Teo: you said yourself that you excluded things you personally felt were a combination of unsafe and not important enough in human history to warrant inclusion. Maybe 'Drugs Teo Likes' isn't exactly accurate - it's not just the compounds you personally enjoy _consuming - but it is still limited to the drugs you decide based on some undeclared standards to be 'worthy.' That makes it a lot less useful to anyone who isn't you and isn't trying to find out something about your personal opinions. If it's gonna become a stickied thread and turned into a community resource, it needs an objective standard for what counts and what doesn't. That's what I was trying to say. I'm not even saying your subjective standards are without merit, just that since they're both subjective and not declared, it makes it hard for others to know what to do with this list.
How do you define unsafe? You include tobacco, for example, which kills lots of its users (admittedly untreated tobacco is *less bad* but it's still an addictive carcinogen).
On a more pedantic note, two corrections:
1) Miracle fruit is not a psychoactive drug. The active proteins interact with your taste buds physically; they never even enter the blood stream, let alone cross the blood-brain barrier which is part of the definition of 'psychoactive'.
2) You should probably list Echinopsis as the primary name for the cacti-formerly-known-as-trichocereus and trichocereus as a synonymous name, since the Echinopsis names are now the preferred taxonomy. Also, you left off Echinopsis lageniformis (syn. T. bridgesii), possibly the most potent of the mescaline containing cacti and with a long history of native use in Bolivia.
edit: changed included -> excluded, see Teo's quote for my original brainfart