babooon87
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2008
- Messages
- 185
Hi everyone, I have read on many occasions on this forum of people taking psychedelics by intramuscular injection.
Personally when I inject I use subcutaneous injections which I find works well and seems much safer than I.M. I mean I would much rather get an abces just beneath the skin that I can take notice of immediately than one that festers deep in my muscle tissue that would surely warrant an E.R. visit if it gets ugly.
So my question to the people who have experience with both : is I.M. that much better, more potent, faster to justifie the added risks ? Or am I missing something else ? Thank you .
Personally when I inject I use subcutaneous injections which I find works well and seems much safer than I.M. I mean I would much rather get an abces just beneath the skin that I can take notice of immediately than one that festers deep in my muscle tissue that would surely warrant an E.R. visit if it gets ugly.
So my question to the people who have experience with both : is I.M. that much better, more potent, faster to justifie the added risks ? Or am I missing something else ? Thank you .