Foreigner
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2009
- Messages
- 8,287
This might have been asked a million times before and I did UTFSE, but I didn't get the precise answer I was looking for.
I used to date a guy who was a former meth user, but was sober when we dated. He was 30 when we met and did meth around ages 21 and 22. Our relationship went very well for a time but ended up failing because he seemed to have an underdeveloped sense of emotional responsibility. He would do things in our relationship that were blatantly unethical, but would not be held accountable for them. He wasn't a psychopath, he had a great deal of human empathy, but it was like he was emotionally stunted somehow. He couldn't understand why certain things were hurting me, and it wasn't just a matter of differences in values. He really couldn't track his own actions properly. It felt like I was dating someone in their early 20's rather than a 30 year old.
A couple years later one of my clients, who was a former meth user as well, told me that he believed that meth emotionally stunted him at the age he did it, which in his case was age 17. He was now 32. I have to admit, it seemed like his understanding of his own emotional problems was... basic. He had a hard time integrating new information and the suggestions I gave him, as well as any nuances.
So, is it my imagination, or does meth really "lock" people into the emotional age that they do it at? Or am I misreading something? I have this belief that the brain is adaptable and can heal over time, albeit into new configurations, but is it possible for something like meth to cause permanent damage that can't be overcome?
Does this happen with other addictions as well? If so, which ones? Are psychdelics part of that too?
I'm open to hearing personal experiences as well as the science behind this, if anyone knows.
I used to date a guy who was a former meth user, but was sober when we dated. He was 30 when we met and did meth around ages 21 and 22. Our relationship went very well for a time but ended up failing because he seemed to have an underdeveloped sense of emotional responsibility. He would do things in our relationship that were blatantly unethical, but would not be held accountable for them. He wasn't a psychopath, he had a great deal of human empathy, but it was like he was emotionally stunted somehow. He couldn't understand why certain things were hurting me, and it wasn't just a matter of differences in values. He really couldn't track his own actions properly. It felt like I was dating someone in their early 20's rather than a 30 year old.
A couple years later one of my clients, who was a former meth user as well, told me that he believed that meth emotionally stunted him at the age he did it, which in his case was age 17. He was now 32. I have to admit, it seemed like his understanding of his own emotional problems was... basic. He had a hard time integrating new information and the suggestions I gave him, as well as any nuances.
So, is it my imagination, or does meth really "lock" people into the emotional age that they do it at? Or am I misreading something? I have this belief that the brain is adaptable and can heal over time, albeit into new configurations, but is it possible for something like meth to cause permanent damage that can't be overcome?
Does this happen with other addictions as well? If so, which ones? Are psychdelics part of that too?
I'm open to hearing personal experiences as well as the science behind this, if anyone knows.