I looked up the information about the 36 Democratic candidates, three Republicans, and others and at least the Democrats and Republicans are all in the tank for the Bolshevik gangsters who are using the fake opioid cri$i$ to line their pockets and go on a power trip . . . The handful who may be educable are being worked over by the Democratic establishment for such things as being in favour of sane foreign policy and so on . . .
Almost the exact same comments about the fake opioid crisis from everyone . . . It all really is something awful. Not a peep about the fact that somehow all sorts of poison is finding its way into US citizens and killing them because and that chronic pain patients and people with cancer and their doctors are being terrorised and being non-consensually taken off pain medications, which does kill patients in poor health with heart attacks, strokes and so forth, as well as there being suicides. What I really would fear wolud be someone there being goaded into going postal by everything done to them, and the case being used by the propagandists for their evil purposes . . ..
The one thing about the pharmaceutical companies I have been hearing of late -- it is the same media and political people who are pushing the propaganda about the fake opioid crisis -- they want a scapegoat now that people are starting to question all the propaganda about narcotics. It sounds like what happened is that the have pushed the doctors and patients too far and there is a push-back; anything from demonstrations to people showing up at political meetings, some of it showing in the media . . . the trickle of chronic pain patients as well as physicians to Canada started in about February, and I do know of a handful of folks have come to Continental Europe one location or another with plans never to return to the United States because of the situation and presumably some other locations as well. How many people in the United States are in pain and have the resources to escape? I guess more of the poor stay sick and vice versa . . .
The pharmaceutical companies are convenient scapegoats, but aren't they just serving a demand for medications which are the result things going on which are subject to debate?
If at all possible, in the 1980s and 1990s, people in chronic pain were in even worse shape, and Purdue and others were doing what they were established to do, and what they and their competitors do, and being in the business of selling medicine to people . . . their motives were what they should have been. . . and why should there not be money do to be made in selling medication if there s money to be made in the rehabilitation racket?
Now that people are starting to see through the lies about the fake opioid crisis, these power trippers and gangsters need someone else to blame, for something and it is all very convenient. What exactly are pharmaceutical companies supposed to be in the business of doing, according to these people?
There was no opioid crisis . . . there are people who are the gangsters who make money from people in drug rehabilitation, , and the motivations of politicians like the Anslingers, Harrisons, Nesses, and Nixons of the world are very dark, so much so that it is very troubling on which to speculate. Who has that much trouble with the idea of other people doing something because it makes them happy that they are willing to do truly atrocious things. Mainly it is greed. Cops are employed by the racket, all of the social workers and people who run the rehabilitation rackets do . . . then there are the people who have worse motives -- the people in political office elected or appointed who are threatening the doctors and patients. The kind of people who go after patients who are advocates for other patients . . . I sure most of it is mercenary and all about greed. Corruption too . . . Drug rehabilitation as a business calling forth its own demand, with medical, political, and law enforcement cover -- the latter is known in business school as
Fari vagnari u pizzu . . .
-- a pretty neat deal, and the insurance companies get into that
The whole thing is awfully convenient -- people who make money from addiction traffic in any number of definitions of it which serve their purposes and no one else's . . .
Even something supposedly as useful as the prescription monitoring databases now in all states is rife with corruption. Going back to when they were being established, If someone is always in the media and jawboning legislatures, medical groups, pharmacy lobbies, and others for these databases, what if they own the firms, or people they known work there, or oodles of stock, bonds, capital equipment or real estate related to the groups in question? If patient advocate organisations and consumer groups were in such a positions, wouldn't that be all over the newspapers as insider trading? That level of connexion in all this really smells of corruption -- people get rich from the rehab business and law enforcement at all levels is protected and it is a business which calls forth its own demand -- in the dictionary definition a racket.
One, they are the tools that the CDC and other government people have used to threaten doctors who are treating patients with chronic pain. There is the science fiction they are pushing about the connexion of chronic pain treatment to addiction, and a totally arbitrary lie about 90 mg morphine base equivalent leading to that and early death and all that. That would be bad enough, but the databases are mainly known for things like pharmacists offering to fill benzodiazepine scripts 1 to 3 days early for a $50 cash fee, talking really loudly with 15 people in line about carisoprodol and fentanyl scripts when a patient who is not afraid of them comes in, people from the US attorneys' offices, state departments of justice, and pharmacy examiners violating HIPPA and things like that in order to cow television presenters and local politicians into being quiet about all this by mailing their pharmacy records to people. How about the cases where the pharmacist uses the information to, for example, keep bitching about all the narcotics a doctor's office is allegedly writing for until one of the nurses has sex with the pharmacist? Or the doctor caves and writes for Adderall for one of the pharmacy techs who has been pestering the doctor for several days for an unclear indication, and certainly provides no ICD-10 diagnosis code?
It is politically incorrect to point out that into the 1950s morphine and the like were used for intractable depression, and now oxymorphone, butorphanol, dihydrocodeine, hydromorphone, hydrocodone, and piritramide, and so on are being researched for those conditions.
