/
 
See slim, I new that claim was junk. Funny I think the follow up study pointed out many of the same things we all did when we discussed this here awhile back.

Link on the twin study is protected journalist. Id like to see what else it found.
 
Last edited:
^Nice find, NSA.
I feel that using cannabis has made me smarter, if anything.
Maybe not in every way, but overall.
It certainly has helped me grasp different perspectives, including seeing myself more honestly than I did (or could have) without it.
 
You mean that there are very important and valuable aspects that these tests, the ones that are used to determine a person's "intelligence quotient," fail to consider?

Say it ain't so slim=D
 
Last edited:
I smoked weed through out high school, college, after college, present day... and i am a moron!

If i wasnt after a life dedicated to science before i could even speak i would say part of it was people in high school saying "your in this class, you are actually smart? I thought you did drugs?" hearing how weed would make me stupid, its in my personality to be like "yeah fuck you i will now prove you wrong." So maybe that did have something to do with it but probably not, its probably more about weed having no impact on my intelligence or motivation to do well.
 
I certainly agree with the overall sentiment, but it will take a lot more than this to convince me that adolescent Cannabis use is harmless.
 
^ I completely agree that no one who is still developing or values their future should use drugs on more then a very inconsistent and rare occasion. The problem with using intoxicants of any kind is they will make your life harder by nature of being in it. For example I do not study well when i am high, i can do it but its not as worthwhile. Knowing this I would wait till after i was done and before bed and i would not smoke on occasions where it would impact my studies. Adjusting my life to compensate for the fact i wanted to smoke might have had an unknown negative impact on it, if i didnt work around it the impact most likely would have been very noticeable. If you become reliant on any kind of intoxication at a young age it will make your life harder just by nature of being in it.

This is why all drugs make your life more complicated as you need to incorporate them at the appropriate times and even still the process of obtaining, using, and its after effects will impact your life. So in that sense i completely agree with you.
 
^ you're talking about abuse of strong and intoxicating drugs (not caffeine for example), but otherwise I agree with you. I'm a victim of that even though I didn't start using anything except coffee (not even alcohol) until I moved out of my parents home. It's a thought that constantly circulates in my head, from the moment I wake up to the moment I fall asleep. I'm always thinking about getting high or drinking, maybe not wanting to get high at that moment but certainly thinking about it, and plotting/planning my day accordingly. I follow the same principle as you - I do my stuff sober, because my work most of all requires cognitive abilities, and drugs more often than not dull them. But as a result of that I have a tendency to sometimes finish earlier, because I just feel like it's time to get high.
 
Top