The right to learn then eventually emancipate, through the natural process of « trial & error », free of mis-guided 3rd-party predatory self-serving interference (...), is what's been confiscated in my so-called "legal" canuck province since the former Liberal government of Couillard, amplified by Legault who infantilized adults aged between 18-21 and also confiscated parental authority exactly.
Our SQdC has a societal "mi$$ion" quite incompatible with an individual's goal if we consider just the plain verifiable fact that everything marked with a *
RED* « THC » doesn't necessary contain any at all! Seriously. It's an everyday obvious absurdity, an aberration reflecting the minset of those $pe¢iali$t$/expert$ who practically ceased control of our Public Institutions, by the fault of some insatiable Public Eye watching politi¢ian$ through the iconic camera: their spines melt down instantly, there goes another century of victorian-age bigotry again and in total absence of any fair sense of proportions.
Actually the pre-emptive punishment without a crime extends even beyond 21 if we agree that this adult period may be the most proper period in human life to experiment cannabis, like it's a good idea by give a bike to kids so they get a chance to learn how to ride it, of a musical instrument even at the price of dissonances while the learning process goes on... What if 18-21 were this critical period where bigot 3rd-party mis-guided interference actually causes the most socio-toxic harm by interrupting a natural process of self-corrective evolution away from the systematic dosing abuse model presently propagated via the cigarette/joint format! M'well, provided health-wise alternatives were even promoted for starters.
Doesn't the infantilisation of adults up to 21 presently result in prejudice that extends years after, possible a lifetime assuming such socio-toxic interference nailed the natural evolution of a learning adult into the preliminary explorative phase of testing boundaries, dosing comes 1st of course. Now what if it turns out the automatic spiral scenario doesn't have to be automatic at all, that the environment can be made accomodating for adults, still aim for the UNGA$$ 2016 trio of announced goals (...) and without resorting to some symbolic hotel of sacrifices where to punish us after they've tagged us « sick », « deviant risk » or both, with a medical signature if you just ask the CSAM-SMCA, based in Calgary/Alberta.
Anyway, i wanted to point out the cannabic "initiation" needs to last a finite amount of time and denial at 21 minus 1 day is potentially impacting individuals beyond well that limit, perhaps even causing permanent prejudice after locking up vulnerable individuals into a tolerance/dependency spiral before they could get a chance to resolve it themselves.
A "chance" to try, that sound more like what i wanted to write in the start. In Québec (and Manitoba i heard) our "chances" been stolen, confiscated by law if you prefer. Meanwhile our natural rights to home-grow CBD cannabis is denied with ZERO rational base since the joint UN/WHO declaration of mid-December 2017, which should have reflected as CBD being transfered to the province's Agriculture (+fisheries and food) minister. But it's all political in the end anyway. Anything goes, we could have ended up with a clone of Donald Trump. That doesn't make life better here. Supplies are unreliable, unpredictible. Indu$trialization destroyed whatever what most "desirable" in this rare gift of dame Nature, because it might also seem desirable to a kid (0-21) and that's pure evil...
In The Name Of Children!
