^ I was wondering when it was going to come down to personal insults - in my experience that's the last refuge of someone who's run out of proper arguements and knows that they're wrong, but has too large an ego to be able to admit it. For all your bleating, you've presented no info/data from respected independant research/medical journals to back your claim over several threads on the subject.
You spread misinformation all over this forum
Hey, if someone pulls me up on a point and produces data to show me I'm incorrect then I'm happy to admit I'm wrong (I can think of a rew times it's happened) and I learn from it rather than becoming petulant and insulting people in a totally groundless manner.
Its people like you that got GHB banned in the first place
How? c'mon, put your money where your mouth is and explain how my approach of referencing research data was responsible for getting GHB banned. More likely it was irresponsible idiots going around saying that it was a perfectly safe, non-toxic compound that were responsible - people have died from GHB alone, so misinformation given out that it was perfectly safe is most probably the main reason that it got banned.
Pure GHB Powder is where its at buddy
What the fuck is that supposed to mean in terms of the subject of this thread (GHB and acidosis in case you can only hold a limited amount of information at any one time) - where what is?
quit repping about your amphetamine sulphate bullshit as if thats any safer for your body.
And there we have a perfect example that you either don't read or don't understand what I've been saying. I've never said amphetamine is any safer for your body (in fact it's most probably a lot worse for your body) - I was using the example of how injecting amphetamine (ie getting the full dose into your bloodstream in 30 seconds) is going to produce a lot more side effects than the same dose of amphetamine taken orally (2-3 hours for all the dose taken to get into the bloodstream). This relates to how GBL produces much higher plasma levels of GHB because it is absorbed a hell of a lot faster from the GI tract than GHB - even the fact that it has to be converted into GHB in the bloodstream doesn't make that much difference as it only takes 8-12 mins to convert all the GBL to GHB, which is still far faster than the levels reached by direct absorbtion of GHB.
As I said, if you'd read & understood the analogy you wouldn't have had cause to make the above rediculous statement. I don't know if you're too arrogant to read what I said, or simply didn't understand it, but if you look back over my posts, you'll find I made no claim that amphetamine sulphate was safer. If you're going to try and insult someone, it helps if you can actually use something they've said as a basis for the insults rather than what you think they said/what you'd have liked them to say.
Who are you to believe anyway, you aren't the genius like you think you are when it comes to drugs.
I've always said & encouraged people never to just believe a person (esp me), but to check their facts against text books etc as people make mistakes so anything said should be confirmed independantly. I never realized I was dealing with a psychic (or is it something similar sounding?) who could tell me about thoughts that I was never even aware of... I don't think I'm a genius (anyone who thinks
themselves a genius is generally only a rabid megalomaniac. Genius is a term that others use to describe a person), but I'll acknowledge that I do know a fair bit about drugs; after all that's what the focus of all my academic study was while at university so if I didn't I'd be a pretty sad case. I will say this though, I know a sight more about drugs than you do; infact I've most probably forgotten more information about drugs than you presently know - that's pretty evident from reading some of your previous posts.
PS I was willing to be fairly civil about this topic when I originally saw that you'd posted in this thread, but I had a feeling it would come down to this. The fact that you felt compelled to start being personal speaks volumes about you. I can only say to anybody else to thouroghly investigate the topic for themselves from reputable, independant sources and come to their own conclusion. If it turns out that after all that, people think that you're correct I'll get all sorts of derisive comments in posts, but until that time I'll continue to counter misinformation from zealots like you that don't want to see the truth. Other than that, we can only wait and see - and in the end, time will tell...