• Select Your Topic Then Scroll Down
    Alcohol Bupe Benzos
    Cocaine Heroin Opioids
    RCs Stimulants Misc
    Harm Reduction All Topics Gabapentinoids
    Tired of your habit? Struggling to cope?
    Want to regain control or get sober?
    Visit our Recovery Support Forums

Opioids Do you think its possible (in the future) for a drug to completely stop WD's from opiates?

If we legalize all substances then we would have a better chance. But even if withdrawal would be avoidable that is not hardest part of stopping opioids. We should have more interest why addiction develops. My opinion is that it stems from early environment that was lacking in some way so genes were expressed accordingly. I firmly believe that addiction can be solved only on a social level with people living in world where they feel connected and cared for. Genes do play a roll but my hunch is that environment is more important because it can make genes dormant or expressed. But I am not expert on that field so it is only my uneducated guess.

But to get to your original question, I think it is probable if all can be researched and applied.

Peace!
Soma

Edit due to spell correct and additional info.

I feel like opiates are one of the stronger addictions because even people with no history of addiction can become hooked hardcore on them. This happens too with other drugs, but it seems like more so with opioids/opiates for whatever reasons.

Once the feeling is programmed into the brain it's like your brain itself is constantly demanding it--not the user. Other drugs in general seem to have more of a mental craving for the substance like stimulants for example. The cravings for opies seem physical, like nicotine. Once the feeling has grown on someone the cravings really last your entire life whether you're in denial or not. I'm getting off topic but it seems like opies are just incredibly powerful and have the highest relapse rate as if the feeling overrides logic.. Of course other addictions can be more dangerous and just as addicting, but I've always felt like opiates are in a class of their own in terms of their addictive quality. You don't have to be an addict to experience opiate addiction--it can easily turn you into one and that's the scariest part. When people think of addicts, they think of someone who has struggled with depression and anxiety long before the substance abuse came in. I believe that any normal person and "happy" person can become an opiate addict, whereas for other substances this viewpoint on addicts is probably true. I don't know... has anyone considered their life to be really great and felt happy and still ended up hooked on oxy/H?

Back on topic, isn't it just how the brain's endorphin system works? In theory it's impossible for the brain to receive external endorphins and not react as a consequence. They may get better withdrawal tools than suboxone though in time... hopefully it will help addicts not relapse during the withdrawal period which is so commonly done.
 
Last edited:
I don't think a drug 100 percent COMPLETELY eliminating ALL WD symptoms from cold turkying from serious high dose opiates sounds realistic, but I would guess there could be drugs that could get rid of a lot of it.

On that note, does anyone know more about Ultra Low Dose Naltrexone and want to respond to my thread on it and my questions?

Either no one knows the answers or no one wants to answer lol.

But I have been reading some reports on how Ultra Low Dose Naltrexone works VERY differently from high normal dose which blocks opioids effects and will put you into precipitated WD, and according to a number of studies and people IF DONE PROPERLY YOU CAN ACTUALLY TAKE ULTRA LOW DOSE NALTREXONE WITH AN OPIOID AND HAVE IT GREATLY REDUCE YOUR DEPENDENCE AND TOLERANCE AND SIDE EFFECTS OF THE OPIATE!!

There seems to be a lot of confusion about it, but I read that IT IS ACTUALLY TRUE THAT IN 2009 THERE WAS AN FDA APPROVED MEDICATION THAT WAS A COMBO OF ULTRA LOW DOSE NALTREXONE AND AN OPIATE, I THINK HYDROCODONE OR OXYCODONE.

SUPPOSEDLY at least in SOME CASES people were able to take ULDN with their opiate and have it MASSIVELY lower their opiate tolerance and the amount needed for pain and eliminate a LARGE percentage of their withdrawals upon stopping their opiate, and that is why the med was created; because pain patients needed to lower their tolerance for their meds to work.

The study I have cited below is something I quickly read where they talk about how the combo of ULDN and opiates was being used effectively for a while, but then there were some incidents of it going badly with people going into precipitated WDs, but then according to the patient in the study he confirms that so long as you are NOT INITIALLY DEPENDENT ON YOUR OPIATE when starting the ULDN, that you can avoid those problems.

He seems to be saying that you have to FIRST make sure you are not dependent highly on your opiate before using ULDN and/or that the problems occur if you use too high a dose of naltrexone, but that if you aren't dependent physically on your opiate when you start using ULDN and keep the dose of Nal. low enough you can, in his experience, continue to use both without issues.

THIS GUY SAID HE COMPLETELY QUIT MORPHINE WITHOUT ANY WITHDRAWALS from taking ULDN with it!!

But it seems to be a situation that is confusing because people might not get their Naltrexone does right because if you take HIGH dose naltexone within ANY time frame of being dependent on ANY opiate/opioid then you will IMMEDIATELY be thrown into HELLISH withdrawals, but that's cause they either used too high a dose of Naltrexone or didn't get the timing right.

There appears to be a difference of night and day between using high dose, low dose and ultra low dose naltrexone.

I am personally interested in mixing it with kratom because several Reddit users have reported doing it and having it lower their Kratom tolerance back to the dose they used in their honeymoon phase-days and allowed them to have very few side effects and stop using Kratom if they wanted.

Also, it appears that there is some potential for ULDN to be used as an antidepressant because it increases endorphins, which is something that normal dose naltrexone CANNOT be used for as it just blocks the receptors.

