blueberries
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2011
- Messages
- 339
I was looking through the paper; Influence of Amine Substituents on 5-HT2A versus 5-HT2C Binding of Phenylalkyl- and Indolylalkyl- amines: Glennon et al., and found that among the probable starter compounds that Nichols used to find the NBOMe set of compounds, there was another of significant value.
That compound was N-Methyl-(4-Bromobenzyl)-Mexamine:
While the other Mexamine analogues tested did not show much, this compound showed highly potent and selective 5-HT2a agonism, some 10x the potency of 2C-B. However, as with the 2C-B counterparts, which all showed similar affinities with similar analogues, this one was unique amongst it's analogues, suggesting any enhancement on the phenyl ring would be worthless.
Has this been looked into more? Perhaps a 4-HO compound may be more useful with a slightly lower potency, while retaining this selectivity (I doubt it but it's a possibility).
EDIT: Sorry got the name wrong in the title, could someone change it? Thanks.
That compound was N-Methyl-(4-Bromobenzyl)-Mexamine:
While the other Mexamine analogues tested did not show much, this compound showed highly potent and selective 5-HT2a agonism, some 10x the potency of 2C-B. However, as with the 2C-B counterparts, which all showed similar affinities with similar analogues, this one was unique amongst it's analogues, suggesting any enhancement on the phenyl ring would be worthless.
Has this been looked into more? Perhaps a 4-HO compound may be more useful with a slightly lower potency, while retaining this selectivity (I doubt it but it's a possibility).
EDIT: Sorry got the name wrong in the title, could someone change it? Thanks.
Last edited: