• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: swilow | Vagabond696

Drugs in the Federal Budget

Flexistentialist

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Jun 24, 2002
Messages
1,742
Just got this press release from Christopher Pyne's office.

10 May 2005
CP023/05

Reducing the harm which illicit drugs cause to the community is a priority for the Howard Government. In the past nine years, the Government has provided more than $1 billion in funding for its Tough on Drugs strategy, resulting in less people using illicit drugs and more drugs being seized.

The 2005-06 Budget provides $21.8 million in new funding for programs to help young people say "no" to illegal drugs and to provide more treatment and rehabilitation to drug users.

The new funding for 2005-06 comprises:

  • * $0.85 million for the National Illicit Drugs Campaign;
    * $12.0 million for the Non-Government Organisation Treatment Grants Program over two years from 2006-07;
    * $8.0 million for Capacity Building in Indigenous Communities to address problems with alcohol and drug abuse; and
    * $1.0 million for the Australian National Council on Drugs over three years.
An additional $850,000 will be provided in 2005-06 to extend the National Illicit Drugs Campaign. Prevention initiatives such as this play a key role in educating young people about the risks and negative consequences of illicit drug use.

The campaign includes national advertising, public relations activities, booklets, a web site and a telephone information line.

The additional funding for the Non-Government Organisation Treatment Grants Program is to ensure existing treatment services can continue to operate after the current contracts end in June 2006. Around 170 services across Australia are presently funded. Since the program began in 1997, more than $124 million has been provided in funding.

An additional $8 million will be provided to help Indigenous communities reduce the incidence of drug and alcohol abuse among their people. This funding will be allocated, in consultation with the Australian National Council on Drugs and the Ministerial Taskforce on Indigenous Affairs, to ensure it is directed to effective and appropriate activities.

The Government will increase its support for Of Substance magazine, to make it more accessible for health professionals. People working in the alcohol, tobacco and other drugs sector will no longer have to pay a $50 subscription to receive the magazine, which provides the latest information on drug research and best practice. The cost of this measure will be absorbed within the Health and Ageing portfolio.

The Australian National Council on Drugs is the key independent body advising the government on drug issues and comprises experts from voluntary and community organisations, law enforcement, and the health and social welfare areas.

The extra $1 million in funding, over the coming three financial years, recognises the increased costs associated with its responsibilities, which are to enhance the partnership between government and the community. The Council has pivotal advisory, advocacy and representative functions, with a significant role to provide government Ministers with independent, expert advice on matters related to licit and illicit drugs.


And this from the Australian National Council on Drugs:

MEDIA RELEASE

Federal Budget Announcement Very Welcome but 'More to Do Yet'

In response to the 2005-06 Federal Budget, Commissioner Mick Keelty, Professor Margaret Hamilton & Mr Garth Popple, Co Deputy Chairs of the Australian National Council on Drugs (ANCD) have stated "We are very pleased that new funding has been announced tonight for illicit and licit drug initiatives. In particular it is pleasing to see additional funds going to assist Indigenous communities and non-government organisations providing treatment. The focus on youth smoking is also very welcome."

The 2005-06 Federal Budget revealed the following additional funds:

  • Extension of the 'Comgas' Scheme to reduce petrol sniffing - $9.6 million over 4 years

    Increasing capacity for Indigenous communities to address substance use - $8.0 million over 4 years

    * A National Youth Anti-Smoking Campaign - $25.0 million over 4 years

    * Reducing smoking during pregnancy - $4.3 million over 3 years

    * Additional Funding for ANCD - $1.0 million over 3 years

    * Additional NGO Treatment Grants - $12.0 million over 2 years

    * Extension of the National Illicit Drug Campaign - $0.85 million over 1 year
The ANCD also noted the following announcements:

  • * Youth Mental Health Initiative (inc. co-morbidity issues) - $69.0 million over 4 years

    * Termination of the Retractable Needle & Syringe Program - Saving $51.1 million over 4 years
Whilst the ANCD expressed its support for the announcements, particularly the very appropriate termination of the retractable needle and syringe program - which has been fraught with problems - it did note that some areas of need, particularly in relation to addressing alcohol problems, HIV and hepatitis C transmission amongst injecting drug users and Asia-Pacific Regional drug use issues still required further attention.

In summing up the ANCD view Mr Gino Vumbaca, ANCD Executive Officer said that - "It is very pleasing to see the continuance of this Government's commitment to funding new drug and alcohol initiatives. Of course, as we know, the ANCD members also have a very strong commitment to ensuring that the gains made in recent times, such as reduced drug use and reduced crime, are maintained - and this requires both ongoing funding for existing programs, as well as targeted funding for potential problems.

I am sure the ANCD with its enhanced role under this Budget will be vigilant and astute in its advice to government on continuing to address the multitude of needs in communities caused by illicit and licit drug use. Indeed ANCD members are already looking forward to meeting with the Prime Minister, the Treasurer and other Ministers to discuss how best to address these needs in the 2006 Federal Budget."
 
Too bad Harm Reduction will never get a good run under the Howard government. It will be interesting to hear Pyne speak about this at the Insight forum. Thanks for posting it Flexistentialist.
 
the problem with just saying no is that you have to watch all your friends that said yes have a fucking awesome time - makes it a bit harder to say no the next time.

"Prevention initiatives such as this play a key role in educating young people about the risks and negative consequences of illicit drug use."

Maybe they should also educate the kids about the positive "consequences" of drug use? Give them the full picture instead of leaving them curious about all the little details that have been left out.
But it'll never happen.
 
Does anyone have any information on why they have "terminated the retractable needle and syringe program?" I was under the impression that the needle exchange programs had reduced the amount of contaminated injecting paraphenalia left in public toilets/parks etc.... Was i totally misled there? or are they gonna set up more safe injecting rooms instead to combat the shit left around?
 
The retractables were pulled because the technology wasn't good enough and the whole basis for their introduction was shakey.

Needle and Syringe Programs aren't effected by this in any way.
 
still no harm reduction funding, not even a harm reduction trial... i love this goverment!!!

we should all start needle drugs.. the goverment does anything for them..
 
Benno23 said:
Maybe they should also educate the kids about the positive "consequences" of drug use? Give them the full picture instead of leaving them curious about all the little details that have been left out.
But it'll never happen.

If any government funded agency started telling kids the truth about the odds of overdosing on mdma or lsd, they wouldnt be government funded for long.

deathsper100k.gif
 
^^ That's not true. I know of many government funded agencies that highlight the comparative death rates between the various legal and illegal drugs.

While the government is conservative with regards to illicit drug use, the various alcohol and other drug professionals (eg social workers, pscyhologists, educators, researchers etc) are almost universally supportive of harm reduction.
 
Top