Oh, fencamfamine and camfentamine were both VASTLY superior to any amphetamine or cathinone I have experienced (and I have sampled many different ones. Both are vastly more lipophilic (than amphetamines and cathinones) and so the action is almost entirely on the CNS and not the body.
Many reports suggest that the subjective effects of fencamfamine are more akin to nomifensine than amphetamine and while I haven't tried nomifensine, it also demonstrates that a tertiary amine can produce an active stimulant.
In fact, I concluded that the aromatic amine that made nomifensine toxic isn't required for activity - it's added to alter the pharmacokinetics of the drug. Diclofensine has a methoxy moiety and likewise I do not believe it's required for activity but acts as a sacrificial moiety (a weak point in the structure that the body can easily metabolize).
More recent compounds such as JNJ-7925476 and McN5652 further demonstrate this AND within their patents the QSAR is examined. The latter has a para thiomethoxy moiety and like the simple amphetamines, this ring-substitution yields a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. So I would be extremely surprised if 3,4-MD ring failed to display triple reuptake inhibition.