yoyoman
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2006
- Messages
- 304
Both of these especially the meth version are available by many chemical companies. I've heard N-hydroxy versions of MDMA and other Shulgin compounds were nearly identical to the non hydroxy versions.
I've read conflicting answers to whether or not these would be active. If so it would make for a good analog (for RC companies to sell, although to prevent degradation maybe N-acetoxy-amphetamine etc might stabilize them?).
What do you guys think? It would be nice if N-hydroxy-N-ethylamphetamine was made and sold. I've read it can be complicated to find an answer if its a tertiary amine - but if N-hydroxy-MDMA works why wouldn't the meth/ethyl ones work?
Maybe they would be shorter lived... an old hive post came up with someone claiming racemic N-hydroxyamphetamine was more potent than d-methamphetamine.
I've read conflicting answers to whether or not these would be active. If so it would make for a good analog (for RC companies to sell, although to prevent degradation maybe N-acetoxy-amphetamine etc might stabilize them?).
What do you guys think? It would be nice if N-hydroxy-N-ethylamphetamine was made and sold. I've read it can be complicated to find an answer if its a tertiary amine - but if N-hydroxy-MDMA works why wouldn't the meth/ethyl ones work?
Maybe they would be shorter lived... an old hive post came up with someone claiming racemic N-hydroxyamphetamine was more potent than d-methamphetamine.