• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: swilow | Vagabond696

"Ice", meth, 4-MAR. identifying characteristics...

Hmm you could be right Runner, however the melting point of these substances is a lot higher than that of oxygen...... So 37C is a lot lower than 170-180C (my guess of melting point for those lovely little crystals) The substance may experience a rapid cooling during the inhalation proccess causing it to recrystalize in small quantities.

ALL THIS IS PURE SPECULATION OF A PERSON WITH LIMITED CHEMISTRY KNOWLEDGE


edit: Oh I agree with you about the build up thing though Runner. Its a water soluble and would not build up in the lungs or blood stream/heart. However some addulterants may not be so friendly?
 
Last edited:
Meth does NOT recrystallise in your lungs. This is a MYTH. Meth is water soluble and would dissolve in the moist environment of your lungs and be absorbed into the bloodstream.

If you have meth cut with adulterants on the other hand... the cutting compounds may not be water soluble. Try to avoid smoking cut meth. Pure meth should leave no residue on the pipe and should produce cool, white smoke, not horrible tasting black smoke.

BigTrancer :)
 
I have had 4-MAR on several occations and I find it to be far more MDMA style euphoric unlike the raw energy on speed. I also find that it lasts far longer than any speed (one does will charge me anywhere up to 16 hours and leave me unable to sleep for another 6). It has a fairly low melting point, it doesnt have much of a test result (salmon pink after a long time) and is distiguishable from meth crystal by the shape of the crystals (ice-rock shaped white transulcent as opposed to shards of glass like material like meth).

Ice is rare, though not impossible to find. At the moment there seem to be quite a few people around in my circles saying they have ice and I can verify (99% sure) that at least one of them did actually have real 4-MAR.

So yeah ummm.... its around but rare
 
Interesting....

The test result is interesting is there anyone out there that could explain that result?

A point tho, you cannot simply judge 4-MAR from methamphetamine by appearance alone, both chemicals can have an opaque look or a more glassy look. It all depends on how pure, how its been crystalised etc.
 
No person can really know how the testers will react - its too hit and miss. Only way of knowing is to synthesise 4-MAR, analyse via a laboratory to confirm success, and then test it.

One thing that SHOULD be for certain however is 4-MAR contains a PRIMARY amine - that means it should react positively to robadope in the Xtreme tester. Methamphetamine will not react like this.

Personally i am willing to believe someone has had 4-MAR if the effects are the kind expected of a stimulant, it looks like white opaque ice, and the marquis test result is NOT orange/brown.
Hence Josh_nexus has probably had it.

But Runner is right imo; syndicates are not exporting massive quantities of 4-MAR; meth is the drug of addiction, and ice as in crystallised meth, could become the Crack of the Asia-Australian region.

Another explanation of differing effects of ice is because the mass produced stuff from Asia could be made from P2P not pseudoephedrine.
The former produces racemic DL meth, the latter only D.
Definitely would have differing subjective effects.
 
Just to add another comment as food for thought after reading a couple of latest comments - and make your own judgements...

Remembering the past couple of times i've smoked "ice" - white to clear, slightly opaque crystals of various forms and sizes - these were my subjective effects:

Warm feeling throught the whole body, upon getting up a feeling of pure pleasure through whole body. No increase in heart rate or breathing, every topic of conversation seems exciting, feeling complete love for all your friends and just how awesome they all are. Not much motivation to dance - but I could if I wanted to cause I KNOW i'm the best dancer around the way I am feeling, but no chance of sleep for at least 10 hours. Complete lightness and clearheadedness and more than enough motivation to do anything including work, study etc.

Now, if i was a newbee, i'd conclude that I've had 4-MAR.
 
ICE is in perth.. theres no doubt about it. I dunno about melbourne but i can definately say its here.. There isnt a lot of it but it is there..... runner there is certainly a marktet for it i think if not purely for dealers themsleves alone. Most of what people refer to as "rocks" are actually just meth but ice is there i know ive had it..... for me i enjoy it more than meth

can any1 give me a definate with the ez-testers would love to try testing
 
after reading a respected forum specialising in the area of illicit chemicals a post from a user states he has physically tested 4-MAR with no reaction under a marquis reagent.

i think 4-MAR can be compared to this example of the state of mdxx pills a few years ago in melbourne. whenever someone had a bad mdxx experience they would conclude their pill had mdea in it. over time this seemed to stop and now i think people have read about 4-MAR online and are starting to conclude they have had it. i dont think it is sold very much if at all in australia and the crystal amphetamines people have access to now is simply high quality methamphetamine. when people read information they often tend to believe it is more common than it may in fact actually be.
 
Last edited:
Well, if everyone agrees, another time we should have a discussion about this is only when someone trustworthy comes back with a definite result of rocks that got them off their head but tested completelly clear with marquise. Until that test, I for one conclude that no one that has expressed their opinion so far has actually had 4-MAR.

(As a disclaimer, I don't encourage anyone having anything that tests clear with marquise before taking it) ;)
 
I'm am with all you 3 also - i dont know how many times in the last 2 years i have pleaded for people to try testing with marquis. (Xtreme even better now that thats available)

All this continual banter about rocks, ice, shapes, colours, smells, cement, translucency, smoking vs snorting, rushing not rushing, awake not awake, MDXX like, whizz like, blah blah blah.