I don't know, it sounds too good to be true, but even as someone who does not use hard opiates and only kratom, I want to try it, and I'm going to see a psychopharmacologist who is apparently very open minded and compassionate towards both addicts and people with mental health problems, so maybe she'll prescribe it for me.

If she does and i try it I'll let people know how it works.


 
Last edited:
↑ ↑ ↑

Maybe is not so off topic to say something about how dependence and addiction is created in the first place if we want to get closer to and answer "is it possible (in the future) for a drug to completely stop WD's from opiates?". I agree that anyone has propensity towards addiction. Everybody has inborn function to remember rewarding stimuli in order to have a greater chance to get it again. We use same parts (regions) of the brain for multiple purposes(example - we use same region of the brain for evaluating how disgusting some substance/food is, but also we use that region for moral judgments and how disgusting other peoples behavior is. See Dr. Robert Sapolsky for great lectures regarding this issue.). So what was once advantageous adaptation that helped us survive in food deprived environment now is a liability as we are living in a surplus environment. Some substances are pushing that reward button harder than other and those substances, in average, have greater likelihood to cause dependence and addiction as we imprint them into our memory more than others. But there is variety and different people react differently to same stimuli. It is very possible for someone to be more prone to gambling addiction (more related to adrenaline and dopamine) than opioid addiction (more related to endorphin and dopamine). This is oversimplification but you get the gist.

From what I read and understood, your particular configuration regarding what is rewarding is greatly influenced by specifics of your environment. Especially early environment. Environment shapes us (epigenetics) and makes us more susceptible to one form of relief than the other. Nobody is without some forms of pain and suffering, that is life, but my view (not just my obviously) is that those who suffer more will be more prone to addiction as they have repeated need to relieve heavy pain. This is obvious in the realm of the chronic pain management, but as the same area of the brain is involved in processing emotional pain as it is in processing physical pain, implications should be obvious. Now, there are ranges, types, levels, and so on, of everything. Formula is, oversimplified but obvious - "more severe/chronic suffering" + "more potent reliever of suffering" = "greater chance of addiction". Opioids are best pain relievers known to man so there is no mystery why addiction is most likely to develop with those kind of agents. But as you said, it is not exclusive to opioids, as similar cravings can be result of using other agents. You mentioned nicotine, but you can have life long craving due to cocaine, gambling, benzodiazepine, food or sex addiction/habit/dependence

Why is all this relevant for answering the question in the title? In my mind there is no agent that can erase addiction, as addiction is learned habit, repeated many many times. Dependence is one of major factors in addiction. It is not biggest but it is certainly tough to brake. Changing how we view addiction leads us to understand that environment is very important factor both when dependence is created but also when we want to brake dependence. I think that we should put much more emphasis to environment and its interaction with particular person when it comes to resolving withdrawal. Different environment with same pharmaceutical agents create different subjective and objective outcomes. Mere fact that having somebody beside who truly cares for you helps with subjective and objective severity of withdrawal, mirrors the need for a greater focus on the environment. I do not know will we ever be able to invent such a potent pharmaceutical agent that will "heal withdrawal" without the need for transformative, but never the less difficult, experiences (like the one ibogaine induces). My hunch is that this will not be something on the table in next 20 years. But, I think that we could get much more from already existing pharmaceutical agents if we start to view addiction from more real point of view. If we start to admit that our society is enabling addiction, with its consumerism that celebrates "the now appeal", while at the same time is very lacking in helping vulnerable parts of peoples psyche (socialism is a dirty word these days), then we could create models that would help somebody go through withdrawal pretty easily. First we should admit that environment plays a crucial role in addiction. Than we should start to value peoples addiction based on their individual factors, not ideology or pure theory. Than we should create "individual based detox model" for each individual, based on their true state (which includes factors like past experience, current psycho-social status, substances they use, possible future development). Finally, we should implement that model and modify it based on the response. Although even this looks like utopia in today society, and it does not relieve withdrawal completely, I think that this is the way to go. This way withdrawal could be minimal to, I believe, extent that process of detoxing would ceased to be an obstacle that people fear.

My final answer would be - It is possible, but not something that i expect to happen in next 20 years. But if we frame it differently than best chance to relieve pain of WD is to frame it in an highly individualized "environment + pharmaceutical agent(s)" treatment. That treatment would resolve great deal of emotional pain (less guilt, less anxiety, less depression, more acceptance, more empathy) and than drugs would work more efficiently in resolving withdrawal discomfort.

Sorry for the long post, it is very complicated issue.

Peace 🖖

Edit due to spell correction and few additional sentences that clarify my take on this extremely complex topic.

Good post (y) As a society we view addiction as a disease and illogical, but I think that addiction makes quite a bit of sense. Whatever substance is your demon, you're benefiting from the effects of the substance that in a way can improve your life noticeably so. For example, many alcoholics or benzo abusers struggle with anxiety. Your substance of choice literally bends life to become the way you want it and even in spite of the cons the pros still feel worth it. I don't know if it's possible to become addicted to something without the mental thrill and mental attachment to a substance. I despise cigarettes and alcohol, so even if I somehow became dependent on one of those in my opinion it would be easier to quit than a substance I was deeply mentally attached to.

Opiates and stimulants usually produce euphoria or release more dopamine than few things in the natural sober world can produce. It seems to make sense why many people would struggle with resisting the urge in that regard. I just feel like stating that addicts are "lacking" in some regard to begin with is a watered down and sugar-coated way of describing a highly intricate issue.
 
