• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

US: Nevada plans execution with never-used-before drug cocktail

Jabberwocky

Frumious Bandersnatch
Joined
Nov 3, 1999
Messages
84,998
SCOTT Raymond Dozier is no ordinary death row prisoner.

The 47-year-old father and landscape gardener-turned-Las Vegas stripper is set to be executed next week in the US state of Nevada with a never-before-used cocktail of drugs.

Compared to most death row prisoners, whose life stories tend to be marked by poverty, mental disability and childhood trauma, this two-time killer had a privileged upbringing.

His father was a self-employed landscaper who worked on federal water projects throughout the American West, and Dozier moved with his parents and two siblings every few years to different suburban enclaves.

He helped his dad in the family business and got involved in Habitat for Humanity, a not-for-profit charity that builds homes for the poor, and had dreams of being a teacher.

Though Dozier rebelled early, selling weed and LSD in high school, he appeared to settle down as a young adult, marrying his high school sweetheart with whom he had a son.

After a brief stint in the military, he worked at a casino in Las Vegas, driving a chariot in a show called ?Winds of the Gods.?

By his mid-20s, Dozier was working as a stripper and doing landscaping gigs, but his primary income came from cooking and selling ice.

?I liked the idea of living outside the law,? he told Mother Jones in January.

As his drug business grew, Dozier?s life started spiralling out of control and he soon graduated from simply ?living outside the law? to murder.

A DISTURBING DISCOVERY

In April 2002, a maintenance worker noticed a ?very foul? smell coming from a dumpster at an apartment complex a few kilometres from the Las Vegas strip.

Inside was a suitcase crawling with flies and maggots. The worker opened it up to find a stinking mass of human hair, flesh and a blood-soaked towel.

Authorities were later able to match tattoos on the shoulders of the dismembered corpse to 22-year-old Jeremiah Miller, who had been reported missing a week earlier.

Investigators later found a witness who claimed to have seen a corpse in Dozier?s room.

They deduced that Dozier had offered to help Mr Miller obtain ingredients to make meth in exchange for US$12,000.

When the young man turned up, Dozier shot him and stole the cash before chopping up his body.

?His body was mutilated,? a prosecutor told the jury at Dozier?s trial.

?His arms were disarticulated at the elbows. His legs were disarticulated at the knees. His head was removed, and he was cut in half.?

An informant told police that Dozier had bragged that he had placed Mr Miller?s head in a bucket of concrete, though it was never found.

Following his arrest on June 25, 2002, Dozier was connected to another gruesome crime, the murder of Jasen ?Griffin? Green, whose remains had been found in a plastic container in the desert north of Phoenix a year earlier.

In 2005 he was sentenced to life imprisonment for killing Mr Green. He was then extradited to Nevada to stand trial for the murder of Mr Miller. He was convicted and sentenced to death on October 3, 2007.

2b3a28980216d22a16dc79f4e7ebb19d


?RISKY? PUNISHMENT FOR DOZIER?S CRIMES

On July 11, Dozier will be put to death by lethal injection ? Nevada?s first in 12 years ? with a new cocktail of drugs labelled ?risky? by critics.

One sedative will be substituted for another, and prison officials said on Tuesday they plan to use two other drugs never before used in executions in any state. The drugs include a powerful synthetic opioid that has been blamed for overdoses nationwide.

A revised and redacted death penalty protocol calls for injecting midazolam to sedate Dozier, then administering the opioid fentanyl to slow and perhaps stop his breathing followed by a muscle-paralysing drug called cisatracurium.

The third drug became the focus of a court challenge that postponed Dozier?s execution last November, after a state court judge in Las Vegas told prison officials that they could not use it.

Clark County District Judge Jennifer Togliatti ruled after federal public defenders challenging the constitutionality of the execution protocol enlisted a medical expert witness who said the drug could render a person immobile while suffocating, and ?mask? signs of struggle or pain.

The state Supreme Court rejected Judge Togliatti?s ruling in May on procedural grounds. However, justices did not rule on the constitutionality of a lethal injection method that critics characterise as experimental and risky.

