• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Durham cops use fake 911 calls to conduct warrantless searches

...

Bluelighter
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
485
http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/durham-cops-lied-about-911-calls/Content?oid=4201004

Several Durham police officers lied about non-existent 911 calls to try to convince residents to allow them to search their homes, a tactic several lawyers say is illegal. The officers targeted residences where individuals with outstanding warrants were thought to be living, and told them that dispatch had received a 911 call from that address, when no such call had been made.

However, Durham Police Chief Jose Lopez says the 911 tactic was never a part of official policy. Last month, the department officially banned the practice, according to a memo from Lopez.

The tactic came to light at a court hearing on May 27, when a Durham Police officer testified it was part of official departmental policy. The hearing involved a defendant who had been charged with marijuana possession. (The INDY is not naming the defendant because the charges against her were dropped.)

In February, Officer A.B. Beck knocked on the door of the defendant's home in South-Central Durham. When the defendant answered the door, Beck told her—falsely—that someone in her home had called 911 and hung up, and that he wanted to make sure everyone was safe. The defendant permitted Beck to enter her home, where he discovered two marijuana blunts and a marijuana grinder.

When Beck took the witness stand, he admitted to fabricating the 911 story in order to enter the house. Beck testified that his true intent was to serve a warrant, though he never produced the warrant in the courtroom.

Beck further testified that the 911 ruse was permitted under a department policy in cases where domestic violence is alleged, recalled Morgan Canady, the defendant's lawyer.

During cross-examination, Canady quizzed Beck further.

Did you say there was a 911 hang-up? she asked.

Yes, he said.

But there was not a 911 hang-up?

No.

So you entered the house based on a lie?

Yes.

And this is your policy for domestic violence warrants?

Yes.

At that point Canady made a motion to suppress the marijuana evidence. Since the defendant's consent was based on false premises, Canady reasoned, the consent was not informed and voluntary. Marcia Morey, chief district judge for Durham County, allowed the motion to suppress the evidence.

"You cannot enter someone's house based on a lie," Morey said from the bench during the hearing.

Without the evidence, the district attorney's office dropped the charges.

"People have a constitutional right to privacy, and you can't fake someone out of their constitutional rights," said Durham defense attorney Brian Aus, who was not involved with the case. "You've got to be honest about this stuff."

Ten days after the case was dropped, Chief Lopez sent a memo to all police department personnel banning the 911 ruse tactic. The department provided a copy of the memo to the INDY.

"It has recently been brought to my attention that some officers have informed citizens that there has been a 911 hang-up call from their residence in order to obtain consent to enter for the actual purpose of looking for wanted persons on outstanding warrants," said the memo. "Effective immediately no officer will inform a citizen that there has been any call to the emergency communications center, including a hang-up call, when there in fact has been no such call."

Asked why Officer Beck considered the 911 ruse tactic permissible, a police spokesperson said, "the department is looking into that."

http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/durham-cops-lied-about-911-calls/Content?oid=4201004
 
This is a super common tactic...they will pull you over and say a crime took place in the area or a similar car was spotted ext ext. Fact is cops lie all the time.
 
They do seem to enjoy selling fake drugs to street heads and then arresting them for it. I believe the formal charge is attempted possession. Lies, and beyond that. There is something wrong with the principle, perhaps there is none left.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
/facepalm

I swear, none of these revelations surprise me anymore.

Don't get me wrong, I truly enjoy reading the articles which are posted here by BLers who seem determined to end this ridiculous war, but over the past couple of years, we have seen/read/heard so many different stories - which turned out to be true - about the flagrant abuse of power that these bad apples bring to their increasingly hollow reputation as honest, professional, courteous keepers of the peace.

What does continue to shock the hell out of me is the "slap on the wrist" punishments which are given to these rotten pigs after they're caught red-handed - that is, if they're punished at all. What a disgraceful injustice. Shame, shame, fucking shame.

Men and women of integrity, my ass.

I don't dispute that there are genuinely good police officers serving and protecting their communities, and if I did in the past then I was an idiot for saying so, but damn, get rid of the bad apples please. There should a zero tolerance for this type of shit (deliberately trampling over the Constitution).
 
Last edited:
I wonder what other tactics are "part of department policy" that they use but are really not part of any policy at all?
 
Top