I don't think a drug 100 percent COMPLETELY eliminating ALL WD symptoms from cold turkying from serious high dose opiates sounds realistic, but I would guess there could be drugs that could get rid of a lot of it.

On that note, does anyone know more about Ultra Low Dose Naltrexone and want to respond to my thread on it and my questions?

Either no one knows the answers or no one wants to answer lol.

But I have been reading some reports on how Ultra Low Dose Naltrexone works VERY differently from high normal dose which blocks opioids effects and will put you into precipitated WD, and according to a number of studies and people IF DONE PROPERLY YOU CAN ACTUALLY TAKE ULTRA LOW DOSE NALTREXONE WITH AN OPIOID AND HAVE IT GREATLY REDUCE YOUR DEPENDENCE AND TOLERANCE AND SIDE EFFECTS OF THE OPIATE!!

There seems to be a lot of confusion about it, but I read that IT IS ACTUALLY TRUE THAT IN 2009 THERE WAS AN FDA APPROVED MEDICATION THAT WAS A COMBO OF ULTRA LOW DOSE NALTREXONE AND AN OPIATE, I THINK HYDROCODONE OR OXYCODONE.

SUPPOSEDLY at least in SOME CASES people were able to take ULDN with their opiate and have it MASSIVELY lower their opiate tolerance and the amount needed for pain and eliminate a LARGE percentage of their withdrawals upon stopping their opiate, and that is why the med was created; because pain patients needed to lower their tolerance for their meds to work.

The study I have cited below is something I quickly read where they talk about how the combo of ULDN and opiates was being used effectively for a while, but then there were some incidents of it going badly with people going into precipitated WDs, but then according to the patient in the study he confirms that so long as you are NOT INITIALLY DEPENDENT ON YOUR OPIATE when starting the ULDN, that you can avoid those problems.

He seems to be saying that you have to FIRST make sure you are not dependent highly on your opiate before using ULDN and/or that the problems occur if you use too high a dose of naltrexone, but that if you aren't dependent physically on your opiate when you start using ULDN and keep the dose of Nal. low enough you can, in his experience, continue to use both without issues.

THIS GUY SAID HE COMPLETELY QUIT MORPHINE WITHOUT ANY WITHDRAWALS from taking ULDN with it!!

But it seems to be a situation that is confusing because people might not get their Naltrexone does right because if you take HIGH dose naltexone within ANY time frame of being dependent on ANY opiate/opioid then you will IMMEDIATELY be thrown into HELLISH withdrawals, but that's cause they either used too high a dose of Naltrexone or didn't get the timing right.

There appears to be a difference of night and day between using high dose, low dose and ultra low dose naltrexone.

I am personally interested in mixing it with kratom because several Reddit users have reported doing it and having it lower their Kratom tolerance back to the dose they used in their honeymoon phase-days and allowed them to have very few side effects and stop using Kratom if they wanted.

Also, it appears that there is some potential for ULDN to be used as an antidepressant because it increases endorphins, which is something that normal dose naltrexone CANNOT be used for as it just blocks the receptors.

I don't know, it sounds too good to be true, but even as someone who does not use hard opiates and only kratom, I want to try it, and I'm going to see a psychopharmacologist who is apparently very open minded and compassionate towards both addicts and people with mental health problems, so maybe she'll prescribe it for me.

If she does and i try it I'll let people know how it works.



The latest book I read about low dose and ultra low dose naltrexone was almost 300 pages, it covered everything under the sun just about, and the theories in it definitely seemed to have something to them and it makes me wonder if when naltrexone is used in cases in alcoholism if less is more. Presumably in the context of narcotic habituation and addiction, naltrexone is used as a type of Antabuse type mechanism and therefore at higher doses, though I've got to wonder what that does to people who are not in the best cardiac and pulmonary health . . .

I would be willing to take nalorphine or its esters PO in low doses or in ultra low doses as a shot a couple of times a month to help the dextromethorphan slow, stop, or reverse the development of tolerance to morphine, hydromorphone &c but a doctor would have to do some convincing to have me take anything with naloxone or naltrexone in it. I am guessing that any of these antagonists should optimally be dosed in moles per square metre of body surface area and the idea here, like when people have reported success with ultra low dose naltrexone washing out some hydromorphone tolerance without having to modify the hydromorphone dose, is to have the antagonist clean off some μ, κ, and δ opioid receptors, and maybe get some endorphins running around too. There are levorphanol analogues of naloxone and naltrexone which could in theory also impact the opioid-like receptor, the NMDA and nociception systems, and σ receptors.

It makes one wonder if somehow the liver or another part of the body is somehow knocking the N-cyclopropylmethyl group off of position 17 on the naltrexone carbon skeleton and therefore there is some oxymorphone floating around for a short time.

The combination drug is called Oxytrex and from what I read and heard about it, the inventors seemed to take it on faith that there is such a thing as opioid-induced hyperalgesia that potentially affects 100 per cent of people on narcotics, whereas the evidence seems pretty thin to me and hearing it always brought up as a reason to taper people off medications they are taking, sort of a deus ex machina Mac Guffin non sequitur rabbit in a hat to whip out when they have nothing else, along with Vitamin D deficiency . . . What appears to really be the case is that some people have a combination of metabolism, hormone levels, other endocrine conditions and perhaps inherited differences in the nervous system which causes something like that to happen, and it could very well happen with other kinds of drugs too. The fact that people mention opioid induced hyperalgesia in propaganda which also often denies there is such a thing a pseudo-addiction, where people with pain not being treated properly work very hard to get it treated properly, should raise suspicion too.
 
