It boils down to one thing, really. Are you trying to get clean from opiates? Or are you trying to not be compelled to do kratom and alcohol? Because suboxone withdrawal is FAR worse than kratom withdrawal. If you're trying to get off, being prescribed sub for kratom addiction is like being prescribed heroin for hydrocodone addiction. For me, sub is WAY better of an opiate than kratom, once you're past the initial stages where you get great effects from kratom (I find kratom becomes hard to get a good high from after abusing it for a while). It's going to be SO much easier to get off kratom.
That said, if you're just trying to get off the cycle of abusing short-acting drugs, and don't care about being on a different opiate indefinitely, sub could provide you a lot of stability in preventing you from wanting to do opiates (and possibly drink too). However, I really can't help but feel like it's a terrible idea. And if you want to get off completely, then it's definitely a terrible idea.
This is how I feel now. I told my doctor that i believe suboxone to be a stronger drug than kratom and not a step in the right direction, but she does not believe me and says she has already treated many kratom addicts with suboxone, which i think sounds insane. She says she'd give me a subolocade with IM naltrexone so it would not be possible for me to abuse the suboxone, but i still think it's nuts.
What i want is only to initially first get over my physical dependence to kratom, and also dexadrine, and start with at least a full month of no kratom, alcohol, dexadrine or other drugs. Then i'd probably try for a 2nd month, hopefully a 3rd, and try to go as long as i can without everything, but NOT with the intention of never using kratom, alcohol or anything i want EVER AGAIN in my life. i cannot imagine that, but at the same time, moderation is not possible for me, unless chemically induced, which is why i'm interested in naltrexone, but much more so ultra low dose than full dose, which she won't give me out of fear i'll mix it with kratom, as if that is somehow more dangerous than my being on suboxone. i know she's a doctor and i'm not, but i'm not unintelligent and i don't see this as the way to go.
My thing is that i feel out of control right now so i am dead set on being completely sober from everything for, like i said, a series of months. I can't imagine a whole year, but i'd go as long as i could and then i'd see how i feel. i don't want to ever go back to drinking as much as i am or even using as much kratom or dex as i do, despite kraotm being safe, i still feel it and all these drugs and drinking all negatively effect my quality of life, even if somehow they didn't effect my health so badly, which the drinking most definitely does.
So i want to use a drug, mainly naltrexone, to be able to chemically induce abstainance so i can be drug free as long as i want, and then if i want to use again then i can, and ideally i would like help with my cravings and depression, because i have depression anyone, and it gets worse when in any kind of wd, but my doctor isn't so sure that naltrexone will work for the cravings, which is why she is suggesting suboxone cause it will. But OF COURSE suboxone will help with the cravings, cause it's a freakin opiate, partial agonist or not.
And is it in fact true that kratom is also a partial agonist like suboxone?
That's why i am more interested in ultra low dose naltrexone, because some studies say that you can use and still get effects off kratom at the same time, and not only that, but have it POTENTIATE IT, but at the same time, have it lower your kratom tolerance down to like 2 grams, lessen side effects, and essentially make the kratom wd almost none existent so you can stop kratom if you want, but also reduce cravings to kratom and alcohol and work as a mood booster.
However, ULDN is not as well studied as full dose naltrexone and so my doctor won't prescribe and some of this information MIGHT NOT be true, and most of all, she sees it as an addict wanting to just use a potentiator to take kratom more safely, but that's NOT really how it is, i would STILL want to go without drinking and kratom and everything for AT LEAST a few months before id even consider trying to mix ULDN with kratom and see how it went, and being into harm reduction and not the ''you need to be drug free model'', i see no reason why ultra low dose naltrexone with kratom should be considered a horrible choice.
MY DOCTOR EVEN ADMITTED SHE COULD NOT SEE HOW ULTRA LOW DOSE NALTEXONE, EVEN MIXED WITH KRATOM AND/OR ALCOHOL WOULD BE DANGEROUS, THAT IT MIGHT BLOCK THEM OR MIGHT NOT, BUT STILL WOULDN'T BE DANGEROUS, BUT SHE REFUSED TO PRESCRIBE IT BECAUSE SHE THINKS I'LL JUST BE ''ABUSING IT''.
I just think that that's being a drug nazi, especially when considering she'll give me a drug that is so much stronger than ultra low dose naltrexone in suboxone, but that's the way these doctors are, and she's nicer than most, but still, i think she's wrong.
I just like the idea that with naltrexone of any kind i can have control over whether or not i abstain or moderate with drinking or kratom, and then stop if i want to use again. i want to be sober for a while, and then decide after that if i still want to be sober, but i know i need a lengthy period of sobriety and don't believe i can do it without a drug blocker of some kind, and so that's why i am seeing her. I went to her entirely to get ultra low dose naltrexone, but i had a feeling that she would refuse and only prescribe regular dose, and i was right.
Let me ask you a question though;
do you think the idea of taking regular dose naltrexone, then going off it if i wanted to get effects from drinking or taking kratom, then abstaining from the kratom long enough to go back to the naltrexone again, and playing with it in that way would be dangerous, and have you ever heard of anyone who's done it?
My doctor says she has had other addicts do this, and of course she sees that as abusing naltrexone, but i don't care.
I asked her if i were to want to get effects from kratom or drinking how long i'd have to stop taking the naltrexone, she said a few days. Then i asked if i am off the naltrexone and taking kratom again and getting effects from it, how long would i have to abstain from kratom to safely go back to naltrexone again to induce another period of abstainance, seeing as you can't start naltrexone while dependent on an opioid or you'll go into precipitated withdrawals, and she said i'd just have to be sure that i was not at all dependent on kratom.
