"Arterial Injection Venous Return Guidance" ... as safe as regular IV" - Pubmed
My english isn't enough to sort this one out. We all know injecting into an artery is potentially lethal - say if one injects everything (as in all the solution) into the femoral artery, for example. Obviously death is much less likely if one just touches the plunger with the needle inside an artery in the hand. It's bad anyway.
There are alot of studies proving this, but just as I wondered what the **** was going on when I read that the BA of IV Buprenorphine is 98 % compared to intra-arterial
[*] ... I wonder what the **** is going on with thread title.
First I thought it had it to be an equivalent of venography, to achieve "A New Technique for Femoral Venous Access", in some strange way. But then I read:
"Through a 24-gauge peripheral artery canequivalent ula at the lower extremity for blood pressure monitoring, 2 mL of two-fold-diluted nonionic contrast was manually injected within 5 s."
And this was done in infants. 2 mL is not an insignificant amount for an adult. I don't know the corresponding amount for an adult but at the very least it would be 10 ML.
24 gauge in AN INFANT? That's like me trying to inject something with a fork.
Sure, obviously they did not inject something dangerous, and it was done to find a vein. But it could not have been water - or? Because water doesn't work like an X-ray.
So am I getting this right ... the doctors IA'd babies with an X-ray-potion, without knowing what would happen? Obviously I'm missing something, because otherwise it won't be legal. But none of the sources refer to any prior tests on adults or animals, and I googled the [first quotation in the thread's title] and this doesn't seem to be a known, established methods.
Here's the link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579799/
Am I overthinking this? I'm not clean, but am not affected by benzos/alcohol/hallucinogens at all.
*This is off topic but just to prove that I'm not spreading fake news here, coming from a delusional mind: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6115924
My english isn't enough to sort this one out. We all know injecting into an artery is potentially lethal - say if one injects everything (as in all the solution) into the femoral artery, for example. Obviously death is much less likely if one just touches the plunger with the needle inside an artery in the hand. It's bad anyway.
There are alot of studies proving this, but just as I wondered what the **** was going on when I read that the BA of IV Buprenorphine is 98 % compared to intra-arterial
[*] ... I wonder what the **** is going on with thread title.
First I thought it had it to be an equivalent of venography, to achieve "A New Technique for Femoral Venous Access", in some strange way. But then I read:
"Through a 24-gauge peripheral artery canequivalent ula at the lower extremity for blood pressure monitoring, 2 mL of two-fold-diluted nonionic contrast was manually injected within 5 s."
And this was done in infants. 2 mL is not an insignificant amount for an adult. I don't know the corresponding amount for an adult but at the very least it would be 10 ML.
24 gauge in AN INFANT? That's like me trying to inject something with a fork.
Sure, obviously they did not inject something dangerous, and it was done to find a vein. But it could not have been water - or? Because water doesn't work like an X-ray.
So am I getting this right ... the doctors IA'd babies with an X-ray-potion, without knowing what would happen? Obviously I'm missing something, because otherwise it won't be legal. But none of the sources refer to any prior tests on adults or animals, and I googled the [first quotation in the thread's title] and this doesn't seem to be a known, established methods.
Here's the link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579799/
Am I overthinking this? I'm not clean, but am not affected by benzos/alcohol/hallucinogens at all.
*This is off topic but just to prove that I'm not spreading fake news here, coming from a delusional mind: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6115924