Comparison of music between Chopin and Liszt - the two greatest composers of the Romantic era...

Antiprosynthesis

Bluelighter
Joined
May 15, 2022
Messages
1,155
Both have, when compared, similarities as well as differences; a similarity is that they both composed many works in the musical form and with the musical identity of their native land, Liszt wrote the 19 Hungarian rhapsodies and Chopin wrote many Mazurka and Polonaise (both Polish dances) - chopin even wrote his music in the way the Polish tongue creates certain sounds while speaking, bringing about lots of ornamentation in the music...

In his Mazurkas Chopin is called the alchemist cause this were highly experimental works, all written before 1849 - the year Chopin died - and still today every student jazz piano, even tho Chopin is classical music, mandatory must play the Mazurkas, cause they form the foundation of what later on would become jazz due to the entirely new way of accomodating the dominant 7 chord and the modulations...

Chopin never composed 'programmatic music' meaning he never gave titles to his compositions other than opus x nr y... All titles such as revolutionary etude or la tempesta (the storm) or heroic polonaise were all given later on by critics, however Chopin gave the hints to do so; about the revolutionary etude, composed while the russians invaded poland and Chopin got stuck in Paris while on his way to Vienna, he wrote in his journal that he had nightmares about his mother and sisters getting raped and killed by the Russians, about La Tempesta he wrote its like the stormwind rambling over the graves at night and the heroic polonaise sounded so nationalistic that while a first performance of this piece all the polish refugees in the public stood up and started singing the national anthem...

Liszt on the other hand - dont get me wrong, also Liszt composed music of the highest quality - and while both composed the most difficult and virtuoso works, Liszt made his music on purpose difficult, like crossing hands and over the top soloistic, improvisational really fast passages, in which Liszt was very progressive - he wrote in such sections no time measurment and no bars, and rubato, which with Liszt really means slowing down and speeding up both hands...

Chopin, also very progressive, was however more conservative regarding these things, his rubato, making it very unique, means that only the right hand may slow down and speed up, the left must keep the metrum giving it a classicistic 18th century air...

However, Chopin was also very progressive, he was the first composer ever to call an instrumental piece a Ballad - up until then it was a song for a king or ruler with power about his own glory... Also he redefined the Sonata, about his second Sonata was said in that time that he smuggeled 4 of his weirdest and least comprehensive works into music and simply calling at a Sonata...

Also his Etudes came as quite a shock, ppl did not believe that it was actually possible to play those pieces, because they are just that difficult and there is such a gigantic hole between the previous greatest composer, Beethoven, and Chopin - also Chopin his music is even more difficult cause not only demands it the best technique, but also musically it consists of the most complex music ever written, more complex than Liszt his music...

Liszt did wrote programmatic music, think of the piece Liebestraum (love dream) or the series of Consolations - Liszt was the first rockstar, having sex with many baronesses, doing lots of drugs, making a show of his concerts, fe example he would come on stage, calmly take the score off the pupiter of the piano, look at it and then in a serious rage ripp the score in pieces and trow them in the audience, also he had two piano's on stage, he played so powerfull that soon strings broke, he then simply moved to the other piano while on the first the strings got repaired until on the second strings broke and so he moved back; when he got old he started to regret his lifestyle and feared God would punish him so he moved to Italy and became a priest and wrote music for God like fe the Consolations I mentioned...

While all Chopin his music breathes poland, Liszt his music was more international, he among other stuff wrote a Spanish rhapsody and the very demanding Etude after Paganini La Campanella (which is an Italian village), he also wrote andalousian songs (which are actually just piano works, no singing involved)...

I could go on like this long time, but Im afraid its already such a long text almost nobody will read it, but I enjoyed myself writing it!
 
dont know much about liszt aside from that my mum plays his music from time to time. chopin also which i like.
 
also, while totally unrelated to this thread, love this piece by brahms:

 
had piano lessons as a kid, went as far as easy mozart pieces. tried the following to play some years ago, love that piece:


Both very beautiful pieces, i must say if you can play that piece with some technique and some tone quality you are not a bad pianist for someone of how i now brutally assume but suspect that you dont practice hrs in a row every day with hyperfocus, or am i mistaken?
 
i need long to read the notes and after some time i can remember such a short piece. manual dexterity is still good after the years so it works after some time. the left hand with these big intervals is not that easy to play along with the rest.
 
i need long to read the notes and after some time i can remember such a short piece. manual dexterity is still good after the years so it works after some time. the left hand with these big intervals is not that easy to play along with the rest.
Yes, reading notes like i do, simply start playing in tempo with tone quality just while your reading the score - even tho its a piece you dont know and it is the first time you see the score - is virtually impossible if you are not from a real young age spending hours a day not only practicing piano but also figuring out effective excercises to study and excercisec such boring stuff that only shows progress after some yrs like fe reading notes as fast as possible, as correct as possible and as rythmic as possible at the same time...

I have a mnemonic memory actually, at least i had, like i said i lived wild and i feel i might actually have some brain damage in the sense that without amps i severely lack focus and my memory keeps failing me... anyway, i had a mnemonic memory so when i read a book just once i fully memorized it with every dot, comma etc... included, so i didnt used to memorize my scores behind my piano anymore after some while, i made a habbit out of it to read a new score in bed right before i would go to sleep and started practicing fresh the next morning very early at the piano without score... (unless i was practicing for a concerto, meaning a performance for piano and orchestra, then but only then i used a score behind the piano...)

