This issue is always going to go round in circles.
The thing is, I can honestly see both sides of the argument, but in the end, I believe Australia should have apologized to the Aboriginals.
I say 'should have' because I personally believe that any apology now will be so loaded it isn't funny, and will look token and obligatory due to all the controversy surrounding it.
If Australia had done the right thing and apologized when all the issues about land rights and the stolen generation came to a head and swept the media, we would have come off looking a lot better, and would be a lot further on the road to reconciliation.
Keej, Schnouzer and anyone else against our government apologizing to the Aboriginals, these are my reasons why I think this.
1. Your defence that the past government's actions were simply those of a country trying to regain land etc in the normal course of action taken by a conquering civilisation doesn't wash well. I know these things were hardly regulated but IMO the settlers went "above and beyond" so to speak with the entire process. Whether this was common practice or otherwise, I think it is important to acknowledge that taking children off mothers, gratuitously harming a race
after you have already succeeded in taking their land, is an atrocity.
2. I think a lot of the differing viewpoints in this argument originate because of the variety of interpretations of the word 'sorry'. I can completely understand not wanting to be held responsible for the actions of people long past, not wanting to apologize on their behalf - but I just think that sometimes, you just have to suck it in and do it.
Sorry is the hardest word to say etc etc...all those cliches are there for a reason - noone likes admitting they were wrong. To me though, sorry is far from an admission of guilt, it's the first step towards reconciliation.
Ever been in a fight with a friend and for ages you remain stubborn, not apologizing because you don't want to admit you did anything wrong? As time passes, the value of not having your friend anymore becomes greater than losing some face, and you extend an apology - starting the road to forgiveness and reconciliation.
This is what I believe the apology to the Aboriginal community needs to be viewed as - a step into unifying the races that inhabit our nation. It shouldn't be viewed as a method of blame, for the very reasons that as people have pointed out, it's not something that our generation took part in or even would condone. It's a symbolic gesture (as UAN said) from our race to theirs.
I just feel if it were to come now, it will have lost a lot of its value as it will just seem like we were pressured into doing it.
Also I feel if this apology was extended more voluntarily some time ago, the entire land rights process would have been a lot less difficult, and the Aboriginals may have been more cooperative (before I get screamed at, I'm thinking of cases I've heard where there has been developments that have got past all levels of approval then at the last minute, construction has been abandoned because of a new claim that it is a spiritual ground --- that is unacceptable behaviour IMO).
I think it's amazing what a little compassion and ability to accept responsibility for "our" actions (ie. the actions of those before us) can achieve. But now we will never really know.