Fertile
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2022
- Messages
- 1,627
Forget personal experiences, does anyone know of a benzodiazepine that is more potent than brotizolam? AFAIK brotizolam is the only benzodiazepine that comes as 1/8th mg (125 ug) tablets.
As far as I can see, it's optimised for potency but interestingly, it has a triazolo ring which means it has MUCH less a1 affinity. I mean, that's good - less chance of people doing crazy things under the influence but if I recall, nitrobenzodiazepines (even those robbed of a1 activity) are about twice the potency of those with (pseudo)halogens at the 7/8 position (numbering depends on 4th ring being present).
US 4094984 is very specifically for brotizolam so someone had a clear aim in mind.
US4199588A deals with all of the different possible (or at least usual) 8 substituents includes the nitro homologue although it doesn't deal with HOW to make the precursor.
Later patents do NOT mention the 8-nitro homologue. I think the problem is the production of 3-[1-(2-chlorophenyl)ethenyl]-5-nitrothiophen-2-amine. No search brings up the compound.
It IS a total guess but I am reasonably certain that the 8-nitro homologue of brotizolam would be around twice as potent as the parent compound. Once you HAVE that compound, it's reasonably straightforward chemistry to produce the final product. Now, since it's a nitro on an aromatic, a lot of work has gone into their synthesis but it's still something of a sticking point in organic chemistry. If the triazolo is swapped for an imidazolo, it looks like it's possible to increase potency and adding a (chiral) 3 methyl DOES increase activity but I'm not sure if it's increase in affinity or increase in LogP. It's one of the few things I would be reasonably confident about.... but unless your synthesis is chiral, you lose half of your product.
I might add that people may wonder if the o-F homologue is more potent. It is not. It was chosen over related compounds because it's LogP was most appropriate to balance the onset and the duration.
BTW people sometimes imagine that zolazepam must be potent because it's used on elephants... but it's not. It's water-soluble with a short duration of action; THAT is why it was chosen.
As far as I can see, it's optimised for potency but interestingly, it has a triazolo ring which means it has MUCH less a1 affinity. I mean, that's good - less chance of people doing crazy things under the influence but if I recall, nitrobenzodiazepines (even those robbed of a1 activity) are about twice the potency of those with (pseudo)halogens at the 7/8 position (numbering depends on 4th ring being present).
US 4094984 is very specifically for brotizolam so someone had a clear aim in mind.
US4199588A deals with all of the different possible (or at least usual) 8 substituents includes the nitro homologue although it doesn't deal with HOW to make the precursor.
Later patents do NOT mention the 8-nitro homologue. I think the problem is the production of 3-[1-(2-chlorophenyl)ethenyl]-5-nitrothiophen-2-amine. No search brings up the compound.
It IS a total guess but I am reasonably certain that the 8-nitro homologue of brotizolam would be around twice as potent as the parent compound. Once you HAVE that compound, it's reasonably straightforward chemistry to produce the final product. Now, since it's a nitro on an aromatic, a lot of work has gone into their synthesis but it's still something of a sticking point in organic chemistry. If the triazolo is swapped for an imidazolo, it looks like it's possible to increase potency and adding a (chiral) 3 methyl DOES increase activity but I'm not sure if it's increase in affinity or increase in LogP. It's one of the few things I would be reasonably confident about.... but unless your synthesis is chiral, you lose half of your product.
I might add that people may wonder if the o-F homologue is more potent. It is not. It was chosen over related compounds because it's LogP was most appropriate to balance the onset and the duration.
BTW people sometimes imagine that zolazepam must be potent because it's used on elephants... but it's not. It's water-soluble with a short duration of action; THAT is why it was chosen.
Last edited: