• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

War on Drugs a Success

pmoseman

Bluelighter
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
1,574
War on Drugs a success
By Peter Bensinger June 10, 2011 6:22PM


"Jesse Jackson’s recent column 'on a failed war on drugs' demands a rebuttal based on science and the facts. Rev. Jackson, to his credit, has preached against using drugs, but his conclusion that the drug control effort has been wasted is dead wrong.

In fact, in 1978, 25 million Americans used an illegal drug once a month, when our population was 280 million. In 2009, there were 21 million illegal drug users, a decrease of 20 percent. Since when is a 20 percent decrease a failure?

Ninety-two percent of Americans do not use illegal drugs. Drugs are not as available as they were 40 years ago, and fewer people are dying of heroin overdose deaths.

I know because from 1976 to 1981, I was administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. In 1976, we had more than 500,000 heroin addicts and over 2,000 heroin overdose deaths. This has decreased significantly; currently there are 200,000 heroin users, less than half the number of 35 years ago and half the heroin overdose deaths.

Our prisons are overcrowded; not because casual users of marijuana are in prison. Less than 1 percent of all inmates in state prisons are there because of the use or possession of marijuana. They are in prison because of other charges, some involving drugs but for sale or trafficking. They are also there because we do not have enough drug courts, which have recidivism rates of 16 percent compared to 45 percent for offenders not in those programs. They are in prison because we have a probation system that is ineffective and because we tolerate a high crime rate and have more gun dealers than gas stations.

Drugs are addictive, cause impairment with work, learning, co-ordination, short-term memory, and long-term health. Legalize cocaine and crack, which cause rapid heart rate, arrhythmia and three overdose deaths a day? Legalize marijuana, which contain 468 different chemicals and 60 percent more cancer-causing agents than a cigarette and is particularly harmful for brain development in adolescents? Drugged driver fatalities are three times higher in states with medical marijuana.

The effort to control drugs is not solely a law enforcement responsibility. It requires greater efforts by parents, more resources in prevention and treatment and effective diversion programs, which Rev. Jackson recognizes. Chicago’s St. Patricks High School has implemented a mandatory random testing program for all students, not just athletes. The result is higher graduation rates, better attendance, higher college admissions and fewer disciplinary problems than other comparable schools.

Not all efforts involve taxpayer money. The private sector has driven down drug use in the workplace dramatically, not by avoiding the issue but with clear drug abuse policies, education, drug testing and employee assistance programs. Productivity rates have risen significantly.

The federal government has invested time and money and lives in fighting drug abuse, but the social costs for treatment, lost productivity, accidents and crime are 10 times higher. In fact, this year’s federal drug enforcement budget is the same as the cost of one Aegis Cruiser for the Navy. Drug abuse is a public health problem, but removing criminal sanctions will open the floodgates of use and abuse. Use of illegal drugs is lower by 20 percent from 30 years ago. We need to do more in prevention and treatment, including having Rev. Jackson preach about the dangers of drug abuse without giving up on our commitment to prevent it.

Peter Bensinger was administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administrationfrom 1976-1981 and director of the Illinois Department of Corrections from 1970-1973."

Nothing can directly refute these facts. Tired of these kids comparing a lot of pot smokers' minor convictions and a few major criminals being put away for the life sentence they deserve with "harmless" drugs, without to explain it themselves.
 
Last edited:
Drug abuse is a public health problem, but removing criminal sanctions will open the floodgates of use and abuse

Alternatively, we could add criminal sanctions for other health problems than drug use. I'm sure that nobody would object to this!
 
"Drugs are not as available as they were 40 years ago, and fewer people are dying of heroin overdose deaths." your right they are everywhere.. I love fiction... but its better to read literature than propaganda.

"Peter Bensinger was administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration from 1976-1981 and director of the Illinois Department of Corrections from 1970-1973.""

Denial it not just a river in Egypt..
 
Last edited:
I have seen a few of those percents before. 92% Americans don't use illicit drugs and 60% more carcinogens in marijuana.

I would pay attention to what he is saying, don't disregard the facts simply based on who is speaking. What you think he is implying. See if you can actually find any of the statements he made to be actually false.
Don't bend the truth, go word for word. I bet you a beer you can't.
 
Last edited:
Drug prohibition in the U.S. started in 1914, arbitrarily choosing 1978 as a date to compare current drug usage rates to makes no sense.
 
92% Americans don't use illicit drugs and 60% more carcinogens in marijuana.

So if I only use cannabis via eating it or a vaporiser and I don't use any tobacco (I dont smoke anything), there's still 60% more carcinogens in cannabis? Really? 60% more than what exactly?
 
