ld50 vs ssri
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2004
- Messages
- 996
What do you mean stupid mate, he is raising a valid point. Are you stupid? it may be speculation, but it makes for a good discussion.
got the top ones and they are duds just found out look out people!!peaked said:Though I haven't personally tried the ones in adelaide, everyone whom i've spoken to here that has had them said they were pretty much bunk. They look very similar to the ones in melbourne, only they differ slightly in thickness, with the adelaide ones being 8.2 x 4.5 whereas the melb ones are 8.1 x 5.15, and they have a slightly different looking score (the adel ones have a large V score whereas the melb ones have a skinnier (what appears to be) U shaped score.
The top one is the bunk ones, the bottom one is the active ones.
Pretty similar huh ...
(Pictures taken from ld50's report (linked above) and pinyata's report http://www.pillreports.com/viewpill.php3?sub=-1&area=3&id=46662 )
True thanx for the advice Should of known betterld50 vs ssri said:It might pay to buy a reagent tester. Another way i have found that helps to eliminate the chances of buying bunk/adulterated and/or weak dosed pills is when a pill gets a reputation, i dont bother purchasing them anymore, the ammount of copycat batches i have seen latly is outrageous.
Mine did have a score, got them just before rave event that passed very recently in Melb., good timing huh?Sevoflurane said:I know the ones he's talking about. These were going around the Sydney area, Cant remember dimensions sorry but they were smaller then the real deal, had no score, weren't domed and only were speckled white only. As he said, crumbly and smelt like crap. Marquis tested orange, simmons no reaction, robadope no reaction. I didn't take em after testing.
alexkid said:
i had the top ones in perth on 16/03.
experienced all the "good effects" from the "good batch". funny that8)
edit: edit: