• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: swilow | Vagabond696

NEWS: "the list"- Scientific Accuracy not Scaremongering

phase_dancer

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Mar 12, 2001
Messages
6,179
The List is a multi-disciplinary collaboration of professionals committed to honesty and scientific accuracy in the debate on drugs policy. It was established in 2004, and publicly launched at the Club Health Conference in Sydney in 2005. Its creation was in response to the worrying departure in political circles from the accepted tenets of 'harm minimisation', focusing as it does on reducing injury, illness and death, towards the rhetoric of prohibition and the morality of drug use.

The membership of "The List" is a growing group drawn from such disparate areas as medicine, scientific research, law enforcement, state and local government, peer education groups and user advocates, but all committed to the Australian tradition of harm minimisation.

The List exists to ensure that the Australian public is provided with the scientific and medical facts regarding illicit drugs and drugs policy. Where necessary it will refute misrepresentation of drugs policy or science by any party; political, media-related, or religious. Armed with the facts, the Australian public can make rational decisions about how to stop young Australians succumbing to the harms of drug use. It is entirely acceptable for there to be a moral dimension in the debate on drugs; it just shouldn't be misrepresented as science.

Posted by johnboy on October 22, 2006 8:08 PM
About "the list"


Science:
Science in the broadest sense refers to any system of objective knowledge. In a more restricted sense, science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge based on the scientific method, as well as to the organized body of knowledge humans have gained by such research.


Scaremongering
Scaremongering is a neologism referring to statements aiming for a scaring effect, such in:
  • A method of media hype and 'bigger is better' headline
  • The thoughtless, consequence-ignored, and largely inaccurate statement of information that is written to steer the readers to the writer's point of view. Usually well-written, and using industry standard terms and figures, the reader is moderately or greatly frightened by the potential outcome of the event.
  • In over 75% of these articles, small facts may be accurate, but an exaggerated scare effect is added to get the writer's name and credibility in headlines for his/her "ten minutes of fame."
  • Users of the word typically believe that both the media and the government thrive on this type of unnecessary stress and strain in meeting current agendas.

Taken from Wikipedia entries: Science Scaremongering
 
Drug experts to monitor MPs

LAURA ANDERSON, CANBERRA

December 09, 2006 01:15am


FEDERAL politicians have been put on notice to get their facts right about drugs.
A group of Australian medical researchers is vowing to publicly name and shame MPs who make deliberately misleading or inaccurate statements about drug use.

Royal Adelaide Hospital emergency research fellow and prominent drug test campaigner Dr David Caldicott will be one of the convenors of the group of about 15, who will call themselves "The List".

The group will consist of medical researchers, scientists, forensic workers and law enforcement officers.

The group was given the green light at a meeting in Canberra yesterday of the Australian Parliamentary Group for Drug Law Reform, which consists of Labor, Liberal, Greens and Democrats members.

"We will put federal politicians on notice," Dr Caldicott said.

"The majority of what is being preached by right-wing politicians is incorrect.

"There is so much lying about drugs and drug policies.

"It is being introduced by politicians who have no understanding of the scene."

Dr Caldicott said media outlets also would be corrected when they made incorrect statements.

Meanwhile, state Liberal frontbencher Isobel Redmond will join Democrats state leader Sandra Kanck at a big rave party in Adelaide today.

Ms Kanck invited state and federal MPs to join her at the Summer Enchanted Rave party - with Ms Redmond, the Opposition's legal affairs spokeswoman, the only MP to accept the invite.

Ms Redmond said she accepted the invitation - her first visit to a rave - so she could speak to young people and try to get a greater understanding of the issue.

"The least we can do is give all the young people the courtesy of listening to their views and trying to understand that whole subculture," she said.

Ms Kanck, who yesterday received her pass for the Adelaide Showground event, welcomed Ms Redmond's attendance.

"It is really fantastic that she is prepared to do that, she knows what I was put through," she said.

Ms Kanck said she would use the event to again call for ecstasy pill testing.


