Nagelfar
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2007
- Messages
- 2,527
Blood-Brain Barrier compartmentalizes / dampens overdose effects in > binary manner?
By this I mean, if it is possible (which as a loperamide addict for years, I am quite sure that it is) to "rush the gate" and get p-glyco-protein overwhelmed to get drug effects from high doses, is there a differing concentration in areas of the brain or in depth of penetration of the brain of said p-glyco-protein which make deeper drug penetration (to the automatic nervous system, breathing, heart rate, etc.) less than to the conscious / subjective cortex that would lead to a subjective "high"?
I ask this, because I just did a 45 day sentence in county jail and kicked a 200mg a day loperamide habit of about two years straight. Within one week (blood serum level lowering to the point of BBB complete impasse?) I felt fine again, much quicker than a non-p-G-protein affinity opioid, but it was an *extremely* taxing detox. I lost 45 lbs in six days, couldn't eat or get food down or drink a thing at all (got very dehydrated due to it, but amazingly, didn't get much even in the way of diarrhea on account of it, some, but maybe one time) which is like a third of my body weight, went from over 150 lbs to 113 lbs (at five foot eight inches height), in under a week. Possibly a dangerous amount of weight loss.
Now my question comes up because, when I got out of jail this past weekend, after three days I wondered what would happen if I did the same amount as before I went in (which is about what I jumped to when I got of prison two years ago from doing it sporadically), one hundred pills or 200mg in one go.
Now normally, going back to the same amount of opioid as you had been maintenancing on is easily fatal, easily something one would overdose on in one capacity or another; even if just "nodding out", well, having taken eight bottles in 48 hrs with low tolerance and only overdosing on lope at that point, I figured going back to 200mg might be safe; all that happened, was I got an extremely euphoric opiate high, e.g. my pupils were pinned, I didn't have a bowel movement for one day (had four the next day), got very 'energized but relaxed', didn't so much as nod out, and definitely didn't feel as if I was "overdosing"
Might the BBB affinity for loperamide be able to regulate it in more than an "either/or" (1 or 0, binary) manner of it "just gets into the brain" or it "just doesn't"? Might areas of the brain, the deeper, reptilian-brain ones, more necessary to the automatic functions of survival, be more likely to filter it out (more scaffolding of p-G-protein between which) than the seat of consciousness that dictates subjective experience of high?
If so, might megadoses of p-G-protein affinity opioids be largely *SAFER* than opioids that have no such affinity for that reason? My own colloquial experimenting on myself, though I admit very much original research, seems to indicate as much to me (I know how often this kind of thing is brought up by laymen, but the discussion I wish to elicit is the nature of the BBB and whether any academic research shows that this aspect of the BBB may be more complex than it is simplified and explained as)
Also, good to be back, I think this thread topic will explain where I have been for the past month and a half as well.
By this I mean, if it is possible (which as a loperamide addict for years, I am quite sure that it is) to "rush the gate" and get p-glyco-protein overwhelmed to get drug effects from high doses, is there a differing concentration in areas of the brain or in depth of penetration of the brain of said p-glyco-protein which make deeper drug penetration (to the automatic nervous system, breathing, heart rate, etc.) less than to the conscious / subjective cortex that would lead to a subjective "high"?
I ask this, because I just did a 45 day sentence in county jail and kicked a 200mg a day loperamide habit of about two years straight. Within one week (blood serum level lowering to the point of BBB complete impasse?) I felt fine again, much quicker than a non-p-G-protein affinity opioid, but it was an *extremely* taxing detox. I lost 45 lbs in six days, couldn't eat or get food down or drink a thing at all (got very dehydrated due to it, but amazingly, didn't get much even in the way of diarrhea on account of it, some, but maybe one time) which is like a third of my body weight, went from over 150 lbs to 113 lbs (at five foot eight inches height), in under a week. Possibly a dangerous amount of weight loss.
Now my question comes up because, when I got out of jail this past weekend, after three days I wondered what would happen if I did the same amount as before I went in (which is about what I jumped to when I got of prison two years ago from doing it sporadically), one hundred pills or 200mg in one go.
Now normally, going back to the same amount of opioid as you had been maintenancing on is easily fatal, easily something one would overdose on in one capacity or another; even if just "nodding out", well, having taken eight bottles in 48 hrs with low tolerance and only overdosing on lope at that point, I figured going back to 200mg might be safe; all that happened, was I got an extremely euphoric opiate high, e.g. my pupils were pinned, I didn't have a bowel movement for one day (had four the next day), got very 'energized but relaxed', didn't so much as nod out, and definitely didn't feel as if I was "overdosing"
Might the BBB affinity for loperamide be able to regulate it in more than an "either/or" (1 or 0, binary) manner of it "just gets into the brain" or it "just doesn't"? Might areas of the brain, the deeper, reptilian-brain ones, more necessary to the automatic functions of survival, be more likely to filter it out (more scaffolding of p-G-protein between which) than the seat of consciousness that dictates subjective experience of high?
If so, might megadoses of p-G-protein affinity opioids be largely *SAFER* than opioids that have no such affinity for that reason? My own colloquial experimenting on myself, though I admit very much original research, seems to indicate as much to me (I know how often this kind of thing is brought up by laymen, but the discussion I wish to elicit is the nature of the BBB and whether any academic research shows that this aspect of the BBB may be more complex than it is simplified and explained as)
Also, good to be back, I think this thread topic will explain where I have been for the past month and a half as well.