Drug prohibition in the U.S. started in 1914, arbitrarily choosing 1978 as a date to compare current drug usage rates to makes no sense.
He did not choose that timeframe. That was his response to commemts made by Jesse Jackson and it is also not an arbitrary choice, "This month marks the 40th anniversary of the day Richard Nixon launched the "War on Drugs."... Four decades later, it would be impossible to invent a more complete failure..."
 
Last edited:
than the war on drugs.. I agrree
Ya man. I was quoting Jessie Jackson. That is exactly what he was saying.
So if I only use cannabis via eating it or a vaporiser and I don't use any tobacco (I dont smoke anything), there's still 60% more carcinogens in cannabis? Really? 60% more than what exactly?
Tobacco. I am paraphrasing the article and answering a question for a man who read the article. I am not trying to rewrite the entire article down here.
 
You cannot say that the statistics prove that the war is a success unless you see the experiment that would be the war ending and continued use statistics studied. This is where you bring up the Portugal situation. After they decriminalised everything and reformed their policy, use actually went down significantly. Now if Portugal kept its war going and there was a slight reduction, but not nearly the reduction as in the decriminalisation case (that has actually happened), this would not be a "win" for the war. The setup that causes the greatest reduction in use (or whatever quantifiable stat) is the winner, and I think the point is that legalisation/decriminalisation models will always reduce use/harm more than punitive measures.

You're not "winning" if there is an alternative solution that would handle the situation much better.
 
Its a war on drug users. Its a war on people. They confiscate drugs but they incarcerate human beings. And I don't know about you guys but I'm not even on the scene and I can get most anything. Drugs are everywhere and they are expensive but not inaffordable. War on drugs is a massive fail.
 
Didn't America say they won the war in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan too? (Maybe they admitted defeat in Vietnam, I really don't know.)
 
America doesn't lose wars...it just makes whole regions inhospitable irradiated disaster zones with traumatised, radicalised populations.
Nothing to see here, move along fella.
"Mission Accomplished". Nice one, Dubya.
 
You cannot say that the statistics prove that the war is a success unless you see the experiment that would be the war ending and continued use statistics studied. This is where you bring up the Portugal situation. After they decriminalised everything and reformed their policy, use actually went down significantly. Now if Portugal kept its war going and there was a slight reduction, but not nearly the reduction as in the decriminalisation case (that has actually happened), this would not be a "win" for the war. The setup that causes the greatest reduction in use (or whatever quantifiable stat) is the winner, and I think the point is that legalisation/decriminalisation models will always reduce use/harm more than punitive measures.

You're not "winning" if there is an alternative solution that would handle the situation much better.
I don't agree. The number of people in Portugal who have used drugs has increased each year and use also increased in surrounding countries because Portugal is where drugs enter that region. source: UNODC 2013 World Drug Report
 
^Exactly how does one come up with accurate numbers from a completely hidden population that goes to great lengths to hide their activities?

I hate the "citation" game that people play...It's complete and utter bullshit..Nobody knows for sure...This isn't a "Gallup poll"...
 
Hey, anti-drug drug forum poster, did America win the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan wars?
 
Legalize marijuana, which contain 468 different chemicals and 60 percent more cancer-causing agents than a cigarette and is particularly harmful for brain development in adolescents? Drugged driver fatalities are three times higher in states with medical marijuana.

I better stick to alcohol and tobacco then hey, and stop thinking about using cannabis ever again even though it's been about 3 months since I last used it. Alcohol and tobacco sound so much safer after reading that. Cannabis is the culprit. Now I know.
 
As the former head of the DEA, Peter Bensinger's uncited, biased article contains about as much credibility as the amount of gold found in my shit - even when I sprinkle gold bits on my cookies.

If you wanna present a compelling argument about a war on the pursuit of happiness, and a war on freedom of choice, and a war on several other basic human rights, you should know better than to go to Michele M. Leonhart's predecessor for help - because she's a shining example of an idiot, and I imagine opposites do not attract in law enforcement.

Nice try, but I wouldn't trust the DEA (present or former) to wipe my ass, let alone try to convince me what's true, and what's not when it comes to street drugs. I made that mistake one too many times - starting with when I believed as an adolescent that marijuana was the "gateway drug."

Well guess what, after decades of intimate, first-hand experience with both booze and weed - I'll swear on whatever it is you wish me to swear upon that alcohol made me crave other highs in a way I have never experienced with weed - not even fookin' close. And I have smoked some of the best weed on the planet (and some of the worst - most likely oregano). And the result was always the same: "I'm so hungry! Hehehe!"

I wish I had more hands, so I could give this article 4 thumbs down!
 
Top