Pleonastic
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2000
- Messages
- 9,428
Here's the bill. I've only skim read it, but all the info is there.
although i say this may be where the only information comes from, you could anonymously ring your local police station after law is passed and speak to someone there that knows what the deal is. you are asking about new law, and they are there to serve the community..Pleonastic said:Any bluelighter that is stopped by the drug bus (and isn't under the influence and thus can't be busted for anything) should quiz the cops and find out as much as they can. It's probably the only way we're going to find this stuff out.
This means the law is going to provide for zero tolerance, and it doesn't look like the police will have any judgement powers to determine if you are genuinely impaired. And yes, this does mean that you can potentially be charged on the day after if you still have traces in your system but are otherwise totally fine.Clause 4, Sub-clause 1
...
The new definition of "prescribed concentration of drugs" means, in the case of a prescribed illicit drug, any concentration of the drug in the blood or oral fluid of a person. This means that a person will be guilty of the new drug-driving offences created by clauses 7(1) and 7(4) if any prescribed illicit drug is detected in his or her blood or oral fluid.
"prescribed illicit drug" is defined to mean methylamphetamine or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
my question is because it can detect alpha-methyl-phenylethylamines, therefore methylenedioxy-methylamphetamine too but also any phenylethylamine in the 2C series, 2CB, 2CI, 2CT-2, 2CT-7 or DOM and DOB etc?
shorza said:I am not sure if this has been mentioned before, but what happends if someone 'spiked' my drink at a club just before i was ready to drive home?
Surely i can't be charged for that!
wazza said:
you do realise drugs are illegal don't you??But as the government openly admits that .05 is still
twice as dangerous as .0, leeway would be nice