If you used dichloromethane, it could be possible that the beta-carboline is an artifact produced by the extraction process. Dichloromethane in contact with aqueous alkali will cause a substitution recation to take place, the final product being formaldehyde. From what I remember, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde very easily react with tryptamines to form beta-carboline structures via a variation of the Mannich condensation reaction (the 2,3-double bond being the active methylene bond).
I wouldn't bet money on it, but if you carried out the extraction without the use of methylene chloride as the non-polar solvent, you wouldn't see significant amounts of the beta-carboline
PS Did you use any reagents that could have contained small/trace amounts of (or could form) formaldehyde/acetaldehyde for your T. peruvianus extraction, as phenethylamines are also susceptable to the same modified Mannich condensation, to form substituted isoquinolines?