If something tests clear or even not orange/brown, THEN IT IS NOT METH. case closed - and finally someone will have proven the stuff they have which is called ICE is NOT methamphetamine. IT doesnt mean it is 4-MAR but it at least likely.

As the others said, until then, no one has a right to claim anything. I'd love people to prove me wrong - all it takes is a marquis test, and that is something i thought most of us should have anyway.
 
i thought 4-mar wasnt actually an amphetamine.

anyway like josh_nexus have tried 4-mar on a number of occasions. I think like anything its a case of who you know.

Like a few other people I know who have also tried it. Much prefer it over meth.
 
I've tested stuff sold as "ice" before and it turned orange with Marquis and blue with Simon's (secondary amine). Biscuit mentioned that 4-MAR is a primary amine, so it shouldn't react with Simon's right? Also, I've read conflicting reports - does 4-MAR react with Marquis to a peachy orange or produce no reaction? It'll be interesting to get this resolved. :)
 
I've tested stuff sold as "ice" before and it turned orange with Marquis and blue with Simon's (secondary amine).

From that test result you can confidently conclude your sample contained methamphetamine.

BigTrancer :)
 
a post from a user on a well known chemistry board has tested 4-MAR after he synthesised it with marquis reagent and it tested clear. from this and other sources referenced in this thread and others i think its safe to say an orange reaction is methamphetamine not 4-MAR.
 
Last edited:
Before anyone questions Cowboy's source i would like to reiterate that these chemists synthesise everything from meth, MDMA, 2-CB to more obscure ones like 2-CT-7.

For these guys 4-MAR, both for chemical availability and skill purposes, is an absolute walk in the park.(it does look complicated below, but with the proper starting material, PPA, its extremely easy)
Hence i would be inclined to believe the above before discounting it.
=============================================

Temporary_nick: i have done this before but for a few reasons i am going to do it again:

Amphetamine (this is regular amphetamine - this is the structure that forms the base of ALL amphetamines whether meth, MDA, MDMA, PMA etc)
amphetamine_2d.gif



Methamphetamine (also known as meth, methylamphetamine etc):
methamphetamine_2d.jpg



4-methylaminorex
4_methylaminorex_2d.gif


==============================================

To classify an amine you examine the nitrogen (=N) area of the molecule. Count the number of lines coming OFF the N (not the Hs).
One = primary amine
Two = secondary amine
Three = tertiary amine

Amphetamine has ONE line - hence it is a primary amine and will react:
Robadope = salmon
Simons = colourless
Marquis = orange

Meth has TWO lines - hence it is secondary amine and will react:
Robadope = colourless
Simons = blue
Marquis = orange

4-MAR: look at this - firstly it is NOTHING like the other two is it - it is NOT an amphetamine!

Additionally there are TWO nitrogens (N) i.e: 2 amine groups.

Consider the one on the far right: that is primary and will react as a primary amine should.

But the other one if you count the lines has 3 - it is technically TERTIARY - this is where the big mystery comes in - how does Simons react with tertiarys? i have no idea.
There is also a possibility that it will become a secondary amine once it is acidified into a salt (this is its crystal/ice form)- one of those double lines will disappear and u will see a H instead.
But u will notice the N is in a big ring, (unlike the N in meth), and its arguable even if it is secondary in its ice form, it may not react the same.

So for 4-MAR you have:
Robadope: salmon
Simons: POSSIBLY blue; otherwise colourless
Marquis: ALMOST CERTAINLY COLOURLESS; at the very least not orange as per amphetamine/methamphetamine.


Hope that helps - may i congratulate you on using the Xtreme tester on your substance. (thats Meth= 1 ; 4-MAR= 0)

In fact i encourage you to test any stimulant/speed-type substance coming your way, that may be different from a previous sample - imo the Xtreme tester can DEFINITIVELY (as far as testers go at least) tell you if your substance is amphetamine, methamphetamine, 4-MAR or none of these.
And we here at Bluelight would very much appreciate the results.


And finally i ask everyone to look at the TITLE of this thread...
"ICE" - METH, 4-MAR - IDENTIFYING CHARACTERISTICS"

Have a think about that then look at my molecular diagrams...those pictures are the ONLY identifying characteristics separating these two molecules - and the most powerful microscope in the world cannot see them.
We use laboratory equipment or in this case chemical reagents to see them FOR us. They see them, and then they communicate to us those molecular structures via signals (lab equipment) or colours (chemical testers) - and it is only from those that we know what the substance is.

This is why a sample of "opaque, ice-like rock", no matter how long we look at it for, or what we think it does to us, is just NOT good enough, when answering the question of what you might be holding.
Because of this, any conclusions reached this way are USELESS at answering the topic of this thread.
 
Last edited:
Mods: i just realised there MAY be copyright issues here with the images - i do not know BLs policy on this, although nothing was said when they were used in the "nanna cant tell" thread; and that is one of the most viewed, bumped and referenced threads on the forum.
 
Last edited:
IMO the images are self-referencing and they're not being copied for any gain or for advertising etc. AFAIK there have never been any past issues with copying anything from The Vaults, we're always careful to reference information gleaned from there.

If issues surface in the future, I'll deal with them as they arise.

BigTrancer :)
 
Excellent - that was my take on it.
In any event most countries have in their laws an allowance to use copyright material fairly, if its for educational purposes.

This is clearly such a case even if the owners did object - but as BT said thats most unlikely.
:)
 
Last edited:
Top