Re-reading the post that phase_dancer referenced (which incidentally was written by me!) it appears that 3 pills that contained smack did not contain anything else. The article (which is mainly concenrned with methamphetamine) outlines the presence of identified substances in
a number of pills examined finishing with 17 pills which had neither amphetamine nor meth. 3 of those contained smack.
Points to note:
* It is no news that smack is smokable and may be well pressed into smokable pills in asia. It is unlikelly however to have smack in pills in Australia since people would assume they are meant for swallowing and as we all know smack is minimally if at all active if ingested orally.
* It remains unclear and unlikelly that smack has ever been added to crystal meth in Australia. However, the initial post of this thread and a logical consideration of why smack may be added has to be taken into account and not dismissed altogether.
a number of pills examined finishing with 17 pills which had neither amphetamine nor meth. 3 of those contained smack.
Points to note:
* It is no news that smack is smokable and may be well pressed into smokable pills in asia. It is unlikelly however to have smack in pills in Australia since people would assume they are meant for swallowing and as we all know smack is minimally if at all active if ingested orally.
* It remains unclear and unlikelly that smack has ever been added to crystal meth in Australia. However, the initial post of this thread and a logical consideration of why smack may be added has to be taken into account and not dismissed altogether.
