What works for some people, doesn't necessarily work for others. That AA/NA bs that people are enabling people by sticking with them is a generalized statement. Some people would be DEAD without other people's so called "enabling". JGJ is describing her valid concern for her signinficant other's health, by no means does this mean she has to leave him or give him somekind of an ultimatum "her or the booze"...Those ideas are stale. Everybody that's in some kind of recovery program is under the impression that they are somehow better and have all the answers.
Recovery is subjective and very personal, there are no 12 step miracle formulas of one size fits all.
From what she is describing, it sounds like her primary concern is his health not his drinking. Anybody that advocates leaving somebody that has a physical/psychological is propagating more harm than good.
Sounding off about your sobriety days is getting a little redundant...and pompous. (I thought you weren't going to do that)
Sorry, I mean we get it you are proud of yourself and all but c'mon man...
Enabling isn't an AA/NA concept and is acknowledged to exist in behaviors outside of drug addiction. To suggest that "enabling" is "NA/AA bs" is well... Bullshit.
Its present in SMART recovery for example:
http://blog.smartrecovery.org/2011/02/17/supporting-recovery-without-enabling/
http://blog.smartrecovery.org/tag/enabling/
http://blog.smartrecovery.org/2014/...rnatives-to-nagging-pleading-and-threatening/
Enabling in child behavior/learning:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-anatomy-addiction/201207/are-you-empowering-or-enabling
Enabling in "Adult Children"
http://www.tellinitlikeitis.net/2008/01/helping-and-enabling-is-there-a-difference.html
I never suggested she "leave" him. I suggest that she make clear that she wants him to get better and that her presence MAY be enabling him. Did you miss the point where I said that she should be ready to give tons of support when he does make a decision to take care of an issue that may well be causing physical damage to him? To me her concern appears to be that his alcohol use is causing his health problems. Yellow Eyes for example can be a very serious signal of liver failure. Liver failure is not something to fuck around with.
http://www.medicinenet.com/liver_disease/page9.htm
She also discussed hypertension, anyone who has been through alcohol withdrawal should know the increased hypertension it causes. The numbers she posted are higher then normal. Again, possible health consequences related to alcoholism.
I pointed out MY experience with MY loved ones. I also pointed out that her love isn't going to get him clean, its agreed upon in all forms of recovery that the INDIVIDUAL must want to get clean for himself/herself (loved ones can be a huge motivation). My loved ones are extremely supportive of me (in more ways then one) when I am doing what I need to do. I wouldn't be clean without it today. I am not going to even address the extremely generalized statement about "Anybody that advocates leaving somebody that has a physical/psychological is propagating more harm than good." because it would take forever to explain. Obviously, one situation does not fit all and is also ignoring one half of the situation (the person who is enabling often suffers far more then the addict).
Where did I say she/he had to attend AA/NA? I didn't. Why? Because NA/AA do not have a monopoly on recovery and I know this and have never thought it did. I might suggest people try NA/AA sure, but I will never claim its a "miracle" because it isn't. You seem to be claiming that I am some brainwashed 12 stepper, which I am far from. In fact, you are claiming I am suggesting things that I never have.
Also, please don't judge me or claim that I am "bragging" about my clean time. Nor do I feel I am "better then anyone" That isn't my intent nor have I ever done that. I don't need the personal attacks, its counterproductive to the intent of this thread. It feels like to me that you are projecting general criticism of NA/AA onto my person.
As for me counting days, I am going to do it. Sorry, you don't get to monopolize this thread nor dictate what I can and cannot post. A few weeks ago you were complimenting me, now you are pissed off about it? Makes very little sense. This is the "alcoholism discussion thread". This is "sober living", we should be able to celebrate success on this thread as much as our struggles. Furthermore, positing on this thread gives me further accountability, which helps keep me clean. I am not going to let someone who feels that it is "pompous" deter me from it. If you have noticed, it has slowed down a bit. I am proud of myself for closing in on 60 days. So of course I am posting about it.
57 days today! God willing will be at 60 Monday. Grateful to be clean today. I hope everyone is doing well and are celebrating any positive change.
I agree with your post. I had friends, acquaintances, and even complete strangers who would technically be called "enabelers" that I did drink alcohol with who would help me when I would drink way too much at a party, bar, or a few times at a live music event who would help me when I would get sick, pass out/black out, or when I needed a ride home.
I also have helped friends who are alcoholics when we were both drinking and I would stop drinking that evening after having 1-2 drinks since I later had to drive and I'd drive them home when I was sober hours later.
Enabling according to most Pyschs, Social Workers, Counselors has an element of the enabler suffering consequences rather then addict. So I personally disagree with an individual giving my drunk ass a ride home as an enabler. They were just being compassionate or had their shit together at the moment.
Now, if that individual constantly picked me up drunk and I berated them for the entire drive home and they did that over and over again then they would likely qualify as an enabler. However, if Grandma Marge goes and picks up Grandpa Joe after he has a few a few times a week and Grandpa Joe isn't having addiction issues then it wouldn't be enabling IMO.
But the definition of what is "enabling" can be subjective, when the issue is discussed in my graduate program, there are often varying opinions and definitions.