No, the left hand is the most difficult thing there is to master, i am quite a specialist regarding this, during my post graduate i specialized in chopin and for chopin the left hand was holy, he created like i said a unique rubato where only the right hand can speed up and slow down but the left keeps strictly the metrum, but even more important chopin revolutionarized playing music forever, like helene grimaud stated so well: chopin finally freed the left hand out of slavery... you must realize right before chopin came beethoven and up until beethoven practically all the left hand needed to do was play albertin bases over and over, mozart used plain albertin bases and beethoven upgraded that and played lets say pimped albertine bases, do a bit more complex and demanding than mozart, they stayed highly predictable, repetitive not really complex structures that simply only accompanied the melody in the right hand and i guess neverb not cary any melody itself, quite boring stuff if you must spend serious amount of time on that trying to perfect it, and then suddenly appeared the still young but already long time famous wonder child chopin with under his arm his personally copy of his first book of etudes the opus ten, and he not just ceated an upgrade, no he opened up an entirely new world where the left hand was its own entity, tho still the left hand stays, and besides copying bach which you would never be able to top plus you would be guilty of committing manierism (composing musical styles that already had their time and not composing in new innovative and experimental styles) so the only possibility is that the left hand still keeps doing somewhat more repetetive structures and some more accompanieing, none the less chopin succesfully totally transformed the left hand which now had frequent moments carrying melody, was involved in taking over some melody from the right hand and the rest was simply insanely more demanding creating the highest levels of virtuosity for the left hand...

Sorry if i got carried away, im really talkative due to speed binge and im talking about one of the greatest passions in my life for which I spent mass amounts of time and gave lots of blood, sweat and tears to not just become a professional but even then keep pushing it to always new levels...
 
I felt like quickly adding this about beethoven, dont get me wrong with that i stated the simplicity of his pimped alberti bass, he did actually compose some very demanding works too, but as far as technical difficulties go it cant really be compared to what followed, strangly enough right away over night, after him, but i also love beethoven his music, i consider it to be also some of the most genius music ever written...

I just felt like adding this cause i feared a little bit i had given the wrong idea about his music by so clearly having stated that specific simplicity and not having said anything else about his music...
 

Chopin: Fantaisie Op.49 (Kissin, Zimerman, Pollini, Rubinstein, Michelangeli et al)​


 
chopin has been one of my all time favorites for years and years; lately i've gotten very heavily into bizet, some heart- snagging beauty there.

truth be told, i am more into the late romantic/ early 20th century stuff... debussy, prokofiev, rachmaninoff, etc.

and there will always be a place in my heart for j.s. bach and vivaldi.

i haven't listened to much liszt, maybe it was the whole cocky rockstar thing that turned me off before i gave it a chance... i guess i'm biased lol
 
One of the most overarching differences in my mind is that Chopin is far more original than Liszt. In fact Liszt's best work is not his own music but his transcriptions of other people's music:



Liszt was truly a master transcriber.

I am a composer myself (I actually just won a "best original score" award for my first feature length film score) so I have of course listened to the totality of both composers catalogs. I don't really listen to either composer much these days because so much of their work is constrained/limited in instrumentation. But if I had to choose I'd probably choose Chopin as he has some truly inspired harmonic/melodic element in his work. Liszt feels far more contrived. As a composer I can hear Liszt trying, which isn't a good thing. Chopin however has moments of true inspiration that are pure and not contrived at all. Of course Liszt was quite brilliant and I enjoy playing some of his music on the piano, but he is quite overrated as a whole.

Too bad Chopin never tried his hand at any serious string quartets, etc. One true measure of a composer is their string quartets (which is where Chopin and Liszt are notably lacking).
 
Were recommended to meunbeleivale how fast

Trying to master this atm it's taking ages 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: izo
Too bad Chopin never tried his hand at any serious string quartets, etc. One true measure of a composer is their string quartets (which is where Chopin and Liszt are notably lacking).
oh man, i'd LOVE some chopin chamber music... so he never did any quartet/ quintet compositions?

anhway, his piano music is enough.

and while we are on valentina lisitsa...



the part that starts at 1:14 really shakes me up, the section that starts at 1:25 BLOWS MY FRICKIN MIND!
 
oh man, i'd LOVE some chopin chamber music... so he never did any quartet/ quintet compositions?

anhway, his piano music is enough.

and while we are on valentina lisitsa...



the part that starts at 1:14 really shakes me up, the section that starts at 1:25 BLOWS MY FRICKIN MIND!


He wrote some chamber music in the form of a trio (violin, cello and piano) but I am not aware (off the top of my head) of any piece of music of his that does not include the piano. Perhaps he did write something that didn't include the piano but I've never heard of it. So yeah, there are no Chopin string quartets etc.

Even his piano concertos (which I like and enjoy playing parts of) aren't really true piano concertos, they are more like piano solos with light orchestral accompaniment. Still enjoyable though.
 
Top