The latest book I read about low dose and ultra low dose naltrexone was almost 300 pages, it covered everything under the sun just about, and the theories in it definitely seemed to have something to them and it makes me wonder if when naltrexone is used in cases in alcoholism if less is more. Presumably in the context of narcotic habituation and addiction, naltrexone is used as a type of Antabuse type mechanism and therefore at higher doses, though I've got to wonder what that does to people who are not in the best cardiac and pulmonary health . . .

I would be willing to take nalorphine or its esters PO in low doses or in ultra low doses as a shot a couple of times a month to help the dextromethorphan slow, stop, or reverse the development of tolerance to morphine, hydromorphone &c but a doctor would have to do some convincing to have me take anything with naloxone or naltrexone in it. I am guessing that any of these antagonists should optimally be dosed in moles per square metre of body surface area and the idea here, like when people have reported success with ultra low dose naltrexone washing out some hydromorphone tolerance without having to modify the hydromorphone dose, is to have the antagonist clean off some μ, κ, and δ opioid receptors, and maybe get some endorphins running around too. There are levorphanol analogues of naloxone and naltrexone which could in theory also impact the opioid-like receptor, the NMDA and nociception systems, and σ receptors.

It makes one wonder if somehow the liver or another part of the body is somehow knocking the N-cyclopropylmethyl group off of position 17 on the naltrexone carbon skeleton and therefore there is some oxymorphone floating around for a short time.

The combination drug is called Oxytrex and from what I read and heard about it, the inventors seemed to take it on faith that there is such a thing as opioid-induced hyperalgesia that potentially affects 100 per cent of people on narcotics, whereas the evidence seems pretty thin to me and hearing it always brought up as a reason to taper people off medications they are taking, sort of a deus ex machina Mac Guffin non sequitur rabbit in a hat to whip out when they have nothing else, along with Vitamin D deficiency . . . What appears to really be the case is that some people have a combination of metabolism, hormone levels, other endocrine conditions and perhaps inherited differences in the nervous system which causes something like that to happen, and it could very well happen with other kinds of drugs too. The fact that people mention opioid induced hyperalgesia in propaganda which also often denies there is such a thing a pseudo-addiction, where people with pain not being treated properly work very hard to get it treated properly, should raise suspicion too.

Hey man, so since you read a book about Naltrexone and seem to understand some things about it I'd like to ask you some questions, but if you could refrain from using biochemical and scientific terms and explanations I'd appreciate it because I am bad with science and don't understand that kind of stuff. Like, you started talking about ''opioid-induced hyperalgesia'', but what exactly is that?

And when you wrote this 'the evidence seems pretty thin to me and hearing it always brought up as a reason to taper people off medications they are taking, sort of a deus ex machina Mac Guffin non sequitur rabbit in a hat...''

and this ''the fact that people mention opioid induced hyperalgesia in propaganda which also often denies there is such a thing a pseudo-addiction, where people with pain not being treated properly work very hard to get it treated properly, should raise suspicion too''....are you trying to say that you don't think that ultra low dose naltrexone can be used in combination with opioids to reduce tolerance and side effects and/or that you don't think ULDN can be taken safely alongside opioids''?

You have pretty good linguistic skills with your ''deus ex machina'' and ''non sequitur rabbit in a hat'' phrases LOL, but you just totally lost me...

My situation is that I am seeing a drug counselor and will also see a psycho-pharmacologist soon, and while Kratom is not a super bad drug to be dependent on, it has both helped me and hindered me in some ways, and that, along with some physical and psychological dependence on dexadrine and definitely being an alcoholic, are things I need some help with.

So I am interested in BOTH regular high dose Naltrexone to simply block me from using both Kratom and alcohol entirely for a while so i can just experience true sobriety for the first time in a long time and get myself clean, but then after that I am not 100 percent willing to commit to NEVER using Kratom or alcohol again, and both because I have heard cases of ULDN working as an antidressant and I have depression, and because I have heard reports that it CAN BE TAKEN WITH KRATOM safely to reduce tolerance and side effects and possibly even negate or even almost entirely eliminate withdrawal symptoms, makes me interested in that as well.

So my questions about ULDN as opposed to regular naltrexone are:

1) Do you think that these stories I've heard of people being able to take Kratom WITH ULDN (and in the study I read a guy actually used it with Morphine and was still able to safely ingest them simultaneously) have any merit to them, and do you think it would be possible for someone to take Kratom and ULDN at the same time without the ULDN putting them into precipitated withdrawal and actually lower tolerance, side effects and withdrawal effects like I have heard, or do you think that it wouldn't be possible since that's not how high dose naltrexone works?

2) If it were possible to do what I mentioned above, do you think you'd have to make sure to break your physical dependence to Kratom before trying it?

3) Do you know if ULDN completely blocks alcohol from getting you drunk or buzzed like high dose naltrexone does, or can one drink safely on ULDN?

4) If it is NOT safe or possible to take Kratom and ULDN simultaneously, but one were taking ULDN regularly and then stopped and started using Kratom again, how long do you think they'd have to then abstain from Kratom before safely going back to ULDN again?

5) Likewise, if using REGULAR naltrexone at higher doses, how long does one need to abstain from Kratom do you think before they can safely taken Naltrexone and then how long would they have to abstain from Naltrexone before they could again take Kratom without it blocking its' effects?