Seizures are a possibility at high doses of fentanyl, said Dr Jonathan Groner, a Columbus, Ohio, surgeon and lethal injection expert. He said the combination of drugs could produce unexpected results.

?In anaesthesia, more is not always better,? Dr Groner told the Associated Press.

?Side effects can happen. Extreme doses may cause seizure or other problems. But if a person has enough paralysing agent in their system, you won?t be able to tell if they?re suffering.?

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Nevada filed a protest in state court in Carson City last week, complaining that the protocol hadn?t been made public sooner and that there isn?t more time to review the safety and legality of the execution plan.

The organisation earlier characterised the plan as less humane than the process used to put down a pet.

The court filing did not seek to delay the execution, but ACLU lawyer Amy Rose said the public deserves to know how the state plans to kill a death-row inmate.

The new execution protocol appears to be an updated version of a procedural plan submitted to Judge Togliatti last September.

The new one, dated June 11, blacks out some details, including times that family members, witnesses and media may arrive at Ely State Prison, around 400km north of Las Vegas.

It substitutes midazolam for expired prison stocks of diazepam, a sedative commonly known as Valium. The plan doubles the number of possible injections of the sedative from four for diazepam to 10 for midazolam.

The scheduled doses and delivery of fentanyl and cisatracurium were not changed.

Dozier has repeatedly said he wants to die and he doesn?t really care if he suffers.

He suspended an appeal of his conviction and death sentence, but officials said he could change his mind up to the last minute, or even after the injections start.

Dozier?s defence lawyer, Thomas Ericsson, said he knows of no such desire on his client?s part. But the lawyer said he would file a request to stay the execution if Dozier asks for it.

That possibility prompted Judge Togliatti to hold a telephone meeting with lawyers for all sides last Thursday, Mr Ericsson said.

The judge is the only official who could stop the execution.

The last execution in Nevada was in 2006, when Daryl Linnie Mack volunteered for lethal injection for his conviction in a 1988 rape and murder in Reno.


Source: https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/r...l/news-story/96b0918106460073a3294dbee30194ea
 
People don't find death sentences disturbing but at the same time they think if it is humane to do it the way they do?
 
If you've even seen a lethal injection, it is NOT without pain. Almost always there is an unexpected circumstance (patient does not respond well to sedation, or is mistakenly not fully unconscious!)

I've been starting to think a bullet to the head would be more humane than a death experiment.

How morally right are we to murder a murderer? Perhaps two wrongs make a right?
 
^qft. I’d take a .308 to the base of the skull over lethal injection any day. No suffering, no fuck ups.
 
Y’all are insane

You feel nothing but bliss when put under with fentanyl and midazolam.

Very humane. Pain free. It’s like you get the urge to go to sleep, and you do. And that’s it.
 
Still I don't get it that why bother about the method if they already are going to kill a person?
 
Sounds like an effective cocktail, as long as they use an overkill dose of both. Seems very humane as long as it's done right.
 
I'm going to chime in from the prisoner's perspective. I totally understand why he'd want to die. When I started my bit, it felt like I was never going to see the light of day again.

I understand he's a murderer and honestly I'm not going to get into the ethics of execution. I do wonder how many innocent people get put to death though, considering I've seen quite a few people get out of prison on appeal. I had a celly who was exonerated after 28 years on the inside. He killed himself about a year after he got out, but that's neither here or there.

I agree with him on this point though. I'd rather die in my 40s than serve the rest of my life in prison.
 
An eye for an eye makes who ever is dumb enough to start poking out eyes blind. I'm not stoked on capitol punishment but it's reserved for people who commit heinous acts against human well-being. If it was a more prevelant punishment i'd have a problem with it.
 
You know what I hate about the death penalty debate? How utterly dishonest it is.

We keep talking about the need for it to be humane and and painless and how lethal injection isn't painless. And its all lies.

Lethal injection is indeed painless of course, but that's not the point, that's not the goal. The goal is for it to look painless. How much pain is involved is irrelivent. That's why we used to use a drug to paralyze the condemned before execution. Not for their benefit, we could kill them fine without it. It's for the witnesses. Because people are really dumb and they think that if someone looks like they're in pain or imagine them to be suffering, then they are, even if in reality they're totally unaware of it.

