• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Soldiers, police inject drugs openly in rural Myanmar; stark sign of nation losing

Please note pmoseman's convenient avoidance of deaths caused by long-term alcohol use and related illnesses, which overshadow all other figures. What you are saying is absolute bullshit pmoseman, stop whoring yourself for the status quo.

/thread

I was waiting for someone else to rape a bleeding hole in pmoseman's argument but in the end it was me, yay!
 
Last edited:
Please note pmoseman's convenient avoidance of deaths caused by long-term alcohol use and related illnesses, which overshadow all other figures. What you are saying is absolute bullshit pmoseman, stop whoring yourself for the status quo.

/thread

I was waiting for someone else to rape a bleeding hole in pmoseman's argument but in the end it was me, yay!
I think you need to go back to the start of the argument. I have not avoided anything.
 
I've put my argument forward in the most straightforward manner I can but it is clear that nothing will change your mind. I'll leave the rest of the board to decide who is being more logical here.
 
It is not that it won't change my mind. I do not think I get what you are saying. It is very difficult for me.
 
Another thread derailed and turned to complete shit...Digging up "facts" from outdated studies and surveys to prove a "point" that has nothing to do with the OP doesn't make for a good discussion, and ruins the thread for everyone else.
 
I think you need to go back to the start of the argument. I have not avoided anything.

You avoidance the largest category of deaths, to which weed contributes zero. This invalidates your argument but I know only a bullet would change your mind so keep drinking.
 
Nothing I wrote is invalid. Keep dreaming.

Alcohol causes liver damage. Tens of thousands of people a year have their lives cut short. It also contributes to many accidental deaths.

Read what else I already stated and accept it for what it is. Reality. There is nothing you can do about it but ignore it and laugh, thinking you are smart.

The topic got derailed because people used the topic to blather their uneducated and totally unrelated opinions. I address the bullshit and new arguments rise up because I hammer right through them.

Prepare something with actual information and some kind of argument, or ask a decent question that is more than a trivial insult, or get back on topic.

I am not the topic. Stay out of my argument if you have nothing to add. It should be obvious by now I won't be frustrated by interruptive behavior, be convinced by some crap you read on the internet somewhere, or trade insults with you.
 
We expect automobiles to kill people because of what happened the year before. Do you think this makes anyone happy?

They haven't banned automobiles and they haven't banned prescription drugs either, which are the cause of the increase in drug related deaths. Why? Because law abiding citizens who use these products benefit from them without taking on too much risk.

Non-law abiding citizens use drugs without taking too much risk too, evidenced by the fact that on a per capita basis they don't kill that many more people than automobiles - or alcohol, prescription drugs, guns etc etc etc

Your argument is bunk.

People take risks all the time. The only difference here is the distorted moral argument that somehow adults can't be allowed to take risks in the name of self gratification. It's a hang-up from the Victorian era, one htat you seem to embrace with great enthusiasm.

Well, you can take your moralistic wowserism and shove it right up you clacker as far as I'm concerned.
 
Prepare something with actual information and some kind of argument, or ask a decent question that is more than a trivial insult, or get back on topic.

I did, in the last thread you started where you made some wild-eyed accusation that NORML were distorting data to fit their nefarious pro drug agenda - when I pointed out that the source material absolkutely supported NORML and that you were off on some crazed tangent and looking at the wrong paper you promptly deleted the thread.

I don't think you should be preaching to anyone else on this forum about how educated they are, or the quality of their arguments. You're not even honest enough to simply admit you made a mistake. I guess that's the kind of psychological impulse you have to have to come onto a drug HR forum and try to proselytize your twisted prohibitionist worldview.
 
^You are one of the most dull, uninspiring, long-winded posters on Bluelight. You don't "win" arguments...What you do is the verbal equivalent of "creating a traffic jam"...and thatr 's not an insult, that's the truth.

" hammering right through them"? That's comical! I haven't read one thing you've wrote that's "hammered through" anything! You just come with a boatload of nonsensical links that you think supports your "argument", but the problem is, you never have any actual point that you're trying to make! You merely try to contradict whatever you think the popular opinion is.

You're like a little child dragging their feet and refusing to go to bed...

Come up with an argument based on your own knowledge and idealogy, and learn to actually refute things directly, instead of just being a contrarian.
 
I did, in the last thread you started where you made some wild-eyed accusation that NORML were distorting data to fit their nefarious pro drug agenda - when I pointed out that the source material absolkutely supported NORML and that you were off on some crazed tangent and looking at the wrong paper you promptly deleted the thread.