I've heard that for TYPICAL opioids like hydrocodone or heroin that one needs to abstain for at least 7-10 days before it is safe to take REGULAR naltrexone again, but I don't know if that also goes for Kratom, and I know that with alcohol one can just skip the Naltrexone the night before and drink again and get effects from it, but I don't know if it works the same way with Kratom, where you can just skip a dose and then the Kratom will effect you again the next day.

6) Have you heard anything about ULDN being used as an antidepressant by raising endorphins, and do you believe that it can work that way?

7) And in general, do you think there's anything else I should know about either ULDN or regular dose Naltrexone before using them, particularly considering that I am someone who, while he certainly wants a long break from both Kratom and drinking, will eventually use both those substances again?


Sorry for asking you so many questions, but I am going to see this psychopharmacologist for the first time next week and we only briefly talked on the phone, but she said that while she was aware of what Kratom is and how it works and has experience with Naltrexone that she is unaware if Kratom can be safely combined with ULDN and said that she'd ask her colleagues about it but that she'd be concerned about whether or not it's safe, and this is a question I'll eventually want answered.

Thanks.
 
Hey man, so since you read a book about Naltrexone and seem to understand some things about it I'd like to ask you some questions, but if you could refrain from using biochemical and scientific terms and explanations I'd appreciate it because I am bad with science and don't understand that kind of stuff. Like, you started talking about ''opioid-induced hyperalgesia'', but what exactly is that?

We can divide hyperalgesia into two parts: hyper and algesia.

Hyper
is a greek root, (source for meaning of a word) whenever you see "hyper" at the beginning of a word that basically means more than or above. The opposite is "hypo" which means beneath, less or under. Think hypodernmic needle (goes under the skin (dermis))

Algesia refers to feeling the sensation of pain. So hyperalgesia is to increase sensitivity to pain. And opiod induced means it was "induced" or brought about by the use of opioids.
 
Admittedly I have not read the entire thread but I can say one thing with absolute certainty, someone will become quite rich if they can figure it out. My guess is that will probably involve some manner of uping dopamine and other synapses addiction works on. Who wants to become rich, ball's in your court!
 
Loperamide pretty much stops all physical withdrawal... you have to want to do just that though. You can dose high enough to stop withdrawal without issue (actually stop, not just reduce), but if you start trying to dose to break the pump that keeps it out of the brain because you want to be high instead of just not sick, there's dangerous cardiac side effects. It's technically an opioid as well, but tapering is so much easier when getting high isn't part of the equation.

The best bet for future development though would be looking at which alkaloid(s) of iboga stop withdrawal and how it works; get those benefits without the tripping. Of course it could turn out those mechanisms are too intertwined to separate. Major metabolite noribogaine exhibits ĸ-opioid receptor mixed agonism/antagonism but nothing at μ... could that be the trick?
 
I'm sure eventually I mean fuck we've landed on the moon n been to the bottom of the ocean it's possible to have aids and test negative anything is possible it's just weather or not they wanna take the time to discover it
 
Hey man, so since you read a book about Naltrexone and seem to understand some things about it I'd like to ask you some questions, but if you could refrain from using biochemical and scientific terms and explanations I'd appreciate it because I am bad with science and don't understand that kind of stuff. Like, you started talking about ''opioid-induced hyperalgesia'', but what exactly is that?

And when you wrote this 'the evidence seems pretty thin to me and hearing it always brought up as a reason to taper people off medications they are taking, sort of a deus ex machina Mac Guffin non sequitur rabbit in a hat...''

and this ''the fact that people mention opioid induced hyperalgesia in propaganda which also often denies there is such a thing a pseudo-addiction, where people with pain not being treated properly work very hard to get it treated properly, should raise suspicion too''....are you trying to say that you don't think that ultra low dose naltrexone can be used in combination with opioids to reduce tolerance and side effects and/or that you don't think ULDN can be taken safely alongside opioids''?

You have pretty good linguistic skills with your ''deus ex machina'' and ''non sequitur rabbit in a hat'' phrases LOL, but you just totally lost me...

My situation is that I am seeing a drug counselor and will also see a psycho-pharmacologist soon, and while Kratom is not a super bad drug to be dependent on, it has both helped me and hindered me in some ways, and that, along with some physical and psychological dependence on dexadrine and definitely being an alcoholic, are things I need some help with.

So I am interested in BOTH regular high dose Naltrexone to simply block me from using both Kratom and alcohol entirely for a while so i can just experience true sobriety for the first time in a long time and get myself clean, but then after that I am not 100 percent willing to commit to NEVER using Kratom or alcohol again, and both because I have heard cases of ULDN working as an antidressant and I have depression, and because I have heard reports that it CAN BE TAKEN WITH KRATOM safely to reduce tolerance and side effects and possibly even negate or even almost entirely eliminate withdrawal symptoms, makes me interested in that as well.

So my questions about ULDN as opposed to regular naltrexone are:

1) Do you think that these stories I've heard of people being able to take Kratom WITH ULDN (and in the study I read a guy actually used it with Morphine and was still able to safely ingest them simultaneously) have any merit to them, and do you think it would be possible for someone to take Kratom and ULDN at the same time without the ULDN putting them into precipitated withdrawal and actually lower tolerance, side effects and withdrawal effects like I have heard, or do you think that it wouldn't be possible since that's not how high dose naltrexone works?

2) If it were possible to do what I mentioned above, do you think you'd have to make sure to break your physical dependence to Kratom before trying it?

3) Do you know if ULDN completely blocks alcohol from getting you drunk or buzzed like high dose naltrexone does, or can one drink safely on ULDN?

