• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

New Zealand couple lose two sons to one drink of alcohol

Jabberwocky

Frumious Bandersnatch
Joined
Nov 3, 1999
Messages
84,998
Canterbury, New Zealand: Eight years apart, two teenage siblings died in their sleep.

The nights leading up to each of their deaths were not out of the ordinary. A meal with friends or family, and less than one drink of alcohol.

It is only now, two decades later, that researchers can say for certain it was that one drink that killed them.

The boys' parents are among the first to donate for research to Canterbury's Maia Health Foundation.

Canterbury couple John and Margaret, who did not want their last name used to protect their remaining children and grandchildren, marked 25 years since their eldest son's death on April 28.

The 15-year-old was home from boarding school for the weekend, and had gone to bed after dinner with neighbours.

"He went to bed at midnight after a minute amount of alcohol, and didn't wake up the next day," John said.

Doctors were baffled, but Margaret had her suspicions, sparked by what seemed like a severe sensitivity to alcohol for her four children.

"Cough medicine gave them pain in their chest. When Grandma brought over trifle the same thing happened.

"But one of the most obvious things was all children liked to drink dad's beer. Ours were the only children who didn't do that."

Eight years later, their 19-year-old went out for one of his new flatmate's birthdays, and had less than 10 milligrams of alcohol.

The children had been told to avoid alcohol by this stage, but his parents believed that after having just started a new job, and moved into a new flat, he simply wanted to fit in.

"He had one drink and that was the end of him. He didn't wake up the next day," John said.

"It was [traumatising]. I was very concerned how we would cope with dealing with the whole death process again," Margaret said.

Two decades later, PhD student Hannah Kennedy uncovered groundbreaking evidence of what caused the teens' deaths.

Kennedy discovered John and Margaret each carried different gene mutations and all of their children had inherited both mutations.

"In some respects it's very bad luck," Kennedy said.

Her team contacted a lab in Munich, and after their own patients with heart disorders were examined, four other families were identified with the same conditions.

It was not yet known if the couple's six grandchildren carried the mutations.

"Maybe I should never have married this pretty woman," John said.

"But we now seem to be getting a little closer to understanding why they died and are comforted by the thought that they may not have died in vain."


Source: : http://www.smh.com.au/world/new-zea...of-alcohol-20160510-gos28r.html#ixzz48IZ1lHvA
 
One died on my birthday that's just a little unsettling but I suppose it's actually a phenomenon that happens to everyone one their birthdays- that is, someone somewhere dies. Multiple someone's actually. Idk the average numbers of deaths per day but it's in the thousands for sure. Still sad and tragic that these parents has to bury two of their own children. One drink of alcohol killed them both huh? How odd.
 
I'm sorry, but I have to call bullshit on this one. First of all, 10 milligrams of alcohol? Do you mean 10 grams? 10 milligrams of alcohol (assuming 5% beer) would be 4 drops of beer. About 200 milligrams of beer. That's just nonsense. But even 10 grams of alcohol is too small of a mass to be likely to kill anyone. It's at least 20-30 times smaller lethal dose for a non-tolerant user than normal. Typically, ethanol is produced in the gut (a few grams per day IIRC), so if 10 grams of alcohol was lethal for that person, then they'd be drunk 24/7 off the gut alcohol.
 
I gotta agree. Actually, I think that the writer doesnt realize Weight per Volume is Grams per 100ml.
 
Well some people have died of nut allergies after consuming no more than 1 or 2 peanuts.
 
The point I was trying to make is that ethanol is always in the body, albeit in small quantities, but still present. That's part of the reason we're so tolerant towards ethanol (as opposed to other light molecules). If the person was somehow allergic to ethanol, then it'd have become apparent before his death. It does not talk of that in the article, but I would probably go with the explanation that he mixed some other CNS depressants at the party with the alcohol. I think that's a lot more likely than someone dying from 10 grams of ethanol while never noticing any other problems associated with it before.

Plus, if he really died from solely the alcohol, then why was he not intoxicated to oblivion beforehand? I can't think of any other way ethanol can suddenly kill someone other than respiratory depression/choking on vomit from heavy intoxication.
 
Top