backindauk
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2003
- Messages
- 163
Just reading back over a few posts from "back in the day" (2003 - haha), i stumbled upon this question which was in a thread with someone saying how bored they were with the Red Threes (the best pills i've ever had)
and BT replied
It really asked me, is the logo that is on someone's pill more important than the contents these days?
All i hear is people saying "i got some (green mitsubishis or something like that) and i hear they are amazing". Later i get this "Worst pill ever".
I think BT really shed some light on a great ideal, what if everyone had testers to actually check what was in their "wicked" pills, and their not so wicked pills (worst pill ever).
PS: Bring back the Red/Orange Threes. I miss them dearly, no matter how jaded it sounds - i have not since had a pill that was near the quality of those!
originally posted by shalI wonder if as many people would take pills if they had no colour or press. If they were just plain white, flat, boring white... Colors and press are used to keep people interested! Hehehe..
and BT replied
^ and to discriminate between batches - imagine how infuriating it would be if every pill looked identical, but you never knew what was in them? Bet everyone would buy testers then Pill logos and colours just allow information to spread about different batches by word of mouth.
It really asked me, is the logo that is on someone's pill more important than the contents these days?
All i hear is people saying "i got some (green mitsubishis or something like that) and i hear they are amazing". Later i get this "Worst pill ever".
I think BT really shed some light on a great ideal, what if everyone had testers to actually check what was in their "wicked" pills, and their not so wicked pills (worst pill ever).
PS: Bring back the Red/Orange Threes. I miss them dearly, no matter how jaded it sounds - i have not since had a pill that was near the quality of those!