4) If it is NOT safe or possible to take Kratom and ULDN simultaneously, but one were taking ULDN regularly and then stopped and started using Kratom again, how long do you think they'd have to then abstain from Kratom before safely going back to ULDN again?

5) Likewise, if using REGULAR naltrexone at higher doses, how long does one need to abstain from Kratom do you think before they can safely taken Naltrexone and then how long would they have to abstain from Naltrexone before they could again take Kratom without it blocking its' effects?

I've heard that for TYPICAL opioids like hydrocodone or heroin that one needs to abstain for at least 7-10 days before it is safe to take REGULAR naltrexone again, but I don't know if that also goes for Kratom, and I know that with alcohol one can just skip the Naltrexone the night before and drink again and get effects from it, but I don't know if it works the same way with Kratom, where you can just skip a dose and then the Kratom will effect you again the next day.

6) Have you heard anything about ULDN being used as an antidepressant by raising endorphins, and do you believe that it can work that way?

7) And in general, do you think there's anything else I should know about either ULDN or regular dose Naltrexone before using them, particularly considering that I am someone who, while he certainly wants a long break from both Kratom and drinking, will eventually use both those substances again?


Sorry for asking you so many questions, but I am going to see this psychopharmacologist for the first time next week and we only briefly talked on the phone, but she said that while she was aware of what Kratom is and how it works and has experience with Naltrexone that she is unaware if Kratom can be safely combined with ULDN and said that she'd ask her colleagues about it but that she'd be concerned about whether or not it's safe, and this is a question I'll eventually want answered.

Thanks.

1. People have been certainly able to do things such as that, with hydromorphone, smack, and morphine. The one hydromorphone case that comes to mind involved someone who took naltrexone two times a week on a dose I cannot remember exactly.

2. Given that people have used it as I mention in (1) would point to it being possible to also do so on kratom, though there is less knowledge about kratom so far as there is about morphine

3. The effect in the cases of alcoholism make me think that the theory that naltrexone prompts the body to make more endorphins has something to it. So I am inclined to conclude that there is not an actual literal alcohol blocking effect taking place. The two other drugs used for alcoholism are disulfram, which changes the metabolism of alcohol, and ketamine, which has an anaesthetic effect, so ketamine also does not literally block alcohol. The prn drugs for anxiety and insomnia in recovering alcoholics are clomethiazole, diazepam, and phenobarbitone, and at one point there were scientists proposing looking at methaqualone again for this purpose as well as sodium oxybate (Georgia Home Boy, Grievous Bodily Harm) - all of those impact the Gaba system but I don't think there is a literal blocking of alcohol in the CNS going on, there is dopamine reuptake inhibition or release, and various Gaba effects. Meprobamate, carisoprodol, and tripelennamine, to mention just three, can also help folks out at night.

As far a drinking on naltrexone, so many things are caused or prevented by metabolism of alcohol that it is not possible to say with certainty, also with oral dosing of naltrexone it will modify the Liberation, Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism & Elimination profile which could be good or not. Like the kind of dose dumping that got extended-release hydromorphone withdrawn from the market in the United States is one possibility, and getting more naltrexone than was intended is not the best idea.

4. Avoiding precipitated withdrawal is going to be on the order of days, up to a week it sounds like and . . .

5. The washout period for naltrexone in such a case could be 6-14 days depending on a number of things like other drugs being taken, individual metabolism, and narcotic use history

6. I know that naltrexone is being investigated for this purpose and I tend to think it is the endorphin effects . . . the buprenorphine-samidorphan mixture researched for anti-depressant efficacy probably works the same way.

7. Naltrexone will lower or more or less eliminate any opioid tolerance you may have, which is very important to keep in mind when going back to Kratom or narcotic analgesics.

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia is, according to the theory being batted around, that after some point opioids make people more sensitive to pain and may cause some sort of pain, especially in the muscles. I hear of a lot of people being told they may have it when they report that their dose of narcotics is not working like it used to -- so the patient may have better results with little or no narcotics. We all know about tolerance and it can be demonstrated, so tapering someone down or off narcotics -- how on God's Green Earth will that make a positive difference? Cases like that usually call for opioid rotation not cessation, such as replacing morphine with ketobemidone, piritramide, methadone, or another chemically dissimilar medication, and/or the introduction or changing of adjuncts and atypical analgesics like hydroxyzine, nefopam, and dozens of others. So opioid-induced hyperalgesia is a political tool for doctors who are being threatened by regulators or are just ignorant.

I have also heard the theory that chronic pain may be caused or exacerbated by a Vitamin D deficiency and that was a regular test I would get every so often in the States, sort of CYA in the case of my general practitioner back there who didn't believe in that, or opioid induced hyperalgesia for that matter. So after the patient has tried everything, opioid-stingy doctors or those under pressure from management or regulators will propose that one, the other, or both is what is happening. Often these two things are brought up when tolerance is the real issue, and it comes up

Pseudo-addiction is very sensible "drug seeking behaviour" when a patient is in pain and knows or have at least a vague idea of what will help them.

