Anybody has it, at least its binding affinity to main targets as GABA and NMDA? https://www.bindingdb.org has binding profiles only for drugs, and alcohol is not considered a drug.
N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | thegreenhand
Alcohol doesn't bind to specific site(s) and hence specific affinity values cannot be calculated. It is an allosteric modulator of different ion channels and the potencies of such effects have been reported, but that is not the same as the binding affinity. This has nothing to do with the fact that alcohol may or may not be a drug (it is).
Benzodiazepines interact with a specific binding site that is part of the GABA-A channel, usually with at least moderate affinity. By contrast, it isn't clear whether there is actually a specific binding site for ethanol. Part of the problem is that binding studies require use of a radioligand that has high affinity and low levels of nonspecific binding (ie, most of the binding should be to the site of interest). Alcohol however tends to stick to membranes. Since alcohols and similar compounds are the only thing known to bind to that potential "site", there isn't any useful way to label the site, so no way to measure affinity.So we cant calculate its NMDA and GABA binding affinity? Benzos are also allosteric modulators of GABAa, but their affinity is known.
Ok, and what about NMDA receptor binding of ethanol? It also cant be evaluated?
so when are scientists going to figure out how alcohol works on the brain. its the oldest drug been used and abused by people and modern science still cannot figure out what it does to the brain exactly. amazing!
I should note that there is a benzodiazepine derivative known as Ro15–4513 that was suspected to bind to the same site as ethanol on a subset of GABA-A receptors. But it is far from clear that they compete for the same site and such an interaction wouldn't allow you to define the affinity of ethanol for most GABA-A channels, let alone its other targets.
I wouldn't have written what I did if there wasn't specific evidence that there is a competitive interaction. Yes, the structures of alcohol and Ro15-4513 are completely different, but that doesn't mean that they can't interact with the same site. Someone went through the trouble of tritiating Ro15-4513 and in binding studies there was evidence of competitive displacement of its binding to GABA-A receptors by alcohol.I think alcohol, being so simple a chemical structure, stays along membranes and interfers with ion channels to function allosterically to modulate many channels that are otherwise mediated by larger compounds by receptor sites, which alcohol is too small to hit specifically, but can broadly interfere with as a broad spectrum of ionic change.
This is (ethyl/drinking) alcohol (ethanol):
Just 'cause Ro15-4513 is an inverse agonist of sites (possibly upstream) of what alcohol changes to counteract alcohol; doesn't mean alcohol binds to its same site, necessarily.
^(this isn't directed at you sero, but to the point of the OP's question) that is Ro15-4513, which inversely/counteracts a lot of alcohols sedative effects. Now do you see a correlation in structure? Of course not, alcohol is too simple.
I wouldn't have written what I did if there wasn't specific evidence that there is a competitive interaction. Yes, the structures of alcohol and Ro15-4513 are completely different, but that doesn't mean that they can't interact with the same site. Someone went through the trouble of tritiating Ro15-4513 and in binding studies there was evidence of competitive displacement of its binding to GABA-A receptors by alcohol.
http://m.pnas.org/content/103/22/8546.full
I understand it wasn't directed at me, but the abstract concept you are trying to convey (that alcohol may act nonspecifically) conflicts with the evidence that I posted. And, in fact, the argument made in your post (that ethanol and Ro15-4315 are structurally dissimilar) would seem to imply that they are unlikely to have any specific interactions.Wasn't saying there isn't; as mentioned; I said that wasn't directed at you & I meant that it wasn't ;-) I am speaking of the broad spectrum of effects; regardless of whether a 'master switch' of a ligand is had for alcohol or not. Which was the concept I was trying to convey to the OP
I understand it wasn't directed at me, but the abstract concept you are trying to convey (that alcohol may act nonspecifically) conflicts with the evidence that I posted. And, in fact, the argument made in your post (that ethanol and Ro15-4315 are structurally dissimilar) would seem to imply that they are unlikely to have any specific interactions.
I thought everyone knew that alcohol doesn't act specifically, it is a very "dirty" drug.
GABA-A is probably the alcohol target that is the primary mediator of the abstinence syndrome -- hence why benzodiazepines will suppress many of the symptoms. Some of the other targets may not be all that relevant to withdrawal or may mediate side-effects. For example, 5-HT3 probably mediates alcohol-induced nausea.so to threat alcohol withdrawal and abstinence one should take pills that work on all GABA-A, NMDA, AMPA, 5-HT3, and nACh, serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine too? thats a lot of pills to do what alcohol does in simplicity