• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Belgian children, aged nine and 11, youngest ever to be euthanised

Jabberwocky

Frumious Bandersnatch
Joined
Nov 3, 1999
Messages
84,998
Paris: Two children, aged nine and 11, have become the world's youngest to be euthanised, according to a report.

The unnamed minors were administered lethal injections in Belgium, which has the world's only law allowing terminally ill children in "unbearable suffering" to choose to die. Their deaths, which occurred in 2016 or 2017, were revealed in a report from the CFCEE, the commission that regulates euthanasia in Belgium, and their ages were confirmed by an official.

It confirmed that Belgian doctors had given lethal injections to three children over the two-year period, including to a 17-year-old who was suffering from muscular dystrophy.

The nine-year-old, who had a brain tumour, and the 11-year-old, who was suffering from cystic fibrosis, were the first children under 12 to be euthanised anywhere, a member of the CFCEE told The Washington Post.

Belgium amended its euthanasia law in 2014 to make it legal for doctors to terminate the life of a child, however young, who makes the request.

They must be judged to have the mental capacity to make the decision and receive parental consent.

Luc Proot, a member of the CFCEE, defended the decision to authorise the young euthanasia cases, saying: "I saw mental and physical suffering so overwhelming that I thought we did a good thing."

For euthanasia to proceed in Belgium, doctors must first verify that a child is "in a hopeless medical situation of constant and unbearable suffering that cannot be eased and which will cause death in the short term". Once a child has expressed a wish for euthanasia in writing, child psychiatrists -conduct examinations, including intelligence tests, to determine their level of discernment and ensure they were "not influenced by a third party". Parents can, however, overrule their request.


Source: https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe...st-ever-to-be-euthanised-20180808-p4zw4l.html
 
Me too. I very strongly support euthanasia and while I can understand somebody being hung up on their age (ability to make informed decisions) it's clear that diseases/conditions don't really discriminate. To me the thought of a child being forced to endure the pain associated with certain fatal illnesses is much more tragic than an 80 year old....or even 40, 30, or 20 year old.
 
the way we keep people alive depsite quality of life in the medical feild is something genuinely creepy

if i were to have a bad stroke i just hope it takes me out in one go rather than unable to move shitting myself and choking on my food until i die for years in a nursing home with no freedom and no life

quality of life counts for something
 
Their suffering must have been truly unbearable. And with nothing else that could be done for them, is it ethical to put them out of their misery? It must absolutely be the last option, but the option should arguably be available.

I understand that there are those who'd be outraged by this, but I digress.
 
Top