I have known people who do slow down or even slightly reverse tolerance to narcotics with low doses of naltrexone on a fixed schedule, including people with physical dependence on things like hydromorphone, smack, morphine and so on. So it definitely seems to work, and I am inclined to support the endorphin theory for this and other things involving the nervous system -- perhaps metabolism of naltrexone leads to formation of metabolites with some agonist activity, especially one which may hit some of the opioid receptors which have been suspected to exist and are still the subject of research (after all, there are the Opioid-Like Receptor and a fourth official opioid receptor, the ζ opioid receptor, found more recently, and there are effects on opioids from NMDA, nociception and others aside from the official opioid receptors). It could also be that, like nalorphine (Nalline) an antagonist and antidote which used to be used in the same fashion naloxone is now (nalorphine is to morphine as naloxone is to oxymorphone) naltrexone actually could have agonist effects as well . . . nalorphine used to be used for analgesia on patients for acute pain in cases where it will not be necessary to maintain a patient on strong analgesics, and it was listed under controlled substances laws various places.
 
Last edited:
1. People have been certainly able to do things such as that, with hydromorphone, smack, and morphine. The one hydromorphone case that comes to mind involved someone who took naltrexone two times a week on a dose I cannot remember exactly.

2. Given that people have used it as I mention in (1) would point to it being possible to also do so on kratom, though there is less knowledge about kratom so far as there is about morphine

3. The effect in the cases of alcoholism make me think that the theory that naltrexone prompts the body to make more endorphins has something to it. So I am inclined to conclude that there is not an actual literal alcohol blocking effect taking place. The two other drugs used for alcoholism are disulfram, which changes the metabolism of alcohol, and ketamine, which has an anaesthetic effect, so ketamine also does not literally block alcohol. The prn drugs for anxiety and insomnia in recovering alcoholics are clomethiazole, diazepam, and phenobarbitone, and at one point there were scientists proposing looking at methaqualone again for this purpose as well as sodium oxybate (Georgia Home Boy, Grievous Bodily Harm) - all of those impact the Gaba system but I don't think there is a literal blocking of alcohol in the CNS going on, there is dopamine reuptake inhibition or release, and various Gaba effects. Meprobamate, carisoprodol, and tripelennamine, to mention just three, can also help folks out at night.

As far a drinking on naltrexone, so many things are caused or prevented by metabolism of alcohol that it is not possible to say with certainty, also with oral dosing of naltrexone it will modify the Liberation, Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism & Elimination profile which could be good or not. Like the kind of dose dumping that got extended-release hydromorphone withdrawn from the market in the United States is one possibility, and getting more naltrexone than was intended is not the best idea.

4. Avoiding precipitated withdrawal is going to be on the order of days, up to a week it sounds like and . . .

5. The washout period for naltrexone in such a case could be 6-14 days depending on a number of things like other drugs being taken, individual metabolism, and narcotic use history

6. I know that naltrexone is being investigated for this purpose and I tend to think it is the endorphin effects . . . the buprenorphine-samidorphan mixture researched for anti-depressant efficacy probably works the same way.

7. Naltrexone will lower or more or less eliminate any opioid tolerance you may have, which is very important to keep in mind when going back to Kratom or narcotic analgesics.

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia is, according to the theory being batted around, that after some point opioids make people more sensitive to pain and may cause some sort of pain, especially in the muscles. I hear of a lot of people being told they may have it when they report that their dose of narcotics is not working like it used to -- so the patient may have better results with little or no narcotics. We all know about tolerance and it can be demonstrated, so tapering someone down or off narcotics -- how on God's Green Earth will that make a positive difference? Cases like that usually call for opioid rotation not cessation, such as replacing morphine with ketobemidone, piritramide, methadone, or another chemically dissimilar medication, and/or the introduction or changing of adjuncts and atypical analgesics like hydroxyzine, nefopam, and dozens of others. So opioid-induced hyperalgesia is a political tool for doctors who are being threatened by regulators or are just ignorant.

I have also heard the theory that chronic pain may be caused or exacerbated by a Vitamin D deficiency and that was a regular test I would get every so often in the States, sort of CYA in the case of my general practitioner back there who didn't believe in that, or opioid induced hyperalgesia for that matter. So after the patient has tried everything, opioid-stingy doctors or those under pressure from management or regulators will propose that one, the other, or both is what is happening. Often these two things are brought up when tolerance is the real issue, and it comes up

Pseudo-addiction is very sensible "drug seeking behaviour" when a patient is in pain and knows or have at least a vague idea of what will help them.

I have known people who do slow down or even slightly reverse tolerance to narcotics with low doses of naltrexone on a fixed schedule, including people with physical dependence on things like hydromorphone, smack, morphine and so on. So it definitely seems to work, and I am inclined to support the endorphin theory for this and other things involving the nervous system -- perhaps metabolism of naltrexone leads to formation of metabolites with some agonist activity, especially one which may hit some of the opioid receptors which have been suspected to exist and are still the subject of research (after all, there are the Opioid-Like Receptor and a fourth official opioid receptor, the ζ opioid receptor, found more recently, and there are effects on opioids from NMDA, nociception and others aside from the official opioid receptors). It could also be that, like nalorphine (Nalline) an antagonist and antidote which used to be used in the same fashion naloxone is now (nalorphine is to morphine as naloxone is to oxymorphone) naltrexone, has agonist effects as well . . . nalorphine used to be used for analgesia on patients for acute pain in cases where it will not be necessary to maintain a patient on strong analgesics, and it was listed under controlled substances laws various places.
Hey Im a new user but have been a reader for ages...I would like to consider myself relatively well versed in pharmacology since I have a medical degree all be it didnt last long in the field due to a bad motorbike accident and I tend to agree with you in regards to Opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Most of the case studys I have read where sucsess in either living standards or pain levels have been reported can all almost be explained as psychological not in the simple sense that opiods made someone crazy but in the sense that if you go to your Dr and report increased pain levels either acute flairs or exacerbated chronic levels and you are told you have this condition and are taken of opiods even if you experience better pain levels post cessation this cannot just be considered an automatic confirmation of OIH there are many other reasons for such a reaction including psychological and many more. It will be interesting to see a study that moniters pain levels and quality of life for extended amounts of time and really considers other explanations such as (did the patient really need to be on opiods anyway) (could there be a placebo effect) (other psychological factors) to be clear I have no doubt that some people who are recreational users or heavily addicted may experiance increased pain in a withdrawal setting as the brain desperately tries to make you believe you need opiods. However in a chronic pain setting this imo should be seen as a clear indication that the dose is to low and the patient either needs a raise or to trial another opiod. Put it this way in an acute setting (broken leg for example, if you are reporting increased pain levels your dosage would be lifted immediately in 99 percent of cases. So to be blunt it really is fucking disgusting that alot of doctors treat chronic pain patients simply as drug addicts. In a medical society that is so heavily against opiods at the moment. I will need to see some more trials and information completed before I form the opinion that OIH is affecting all these people. To be extremely blunt OIH imo is something pain specialists created to cover their own asses and GPs ran with it and hoped the patient would either be to stupid to understand the research or just blindly accept without doing any research. P.s I must say you are extremely well versed in pharmacology do you have a degree? If you dont you definitely should be able to to get one without any study haha
 
