Lava-
I agree with the purpose of this forum, and I feel that purpose is very valuable. I think the reason the whole debate existed is because people disagree about what constitutes "support." I would just like to point out that I think everyone had the best interests of this forum in mind. A lot of people thought that I was arguing just to argue, but the only reason I posted is because I felt that people could benefit more from this forum if the members refined their comments. I am interested in people getting the most out of this forum.
That said, there appears to be 2 schools of thought to this issue. The first, which appears to be the status quo and more popular idea, is that posters here should recieve unconditional love and support. This may be best for a majority of the posters in this forum. A lot of people are reaching out to others and simply making connections with others is exactly what they need.
The other school of thought, to which I subscribe, is that there are occasional cases in which a poster would benefit more by others pointing out the err of his or her ways. I think there is a fine line to be drawn between offering support and condoning self-destructive behavior.
Utlimately, I think this board should really strive to implement the best of both worlds. Each post should be considered independently, and neither school of thought should be strictly adhered to.
And finally, I would like to address the issue of insensitivity that is inherent in the second school of thought. Personally, I took a lot of heat for being insensitive. I, personally, will be more sensitive, so long as the moderators and others recognize that for the second school of thought to work at all, there must be a bit of "tough love" on this board.
The ultimate purpose of this board is to help people. To do so, a balance must be struck. That is all I have to say.
For now, anyway.