Our electrical application,
Where the cues "jealous union, love" - they're coding our neural function (optimizing it's firing by way of emotion), thus the cell itself represents a neuron.
So here's our neural/cellular membrane, and the cues represent the depolarization or essential activation of the electric cell.
Thus responsible for action potential creation/propagation,
i.e. responsible for generation of electricity.
Causes the nerves to fire.
To, "light that woman up", i.e. to apply that electricity such that she can feel it, that requires,
Contact;
Thus our nerves our coded with "jealous union, love",
- A
high/polarizing emotion (positive pole)
-
Electrolyte (ion channel - separating positive and negative poles)
- A
depolarizing emotion, intimate emotion where the high emotion discharges into (negative pole).
Then we simply have to ensure contact between ourselves and them,
i.e. nerve to nerve contact.
"
Force", seems to be the optimal means to achieve this, it renders the best/closest contact.
("Energy" doesn't really make contact with them; "control" is not intimate contact thus doesn't transfer electricity; "incite" is like proding, again doesn't really make contact with them, etc; "Force" makes excellent intimate, up-close-and-personal contact with them, thus excellent electrical transference).
And in the behavioral sense, it seems to be required as of course, there's gonna be an element of resistance to being electrocuted.
Not to mention, under pleasurable circumstances, chicks love a man getting intimately physical with them and just that, being forceful with them..... under pleasurable circumstances of course.
They like that feeling of a big man being all up in their space.
Reason being, it represents that contact.
So essentially this is stimulating their nerves;
electricity of our nerves, making intimate/up-close-and-personal contact with their nerves - sexual gratification is
afferent nerve stimulation.
Electricity, making optimal contact with them = afferent nerve stimulation = optimal sexual gratification.
**
"
Jealous union, love force" = electrical stimulation = optimal sexual gratification + attraction.
As an after thought, conventionally interpreted "intelligence" - I'm beginning to strongly contend that intelligence is largely a function of interest, work ethic, and ability to apply oneself.
This in turn will be a product of neural well being/optimization.
i.e. if neurons fire well, they make junctures with each other easier, thus information is more easily encoded.
Additionally we're more active, perceptive, alert, interested.
Neurons firing well is, by our outlay, based on emotionality.
Cumulatively that is to say,
emotional intelligence is the true underlying denominator of conventional intelligence.
- Emotional intelligence
- Emotional well being
- Emotional insights etc.
How we understand, think about, apply and behave according to these concepts, dictates conventional ability to process data, i.e. dictates conventional intelligence.
Perhaps could say further that if one were to characterize ones emotional state, we could call it, "personality".
i.e. ones behavior is a product of their emotional process, which we conventionally refer to as their personality (
all underwritten by their "thinking" - i.e. Thoughts-emotions-actions, T.E.A. psychological concept).
Therefore, we could say - intelligence is a function of personality.