I'm not claiming it is black and white, if anything much the opposite. I've read the article multiple times, if you are seeing something that you think I have missed, feel free to quote it and bring it to my attention, otherwise simply stating that I am missing something does nothing to back your argument and only seems to suggest that you lack capabilities to think independently.
Otherwise, I think I have made a valid argument and provided facts to back my claim. Correlation is not causation, and in this case the correlation is barely existent.
Otherwise, I think I have made a valid argument and provided facts to back my claim. Correlation is not causation, and in this case the correlation is barely existent.