The concept that someone could be unconscious but be automatically doing things as they die that have no relevence to their conscious experience is simply far too complicated for the average person, especially when they and others have a pro or anti death penalty political agenda to keep in mind. And so through such dishonesty we wind up with these crazy arguments about how painful it is for them to die of an overdose of painkillers or how aware they are through an overdose of anesthetics. It's not about the prisoners pain, for the pro or anti side. It's about trying to keep or do away with the death penalty, and both sides disregard the truth to make their political arguments. And in the process, it becomes clear that the only real priority is to make it appear painless. And how painless it actually is doesn't matter.

Just for the record, I'm opposed to the death penalty for all practical purposes. I just think politics has taken away any honesty to the argument. And I don't support using dishonesty and lies even to a political end I otherwise agree with.
 
Last-minute tussle between drug company and prison bosses halts double murderer’s execution

THE execution of a gardener turned stripper was halted on Wednesday in the US (Thursday AEST) after a drug company objected to the use of its product in putting the double murderer to death.

Scott Dozier, 47, told court officials he did not care if the lethal cocktail of drugs hurt, he just wanted his life to be over. The death-row killer said there were only so many paintings you can do behind bars.

But Clark County District Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez disallowed the use of the drug in a last-minute ruling, which came less than nine hours before Dozier was due to be executed.

It was not anti-death penalty campaigners standing between Dozier and his date with death, but a pharmaceutical firm, which does not want its drugs used in an execution.

Stocks of drugs commonly used in executions have been dwindling as their producers have refused to supply them to prisons.

So the US prison system has been getting creative, substituting the usual drugs with others that are more readily available but were never designed to be used in executions. It’s a move that’s been labelled “risky” by critics.

This was the plan for Dozier, who would be the subject of Nevada’s first execution in 12 years.

One sedative was to be substituted for another, and prison officials said last week they planned to use two other drugs never before used in executions in any state. The drugs include a powerful synthetic opioid that has been blamed for overdoses nationwide.

The spanner in the works is New Jersey based drug company Alvogen, which is adamant its sedative midazolam was illegally obtained by prison authorities and should not be used as part of the three drug combination to put Dozier to death.

On Tuesday, it filed a lawsuit in an attempt to have its drugs removed from the cocktail, accusing the state of deceptively obtaining the drug by having it shipped to a pharmacy in Las Vegas.

“Midazolam is not approved for use in such an application,” the company has said. Uses of midazolam in other states “have been extremely controversial and have led to widespread concern that prisoners have been exposed to cruel and unusual treatment,” Alvogen said.

The company said it “strongly objects to the use of its products in capital punishment” and suspects they were acquired without their true use being declared.

Ms Gonzalez ruled that Alvogen had a reasonable probability of winning its lawsuit, and she issued the temporary restraining order against the use of the drug, setting another hearing for Sept.ember10.

Alvogen said in a statement that it was pleased with the ruling and will continue to work through the legal system to ensure its products are not used in executions.

What isn’t in dispute is that Dozier is a cold-blooded murderer. He has been convicted and found guilty for killing two men.

Growing up in the state he now wants to die in, Dozier was the son of a landscaper and, when not in the army, helped out at a charity that built homes for the disadvantaged.

He married early and had dreams of becoming a teacher but, instead, found himself working as a stripper at a Las Vegas casino. His primary income came from cooking and selling ice.

As his drug business grew, Dozier’s life started spiralling out of control and he soon graduated from living outside the law to murder.

In April 2002, a maintenance worker noticed a “very foul” smell coming from a dumpster at an apartment complex a few kilometres from the Las Vegas strip.

Inside was a suitcase crawling with flies and maggots. The worker opened it up to find a stinking mass of human hair, flesh and a blood-soaked towel.

Authorities were later able to match tattoos on the shoulders of the dismembered corpse to those of Jeremiah Miller, 22, who had been reported missing a week earlier.

Investigators deduced that Dozier had offered to help Mr Miller obtain ingredients to make meth in exchange for US$12,000. But when the young man turned up, Dozier shot him and stole the cash before chopping up his body.

