• ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️



    Film & Television

    Welcome Guest


    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
    Forum Rules Film Chit-Chat
    Recently Watched Best Documentaries
    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • Film & TV Moderators: ghostfreak

film: mysterious skin

rate this movie

  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/1star.gif[/img]

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/2stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 2 25.0%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/3stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/4stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/5stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 6 75.0%

  • Total voters
    8

animal_cookie

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Nov 4, 2002
Messages
12,536
Skin Crawls
Gregg Araki's latest is more icky than mysterious.
By Luke Y. Thompson

Published: Wednesday, July 6, 2005


Who / What:
Mysterious Skin
Directed By:
Gregg Araki, based on the novel by Scott Heim
Written By:
Brady Corbet, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Chase Ellison, and George Webster

Gregg Araki likes to shock. That's no secret to anyone following the director's career, but a cartoonish layer of unreality has usually kept the sexual pairings and graphic violence somewhat at a distance. There's a little of that in Mysterious Skin, but mostly it stays grounded in the real world. Araki seems to have finally taken in a few Todd Solondz movies, then realized that abusing actor James Duval delivers nowhere near the shock value of abusing children. Put it this way: If you're Michael Jackson, this is the movie for you. If not, you're gonna find it creepy.
As trippy music plays over the opening credits, it looks as if leaves are falling down over a white background. Only as the focus finally sharpens do we realize that they are in fact Froot Loops, dropping on the head of eight-year-old Neil (Chase Ellison). We'll get back to him eventually and realize the disturbing implications of the falling cereal, but first comes the story of another eight-year-old, this one named Brian (George Webster), who suffers a couple of blackouts that induce bloody noses and decides that alien abduction must have been responsible.

Then back to Neil, experiencing his first orgasm while watching his mom (Elisabeth Shue, in full-on drunken-slut mode) have sex with a random guy he describes in voice-over as "all Marlboro Man, dumb as a fuckin' rock -- what I would years later call my type." A Little Leaguer, Neil is immediately awestruck by the coach (Bill Sage), a well-built man with blond hair and a porn-star mustache. The feeling is mutual. Coach's house turns out to be stocked with video games, junk food, and everything else a boy could want. Get the boy there, and the coach has what he wants.

Neil reacts by becoming just as cynical and abusive, at one point kidnapping another boy, shooting bottle rockets out of his mouth, then masturbating him to ensure he'll be too embarrassed to tell anyone. By the time he's a teenager, Neil's become a hustler, hanging out in the park until creepy middle-aged men offer him a ride.

Meanwhile, Brian has grown up to be played by Brady Corbet (Thirteen, Thunderbirds), who has a vibe not unlike Goonies-era Sean Astin. After watching a TV special on alien abduction, he contacts one of the subjects, an awkward, limping girl named Avalyn (Mary Lynn Rajskub). She encourages him to interpret his dreams, leading him to memories of Neil, whom he seeks out in order to determine the truth -- which of course involves something worse than aliens. Before the two boys meet, however, Araki dwells mostly on Neil's hustling adventures, which, while not including full-frontal nudity, feature such charming details as the graphic sounds of a john gagging on ejaculate, then rinsing his mouth out; a man covered in AIDS lesions; and ultimately, a violent sexual assault. The pace isn't relentless, as we get moments of humor and beauty in between, but the movie relishes the sordid details above anything else, in a way that's likely to alienate viewers who might otherwise appreciate the acting and the story.

So is Mysterious Skin a good movie? Hard to say. Mostly, it creeps you out, and not in any kind of fun way.
taken from
here

the review summarizes the movie better than i could have. even tho i disgaree with it...

i thought the movie did an extremely good job dealing with a touchy subject matter. it was wonderfuly acted, and stayed true to the book (from what i have read anyhow). and it never seemed like it was intended as a NAMBLA ad.

the movie lacked the bright, surreal atmosphere of gregg araki's other films. i went into the movie expecting something fucked up like doom generation. but this movie was far more somber and emotional. i left the theater unsure of my opinion on the movie. all i knew was that it had an impact on me.
 
I saw this a couple of weeks ago after it came out here in Sydney and was impressed and disturbed.

There was a bit of drama over here about trying to get this film banned, so hey I had to go out and see what all the fuss was about, and I have to 100% disagree with what the pro-ban people were about. They were basically saying that the film is a how-to guide to child molestation. Most of these "critics" had not even seen the film.

To me, this film shows the brutal effects of child sexual abuse on the continuing lives of the victims. It shows the paths that their lives take and how they deal with the situation.

This is a very good film, which can be difficult to watch, but is definitely worth it in the end.

CB.
 
i did not see the film as a how to guide what so ever. the movie focuses on the two victims, the molestor has very little screen time. and the majority of the movie takes place in the years after the molestation.

on a related note, what do you tell the child actors in the movie? the kids who play neil and brian when they are young are only 11 or 12 themselves. as a parent, i am not sure i would want my child acting in this sort of movie. nor would i know if i would allow them to see the final cut.
 
It is a very disturbing area to work in. It can't be remarkably healthy, mentally for children to experience this sort of thing, even if it is the makebelieve of the movies...

I think the same thing about all of these disturbing movies... happiness, kids etc...

CB.
 
i just watched this film. Wow. It was pretty intense. I think it is one of this films where i am not sure whether i liked it or not. I do agree though that some of the shots and scenes are a little creepy, bordering on voyeuristic.

Although i must say, i was still at a loss to see how this was a 'how-to' guide for people wanting to touch up little kiddies.
 
animal_cookie said:
on a related note, what do you tell the child actors in the movie? the kids who play neil and brian when they are young are only 11 or 12 themselves. as a parent, i am not sure i would want my child acting in this sort of movie. nor would i know if i would allow them to see the final cut.


I just watched this film, and that aspect was disturbing to me as well- however, I noted that most, if not all, the child molestation scenes were filmed face-on so the children were seperate from the molester; the shots usually were face-on. I just found the concept of the director getting a young boy to mimic jacking off pretty disturbing...

Anyway, overall this movie did my head really badly; I found the rape scene to be a horrible visit with a very ugly side of humaity, or masculainity if you want to pare it down. I'm not sure if the movie was even good, or told a particularly compelling story, but it goes where not many other films dare... if you've ever experienced anything like that its not good for anything but making you feel like shit
 
I haven't seen this movie yet, as I'm not too terribly fond of Greg Araki. However, I've heard a lot of comparisons to Todd Solondz when talking about this movie, which makes me more likely to give it a try at some point.
 
^i can see the comparison. its worlds apart from nowhere or doom generation.
 
willow11 said:
Anyway, overall this movie did my head really badly; I found the rape scene to be a horrible visit with a very ugly side of humaity, or masculainity if you want to pare it down.

Women can rape as well, and in fact do.
 
I really really want to see this movie. I'm looking for the DVD !
mysterious-skin.jpg
 
This is one of the most perverted pieces of shit in history. I've seen child-porn hentai, bestiality, scat and real executions but Gregg Araki should repent of this fag shite then promptly OD on oxycontin... fucking weird CUNT.
 
I saw this movie a few months ago with my roomie. We both found it very disturbing. My roomie didn't appreciate the film, found it (negatively) disturbing and w/o a point. I appreciate it for the art of it, understand that it is supposed to be disturbing and that it paints a picture of a way of life/a dark world not commonly observed, and allows viewers to create a way of relating to people who have gone through anything remotely relative to the films subject.

I liked the film - it did what it needed to do. Disturbing? Yes. For everyone? No way.
 
Top