I don't think you should be preaching to anyone else on this forum about how educated they are, or the quality of their arguments. You're not even honest enough to simply admit you made a mistake. I guess that's the kind of psychological impulse you have to have to come onto a drug HR forum and try to proselytize your twisted prohibitionist worldview.
I deleted it. Thanks for helping me locate my error.

I suggest you forget about it.
 
^You are one of the most dull, uninspiring, long-winded posters on Bluelight. You don't "win" arguments...What you do is the verbal equivalent of "creating a traffic jam"...and thatr 's not an insult, that's the truth.

" hammering right through them"? That's comical! I haven't read one thing you've wrote that's "hammered through" anything! You just come with a boatload of nonsensical links that you think supports your "argument", but the problem is, you never have any actual point that you're trying to make! You merely try to contradict whatever you think the popular opinion is.

You're like a little child dragging their feet and refusing to go to bed...

Come up with an argument based on your own knowledge and idealogy, and learn to actually refute things directly, instead of just being a contrarian.

Thank you... Is there a precedent for someone who continually derails threads, turning them into shit for them to get some kind of a warning from moderators to stop filling the board with bullshit? Is there anything that can be done for pmoseman and people like it (who will likely join when it's banned) to ruin every discussion on this board? Is there a way to "nip this in the bud"?
 
I deleted it. Thanks for helping me locate my error.

I suggest you forget about it.

You want me to conveniently forget about you intellectual dishonesty in deleting threads when you get proved wrong? Well, I can certainly see why you'd WANT that to be so...
 
^Ha, no!

Pmoseman has just as much right to post on BL as anyone else, and has a right to whatever opinion she pleases. But continually derailing every thread is not something I think could go on forever, but I could be wrong!

I wish pmoseman would just state her opinion on certain issues, instead of just attempting to discredit everyone else.
 
Opi8, if such rules existed you would be the first one to go. You supposedly have me on ignore but continue to make comments about me without having any idea what I am saying and are spamming the message board.

Blues Hues, I cannot just make up statistics.

You want me to conveniently forget about you intellectual dishonesty in deleting threads when you get proved wrong? Well, I can certainly see why you'd WANT that to be so...
You are actually calling me intellectually dishonest for deleting that thread?

I deleted it because it had misinformation in it.

I did not delete it because I made an error.

Look at the top of page 3 on this thread.

Are you done making accusations?
 
Blues Hues, I cannot just make up statistics.

Oh yeah you can, especially if you can just conveniently delete when someone factchecks said "statistics"


You are actually calling me intellectually dishonest for deleting that thread?

Yes.

I deleted it because it had misinformation in it.

Yes. Misinformation that you were trying to promulgate.

I did not delete it because I made an error.

No, rather because you got caught out, more like it

Are you done making accusations?

Are you done with lying and obfuscating in order to push your contrarian agenda?
 
I am not lying. Would you care to bring the thread back up so I can show everyone how wrong you are?
 
Nothing I wrote is invalid. Keep dreaming.

Alcohol causes liver damage. Tens of thousands of people a year have their lives cut short. It also contributes to many accidental deaths.

Read what else I already stated and accept it for what it is. Reality. There is nothing you can do about it but ignore it and laugh, thinking you are smart.

The topic got derailed because people used the topic to blather their uneducated and totally unrelated opinions. I address the bullshit and new arguments rise up because I hammer right through them.

Prepare something with actual information and some kind of argument, or ask a decent question that is more than a trivial insult, or get back on topic.

I am not the topic. Stay out of my argument if you have nothing to add. It should be obvious by now I won't be frustrated by interruptive behavior, be convinced by some crap you read on the internet somewhere, or trade insults with you.

Your entire premiss is invalid, you only serve to smear your own vaginal discharge over prevailing opinions and try to distort established reality. All you do on this forum is friction-burn your HPV infected clitorus to your own false sense of intellectualism. I can't believe you accuse me this. It is like arguing with a creationist you just cannot accept the fact that you are an ignoramus who doesn't know anything. Your points keep getting progressively more nebulous and vague while your "evidence" gets more abstract and extraneous. BlueHues summed you up pretty well. YOU are the one who keeps getting hammered through by everyone else yet each time your vagina becomes more calloused as your egotistical, pretentious delusions become more entrenched.
 
Top