At the trial, the jury were told the body was “mutilated,” and the head had been removed. It was never found.

9ab9a19a479be5d94fdaa812e3511990


Following his arrest on June 25, 2002, Dozier was connected to another crime, the murder of Jasen “Griffin” Green, whose remains had been found in a plastic container in the desert north of Phoenix a year earlier.

In 2005, Dozier was sentenced to life imprisonment for killing Mr Green. He was then extradited to Nevada to stand trial for the murder of Mr Miller. He was convicted and sentenced to death on October 3, 2007.

The plan for Thursday was to sedate Dozier with midazolam, then administer the opioid fentanyl to slow and perhaps stop his breathing, followed by muscle-paralysing drug cisatracurium.

Dozier has repeatedly said he wants to die and he doesn’t particularly care if he suffers.

In November, a judge postponed his execution because of concerns the untried drug regimen could leave him suffocating, conscious and unable to move.

A second pharmaceutical company, Sandoz, also raised objections at Wednesday’s hearing to the use of one of its drugs — cisatracurium — in Dozier’s execution.

Global pharma giant Pfizer has been demanding since last year that Nevada authorities return stocks of Valium and a powerful synthetic opioid fentanyl — the third drug intended for use in the execution. But the state has so far refused to do so.

Fentanyl, which has been blamed for deadly overdoses across the country, has not been used before in an execution.

Dozier wrote in a note to the judge: “I’ve been very clear about my desire to be executed … even if suffering is inevitable.”

He reiterated his wishes to local paper the Reno Review Journal: “Life in prison isn’t a life.”

There was a limit to how much artwork and exercise a person can do in prison, Dozier said in court hearings and letters last year, according to ABC News in the US.

Drug companies have been blocking the use of their drugs in executions for a decade.

Midazolam, the drug at the centre of the court case, was substituted in May because prison stocks of Valium had run out.

Question marks remain as to whether drug firms can demand their products are not used in executions if states have managed to obtain them.

But it seems Dozier will not yet be granted his final wish — to be allowed to die for his bloody crimes.


Source: https://www.news.com.au/world/north...n/news-story/8c49fb3470801c1dbc52d437f0ab5e7a
 
You know what I hate about the death penalty debate? How utterly dishonest it is.

We keep talking about the need for it to be humane and and painless and how lethal injection isn't painless. And its all lies.

Lethal injection is indeed painless of course, but that's not the point, that's not the goal. The goal is for it to look painless. How much pain is involved is irrelivent. That's why we used to use a drug to paralyze the condemned before execution. Not for their benefit, we could kill them fine without it. It's for the witnesses. Because people are really dumb and they think that if someone looks like they're in pain or imagine them to be suffering, then they are, even if in reality they're totally unaware of it.

The concept that someone could be unconscious but be automatically doing things as they die that have no relevence to their conscious experience is simply far too complicated for the average person, especially when they and others have a pro or anti death penalty political agenda to keep in mind. And so through such dishonesty we wind up with these crazy arguments about how painful it is for them to die of an overdose of painkillers or how aware they are through an overdose of anesthetics. It's not about the prisoners pain, for the pro or anti side. It's about trying to keep or do away with the death penalty, and both sides disregard the truth to make their political arguments. And in the process, it becomes clear that the only real priority is to make it appear painless. And how painless it actually is doesn't matter.

Just for the record, I'm opposed to the death penalty for all practical purposes. I just think politics has taken away any honesty to the argument. And I don't support using dishonesty and lies even to a political end I otherwise agree with.

Do you speak from experience?

When they put me under with midazolam and fentanyl it was wonderful.

I wish I would have just died. I am sure when I pass it won’t be as nice unless I arrange for it to be so.
 
^^I can understand your opposition to the death penalty but how are we supposed to know whether a deadly cocktail will be truly painless for someone? Obviously we can't take it ourselves, i think the new cocktail of a powerful opiate and a powerful benzos is about the most peaceful death one could hope for.
 
You can certainly take those drugs at a lower dose and imagine what even more of an unconscious state might be like.

No awareness.

Pain free.

Am not opposed to the death penalty (was your post in response to Jess?)
 
Top