• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: swilow | Vagabond696

NEWS: The AGE - 14/03/08 'Police 'hit list' drawn up to catch drug-using officers'

lil angel15

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
7,828
Police 'hit list' drawn up to catch drug-using officers
Dan Oakes
March 14, 2008

SENIOR police have drawn up a hit list of officers to be drug-tested as soon as a new law is passed.

The law, expected to be passed in June, will allow Victoria Police to test employees if they have been involved in a "critical incident", such as a shooting or high-speed chase resulting in an injury, or if there is a reasonable suspicion that they have been abusing drugs.

The Assistant Commissioner of the Ethical Standards Department, Luke Cornelius, told The Age there had been an increase in the detection of police dealing and using drugs in the past 18 months. He said it was not clear whether this was due to more police abusing drugs or the result of better intelligence.

"(The Ethical Standards Department) does have a hit list. There are a number of people who will be tested, based on the credible intelligence that we currently have, as soon as we're able to," Mr Cornelius said.

"If they're found wanting, we will deal with them. Of course, if they come out with a clean bill of health, I can close the file."

Mr Cornelius would not disclose how many police were on the hit list, only saying that the list was of "sufficient size" to convince the force there was a need for targeted testing.

He said his experience with the Australian Federal Police, which tests for drugs, led him to believe that police who abused drugs would leave the force before testing was implemented.

Although the legislation gives Victoria Police the right to introduce random testing, Chief Commissioner Christine Nixon ruled that out when the law was announced in November.

Mr Cornelius described random testing as ineffective and expensive. He said in other jurisdictions it had returned positive results in fewer than 1% of cases.

"Even in an organisation where they have random testing, your chances of not being detected are still quite good, because you know you're only going to be tested every two or three years," he said.

"If we … see that there is a problem that we can't get at as a result of pursuing an intelligence-led strategy or automatically testing following a critical incident, that would be the time to consider (random testing)."

Mr Cornelius said the new testing regime would not only catch police who abused drugs but also protect officers following critical incidents.

"At coronial inquests, for example, (it may be) alleged that a member has taken drugs or had a drink, without any evidence to support that."

Under the new system, police who seek assistance will be offered an amnesty and receive treatment. Those caught through urine tests will face a professional standards assessment panel, which can recommend treatment, criminal charges and/or disciplinary action, including dismissal.

The AGE
 
Christine Nixon wants power to sack bent cops
Peter Mickelburough
March 15, 2008 12:00am

CHIEF Commissioner Christine Nixon wants greater powers to sack corrupt cops. The force's standing committee on ethical health has been directed to look at how to bring about the change.

"What we are exploring is how we might put the Chief Commissioner in a position where she can, like any other agency head within the public sector, determine the suitability of people for remaining in the police force," Assistant Commissioner (ethical standards) Luke Cornelius said yesterday.

A similar move by former chief commissioner Neil Comrie a decade ago drove a wedge between the Police Association and force command, and was abandoned.

The union yesterday said it would strenuously oppose any move to give Ms Nixon power to summarily sack staff.

Under existing law, Ms Nixon must give officers she lacks confidence in an opportunity to prove why they should not be sacked, and they can appeal to the Police Appeals Board.

Unlike other public servants who can be summarily dismissed, police are not covered by unfair dismissal laws.

Association legal manager Greg Davies said the union believed Ms Nixon wanted to further restrict members' rights to appeal if sacked.

"It's a massive grab for power, the like of which has never been witnessed in Victoria," he said.

Mr Cornelius said removing corrupt cops would be a focus in a review of the disciplinary system recommended by the Office of Police Integrity.

And he said a new drug-testing regime was a welfare-based program. He said there was a hit list of officers for when the new laws were enacted, probably in June.

Officers involved in critical incidents, such as shootings and high-speed chases, or who are suspected drug users, will soon be subject to compulsory drug tests.

Mr Cornelius said those on the list were believed to use illegal drugs off duty at rave parties or nightclubs.

"We're saying to people 'This is coming. If you are using illegal drugs, start thinking now about what you're going to do about it'," he said.

"We want to help members to be both free of drugs and sober when they go about performing their duties."

Those who test positive will face a professional standards panel that can recommend treatment, discipline or criminal charges.

Herald sun
 
Police or not, this is just another indication of everyones rights slowly being chipped away. :(
 
I dunno, with most work places, i think random drug testing is bs, but in the police, i think its pretty fair, this is a job where id really rather them not be on anything/be hung over from anything if they do get into a car chase/shooting etc. Hate to see how a cop drives on suicide tuesday =\
 
Top