So, i mean, it seems like the risk would be going back to naltrexone after getting off and using kratom, that i might still be dependent on the kratom and not aware of it and take naltrexone too soon and get precipitated kratom wd, and i don't know if that would be dangerous, as kratom wd is really not a lethal thing, but it would probably feel like a living hell.
I take klonopin though, which i hadn't realized before is what makes my kratom wd and possible mild alcohol wd much less.
So, lets say that i did stop taking naltrexone, took kratom again, and thought i was over the dependence and fucked up and took naltrexone and it put me into precipitated withdrawal, how dangerous would that be?
Would precipitated kratom withdrawal induced by naltrecxone be a really dangerous or lethal situation, or would it just feel like the worst possible kratom wd you could have coming on you all at once and take a while to get over, either tell the naltrexone wore off or the kratom was out of your system?
Is this idea of, admitedly, playing around with going back and forth between naltrexone induced abstainance to stopping to use a little kratom and drink a little, then time everything right and go back to naltrexone again, as i'm sure it is what i'm likely to eventually do, a really really dangerous idea, or would it mostly just be extremely uncomfortable but not super dangerous?
Again, this is why i want ultra low dose naltrexone and not full dose, cause supposedly it acts very differently and possibly helps more with cravings and depression than full dose but you still might be able to take kratom on it, but it might in fact make taking kratom safer with lower tolerance and side effects, IF in fact the info i read is true, which it might not be.
That way, i would not ever have to stop taking the ultra low dose naltrexone, STILL get lowered drug cravings, alcohol would still work but be less pleasurable so i would not want to drink as badly but i still COULD, i could use kratom but probably wouldn't want to that much, so it would be win/win, but no, she won't prescribe it.
She DID say that I could learn to make my own ultra low dose naltrexone from the pills but doesn't recommend it. I said ''yeah, but if i did that i wouldnt have a doctor to help me get the dose right'' and she said 'that's right'', as if to say ''and that's why you shouldn't do it''.....but that's fucked up cause the way i see is that if someone is going to do something anyone it should be a doctor's responsibility to use the information they have to help the patient use the drug or drug combo in the safest way possible. That's harm reduction after all.
But doctors don't see it that way. They see it as ''if I help you and there's side effects and the drug or drug combo is not approved, as ultra low dose naltrexone isn't yet, then i'm legally liable'', and ''if you are afraid of doing it cause you won't have a doctor's help then you might not do it.''
But then again, maybe i WILL use the combo anyway regardless of her advice, and it could be dangerous ONLY because i wouldn't use the combo correctly or get the dosage right, which maybe i WOULD be able to do with her help.
But again, doctors don't care what you want or if you want to get high more safely. They see ''getting high more safely'', or helping a patient do that, as enabling an addict and being legally liable. I say it's giving the person freedom to choose what they put in their body and helping them do what they are already going to do in the safest way possible and not judging them for it.
It's unavoidable that it will always be addicts vs addiction doctors, even though they say they want to help us, their help begins and ends with whatever they think is safest both for the patient and makes them not legally liable should something go wrong.
They don't care about us having freedom to choose what we put in our bodies, and want us to choose between being a drug user who is unhealthy or a sober person who is healthy.
They can't imagine helping a drug user to continue using, or at least having the option, while DOING IT MORE SAFELY...no, that is not an option that is allowed.
So let me know what you think.
I already told her that i don't think i want suboxone but i still want it on the table. I told her i want all options available, from the naltrexone pills to naltrecxone IM shot to suboxone pills and sublocade shot.
But, she wants me to get the naltrexone IM shot as she says it is what helps me get the dosage best over the pills and, here's the kicker
she doesn't want me to be able to have the choice to stop taking the naltrexone pills if i want to drink or use kratom, which i can't do if i get the shot.
But I said i want to start with the pills and see if the work and only get the shot if i decide to so that way if i want to stop taking the pills i can, and that sure, i want them to call suboxone in to the pharamcy and i can pick it up if i want, but i am pretty dead set on not taking it. I just think it's good to have the option, but i think its a very bad idea like you do and doubt ill do it.
I hope she doesn't get even MORE strict and tell me she won't even give me the naltrexone pills cause she thinks i might stop taking them and will only let me get the shot.
If she does that then i will probably take the shot the first time, which lasts a month, but if after that she won't prescribe the naltrexone pills i will probably try to find a new doctor who will, almost definitely i would sooner or later as i dont' want my choice to drink or take kratom determined for the rest of my life, i only want to have the option TO CHOOSE TO TAKE A MEDICATION WHICH WILL FORCE ME TO BE SOBER.
I mean, when you are in this position of liking drugs, but knowing you need to stop for a while and can't moderate and can't abstain without help, then doesn't the option of a pill that induces chemical abstainance seem like a great option to have?
I think it sounds great that if i want to be sober for any length of time i can take something that will make me be sober, but i only need to stop taking it for a few days if i want to use kratom or drink again, but i don't know how dangerous going back and forth will be if i do it, and again, i feel that IF in fact ULDN works the way some people think it might, that it's crazy i'm not allowed to take A MUCH LOWER DOSE OF A MEDICATION SHE'S ALREADY WILLING TO PRESCRIBE.
But, then again, you don't need a prescription to buy naltrexone, and i'm not sure you even need one to buy ultra low dose naltrecxone, but i'm afraid to use the dark web because i am the least computer literate person ever lol. But maybe i can buy ultra low dose naltrexone on the clear net and not even be at risk.
Do you know if you can buy ultra low dose naltrexone on the clear net legally, and do you think it would be hard to figure out how to make my own ultra low dose naltrexone from the full dose she gives me and get the dose right, consider i know NOTHING about chemistry?
Please let me know your thoughts, cause i think we are pretty like minded when it comes to this stuff.