yepyepwoah
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2004
- Messages
- 2,671
Thanks for the detailed response. Food for thought...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/24142203/could somebody explain DOCs mechanism of action. you know, how the drug works ect. this could help me make a better decision.
then that suggests that DOC is safer than NBOMes?http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/24142203/
DOC is a selective 5ht2a/b/c agonist with a higher intrinsic activity than the "classic" psychedelics, but a lower intrinsic activity than the nbomes.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/24142203/
DOC is a selective 5ht2a/b/c agonist with a higher intrinsic activity than the "classic" psychedelics, but a lower intrinsic activity than the nbomes.
each of the historically safer drugs (DMT, LSD, and psilocybin) is non-selective and binds strongly with multiple serotonin receptor sub groups. the commonality between all of the NBOMes is that they bind selectively to 5HT2 receptors. i think the danger arises from the hyper selectivity. perhaps the other receptors the classic psychedelics bind with mediate the negative potential of 5HT2 subgroup activation. this is bad news with regard to DOC. i think that DOC has the same potential dangers as NBOMes. this is supported with the multiple confirmed fatalities from DOC. many people consumed NBOMes at high doses without complications. we don't know why certain people have fatal reactions. DOC is much less common than NBOMe drugs and i infer this is the reason fewer journals have reported DOC fatalities.
Haha. For me the DOC euphoria happens throughout usually but the peak contains emotions besides euphoria... then when the plateau hits I am absolutely immersed in a zen-like euphoria that I prefer to MDMA, etc. It's a calm, sober type of euphoria, where everything feels perfect and my mind feels like it's working perfectly. Pretty much the ideal state of mind.
I have actually taken DOC a lot, far more than once in a blue moon. For a couple of years I was taking it very frequently, multiple times a week. I've even taken it 4 days in a row - I'm not proud of this but the only negatives I experienced were increased vasoconstriction as the days went on and fatigue for a few days afterwards. I've never experienced anything alarming from DOC nor has it ever felt unhealthy. I've used it probably more than any other psychedelic, for the past 9 years.
Sorry I didn't see this until now.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945162/table/T2/
i have been considering my options. my thinking was DOC is safer than NBOMes because of the lower intrinsic activity. then i looked at the paper InterestingFACT linked. DOC does have lower intrinsic activity at 5ht2a than some NBOMe drugs. LSD and DMT both have higher intrinsic activity than NBOMes at multiple receptors. LSD is actually a super agonist at 5HT1a. from this evidence my first thought of full agonist (drugs with high intrinsic activity) being less safe than partial agonist appears wrong.
each of the historically safer drugs (DMT, LSD, and psilocybin) is non-selective and binds strongly with multiple serotonin receptor sub groups. the commonality between all of the NBOMes is that they bind selectively to 5HT2 receptors. i think the danger arises from the hyper selectivity. perhaps the other receptors the classic psychedelics bind with mediate the negative potential of 5HT2 subgroup activation. this is bad news with regard to DOC. i think that DOC has the same potential dangers as NBOMes. this is supported with the multiple confirmed fatalities from DOC. many people consumed NBOMes at high doses without complications. we don't know why certain people have fatal reactions. DOC is much less common than NBOMe drugs and i infer this is the reason fewer journals have reported DOC fatalities.