They cut it right where Barr states "But I think a fair history would say that it was a good decision because it upheld the rule of law. It helped, it upheld the standards of the Department of Justice, and it undid what was an injustice." and inserted their opinion "He didn’t make the case that he was upholding the rule of law." How can that direct contradiction NOT be deliberate? You think Todd and the NBC crew never saw the rest of the clip?if it was deliberate, it's deceitful behavior.
Wow you sure are willing to give extraordinarily charitable interpretations of intent to people whom you politically align with.as i said, it doesn't look good but i don't know why they did it because i don't have all the information and i prefer to not assume.
It's not just Trump who could learn a lot about double standards.president trump and his administration could learn from that. it would be great if we held both to the same standard.
Tucker Carlson said:"The following content has been identified by the YouTube community (whatever that is) as inappropriate or offensive to some audiences". By offensive they mean that the Left doesn't like it. And that is the new standard.
In review, the Ron Paul Institute reports news from a Libertarian perspective that frequently utilizes loaded emotional wording such as this: Incredible Disappearing Coronavirus – The Narrative Has Failed. Although they often rail against socialism they also frequently report negatively on Neo-Conservatives such as this: The Media Has Conveniently Forgotten George W. Bush’s Many Atrocities. This story is sourced to the factually Mixed Mises Institute.
Editorially, the Ron Paul Institute advocates for libertarian policy such as free-market capitalism, limited military intervention, marijuana legalization, return to the gold standard, and deregulation. When it comes to science they often deviate from the consensus regarding human-influenced climate change Can the Fed Save Us from Climate Change?. Further, they occasionally publish unsubstantiated conspiracy claims such as the Syria chemical attack being a false flag operation as well as promoting the Coronavirus as a hoax (See below). In general, the Ron Paul Institute reports news with a strong libertarian bias that is not always factual.
Failed Fact Checks
I really don't care for your biased and deceptive liberal fact-checkers.regarding the source of this article:
RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading...mediabiasfactcheck.com