From news.com.au



Doctor hits out at govt drug policies

PM - Friday, 8 December , 2006 18:45:00

Reporter: Annie Guest


MARK COLVIN: And as you heard, there's a link between the violence in emergency rooms, and drugs. And if there is a "war on drugs", as politicians often say there is, then its frontline is in the emergency wards of Australia's hospitals.

Now a senior emergency doctor has taken direct aim at the politicians.

Royal Adelaide Hospital's Dr David Caldicott says Federal and State Government drug policies are largely populist, and don't work.

He's told a Parliamentary Group for Drug Law Reform that there's no scientific evidence to support the war on drugs.

Afterwards, Annie Guest asked Dr Caldicott why he thought politicians approached the drug issue in the way they did.

DAVID CALDICOTT: I think they're turning to populist knee-jerk type policies, rather than looking at real issues that cause a reduction in the drug use, the drug harm and the number of deaths caused by drugs.

ANNIE GUEST: Well, if we take Federal Government policies, the Federal Government says its "tough on drugs policy" is working and it stands by strategies of policing and interdiction, saying that they've been highly successful in relation to, in particular, cannabis and heroin.

DAVID CALDICOTT: Well, you have to ask the question of course, whether or not the reduction in heroin use in Australia is in fact to do with policing or whether it's in fact to do with the reduction in supply in Australia.

If there was such a tremendous success in policing the heroin problem, why aren't we seeing similar decreases in, say, for example, the ecstasy problem.

We aren't, in fact we see the steady march of ecstasy in consumption, all around Australia.

ANNIE GUEST: In your role as an emergency and trauma doctor, you see a lot of drug-related problems.

DAVID CALDICOTT: Absolutely.

ANNIE GUEST: Have you seen direct evidence of these policies not working?

DAVID CALDICOTT: Well, unfortunately, it is an ever-mounting mire of young adolescents who continue to experiment with drugs. Because really, they are now ignoring the messages of "Don't use drugs".

We asked young people at raves who they trust for their information on drugs, and in South Australia they trust the police more than they trust both the State and Federal Governments for their information on drugs, and that's a catastrophe.

ANNIE GUEST: The Federal Government says it goes beyond policing as well and puts substantial amounts of money into education campaigns.

DAVID CALDICOTT: Unfortunately, these education campaigns are abstinence-based. We have to accept the fact that 38 per cent, according to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare survey in 2005, 38 per cent of young Australians have tried an illegal substance.

If you are a drug user, and this is the opinion that would be espoused by many of the more right-wing politicians, then you deserve all the harm that's coming your way.

ANNIE GUEST: And what are those answers then?

DAVID CALDICOTT: Well, I think we can be quite clever in Australia and think outside the box. For example, let's support our needle injection rooms, which work so well, let's target drugs which we know to be very dangerous.

For example, hydroponic marijuana is more dangerous than bush-grown marijuana. We're a large ... very big supporters of school-based education, non-moral education, and I think there's more than enough evidence from a health perspective to persuade young people not to use drugs.

We have tried, ad nauseam, to introduce and trial a pill-testing program in Australia, and yet we've been repeatedly rebuffed and told that that sends the wrong message to consumers.

MARK COLVIN: Royal Adelaide Hospital emergency doctor, David Caldicott, speaking to Annie Guest.

Transcript from ABC PM radio program

MP3 of interview here. Check above ABC link for Win media and podcast links.
 
That's fantastic! Thanks to all those involved in the harm minimization efforts, it seems alot of progress is being made in the face of a 'war on drugs' style federal government.
 
Good stuff Dr C :)

Great to see a politician taking up Kanck's offer too!
 
Yeah, go for it Australia, show 'em who's boss!

If there's anything we can do from over the Tasman, let us know.
 
Well, that certainly warmed the cockles of my heart today :) Looking forward to seeing how it progresses!
 
Great news, look forward to seeing these guys in many future news articles setting the record straight. :)
 
Top