• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

U.S. - The Authors of the CDC's Opioid Prescribing Advice Say It Has Been 'Misimplemented' in a Way That Hurts Patients

S.J.B.

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Jan 22, 2011
Messages
6,886
The Authors of the CDC's Opioid Prescribing Advice Say It Has Been 'Misimplemented' in a Way That Hurts Patients
Jacob Sullum
Reason
April 24th, 2019

In a New England Journal of Medicine commentary published today, the authors of the opioid prescribing guidelines that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued in 2016 reiterate the agency's recent warning that it does not recommend abrupt or nonconsensual tapering for patients who are already taking high doses of narcotic analgesics for chronic pain. "Unfortunately, some policies and practices purportedly derived from the guideline have in fact been inconsistent with, and often go beyond, its recommendations," write Deborah Dowell, Tamara Haegerich, and Roger Chou. Those policies and practices, they say, include "inflexible application of recommended dosage and duration thresholds and policies that encourage hard limits and abrupt tapering of drug dosages, resulting in sudden opioid discontinuation or dismissal of patients from a physician's practice."

Dowell, Haegerich, and Chou warn that patients forced to reduce their doses "could face risks related to withdrawal symptoms, increased pain, or unrecognized opioid use disorder" and "if their dosages are abruptly tapered may seek other sources of opioids or have adverse psychological and physical outcomes." They also worry that doctors are responding to the CDC's advice about the potential risks of opioids by "dismiss[ing] patients from care" or declining to prescribe opioids at all, "even in situations in which the benefits might outweigh the risks." Dowell et al. say "such actions disregard messages emphasized in the guideline that clinicians should not dismiss patients from care, which can adversely affect patient safety, could represent patient abandonment, and can result in missed opportunities to provide potentially lifesaving information and treatment." And they note that the guidelines have been improperly applied to "patients with pain associated with cancer, surgical procedures, or acute sickle cell crises."

The CDC's recognition that misinterpretation of its guidelines has resulted in needless suffering, patient abandonment, and "adverse psychological and physical outcomes" (including suicide) is welcome, if overdue. "This article should allay anxiety among physicians who prescribe responsibly for patients with chronic pain," says Sally Satel, a Washington, D.C., psychiatrist who helped organize a March 6 letter to the CDC in which hundreds of health professionals and addiction specialists, including three former drug czars, expressed concern about the unintended consequences of the CDC's advice. "No longer can any clinician, insurer, health care system, or pharmacist claim 'the CDC Guideline says' when it comes to tapering or discontinuation."

Stefan Kertesz, a University of Alabama at Birmingham pain and addiction specialist who worked with Satel on the letter to the CDC, was also heartened by the NEJM article. "We needed CDC and its guideline's authors to do precisely what they have done, which was to speak with vigor and clarity to the pressing ethical concern we laid out in our letter," he says. "In affirming that the guideline did not call for hard dose cutoffs and forced tapers, the guideline's authors have effectively called for recalibration of policies by insurers, by Medicaid authorities, and by agencies that have set 'the number of patients above a given dose' as the primary indicator of bad care."

The letter to the CDC included testimony from hundreds of patients who have suffered the consequences of that ham-handed approach. "The trauma to patients who have been living in terror these past three years nearly broke my heart many times," Kertesz says. "The only possible step has been for people familiar with the nexus of science and health policy to speak openly about the problems we have seen, and to trust that most people ultimately want to do what's right."

Read the full story here.
 
And on top of all that, the traditional boundary between low and moderate chronic opioid agonist therapy for chronic pain is 200 mg morphine sulphate PO equivalent per 24 hours., not 90 mg. I cannot help but get this visual of a chronic pain patient in the One Gramme Club being cut off cold turkey and keeling over from a heart attack later the same week . . . and their claim about opioids lessening lifespan -- tell that to William S Burroughs and the Johns Hopkins founder who died of old age after 65 years on morphine and the chronic pain patients on it from before the Harrison Narcotics Act, German Opiumgesetz and so forth who lived into the 21st Century.,

Two people recently have asked me if Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Russia, countries in Continental Europe or the Pacific Rim would take American chronic pain patients as asylum seekers. I do not know, but I think somebody should really try it out. I don't think that situation is ever going to get better.
 
Last edited:
Said it before but government needs to stay the hell out of doctor's business.
 
Said it before but government needs to stay the hell out of doctor's business.

Yes -- I have always said about that situation that if politicians, law enforcement people, and media people want to practise medicine and/or pharmacy that they should have to go to medical or pharmacy school just like everybody else. It would be just like some regular citizen getting bad information about some issue and trying to tell the cops how to do their jobs. How long would a situation like that last before they get ticked off and cart the citizen off to gaol?

I have to say, the stories I have been hearing curl my hair -- doctors become doctors and nurses become nurses largely because they are compassionate and care about people; those who have less sublime motives probably wash out the first year of medical school, no? Who wants an organisation with the compassion of the Internal Revenue Service, the subtlety of the Department of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, the efficiency of the Pentagon purchasing department and the purity of intention of the most toxic members of the United States Senate and House of Representatives to be deciding their daily treatment regimen for a debilitating and soul-crushing situation that they did not bring upon themselves, more likely than not?

Trying to ban extended-release hydrocodone without the paracetamol? Any doctor worth his or her salt has the attitude of "Hey, 'Herr Doktor' Manchin and 'Professor' Ayotte, go fork yourselves" What happened to the scientific method? What happened to separation of powers? What happened to subsidiarity? What happened to due process of law? How about some humility? It sounds like those folks do not care about the truth, and I have talked to folks who feel outrage at being patronised by these people pretending to care about these people on opioids. I know what I'd say: "no you don't, you bloodsucking lawyer, corrupt politician, lazy and gullible 'journalist', you are on a power trip that is killing people with fentanyl derivatives and benzamides and benzimidazoles and sedatives, and myocardial infarction, and suicide. STFU"
 
Last edited:
SOMEONE AT THE CDC NEEDS TO BE FIRED. UNNACCEPTABLE THAT THIS WEMT ON THIS LONG WITHOUT CORRECTION
 
Top