If we legalize all substances then we would have a better chance. But even if withdrawal would be avoidable that is not hardest part of stopping opioids. We should have more interest why addiction develops. My opinion is that it stems from early environment that was lacking in some way so genes were expressed accordingly. I firmly believe that addiction can be solved only on a social level with people living in world where they feel connected and cared for. Genes do play a roll but my hunch is that environment is more important because it can make genes dormant or expressed. But I am not expert on that field so it is only my uneducated guess.

But to get to your original question, I think it is probable if all can be researched and applied.

Peace!
Soma

Edit due to spell correct and additional info.

Yes there are experiments which back your theory. They've only been done on rats, mind, so this is far from infallible data, but still it is scientific research.

This video explains it pretty well, pretty sure it's been posted on BL before as it went viral when it was new:



I don't think it holds in absolutely all cases, but certainly it's a huge element in most of them. People are more likely to turn to drugs for comfort if they feel disconnected from the people and world around them. It's also interesting to note (as the video does) that the vast majority of people given pure pharma diamorphine in hospital do not become junkies which is certainly strong support for the theory with data on actual humans to back it up. It shows at the very least that it's not that the drug itself magically causes addiction, but rather the mental state of the individual taking the drug is what matters most.

To answer the OP, ibogaine does indeed stop physical withdrawals but it's nothing to take lightly. For long-term stuff like working out the underlying psychological issues that drive you to addiction in the first place, I think any psychedelic like LSD or shrooms can help greatly for some deep introspection.
 
Hey Im a new user but have been a reader for ages...I would like to consider myself relatively well versed in pharmacology since I have a medical degree all be it didnt last long in the field due to a bad motorbike accident and I tend to agree with you in regards to Opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Most of the case studys I have read where sucsess in either living standards or pain levels have been reported can all almost be explained as psychological not in the simple sense that opiods made someone crazy but in the sense that if you go to your Dr and report increased pain levels either acute flairs or exacerbated chronic levels and you are told you have this condition and are taken of opiods even if you experience better pain levels post cessation this cannot just be considered an automatic confirmation of OIH there are many other reasons for such a reaction including psychological and many more. It will be interesting to see a study that moniters pain levels and quality of life for extended amounts of time and really considers other explanations such as (did the patient really need to be on opiods anyway) (could there be a placebo effect) (other psychological factors) to be clear I have no doubt that some people who are recreational users or heavily addicted may experiance increased pain in a withdrawal setting as the brain desperately tries to make you believe you need opiods. However in a chronic pain setting this imo should be seen as a clear indication that the dose is to low and the patient either needs a raise or to trial another opiod. Put it this way in an acute setting (broken leg for example, if you are reporting increased pain levels your dosage would be lifted immediately in 99 percent of cases. So to be blunt it really is fucking disgusting that alot of doctors treat chronic pain patients simply as drug addicts. In a medical society that is so heavily against opiods at the moment. I will need to see some more trials and information completed before I form the opinion that OIH is affecting all these people. To be extremely blunt OIH imo is something pain specialists created to cover their own asses and GPs ran with it and hoped the patient would either be to stupid to understand the research or just blindly accept without doing any research. P.s I must say you are extremely well versed in pharmacology do you have a degree? If you dont you definitely should be able to to get one without any study haha

About opioid-induced hyperalgesia, there is also the possibility that any increase in pain level and the pain becoming much more intractable may come from elsewhere and does not involve opioid receptors, making the name of the whole syndrome inaccurate. The very good results which doctors have had using levorphanol for cases in which OIH is suspected may point to the increase and modification of analgesia. Levorphanol appears to be an option of using the anti-nociceptive, NMDA, σ, and possibly other effects to help in cases like nerve pain, fibromyalgia, and other hard to treat pain, without the neurotoxicity and QT lengthening effects caused by the dextromethadone which are present in racaemic methadone, with the much stronger opioid agonist levomethadone being used for pain and offered as a possibility for detoxification and maintenance; the most common trade name is Polamidon(e) and is used like this in Switzerland, Austria, and Germany, with other countries also having access to levomethadone for analgesic use but not yet used for detoxification and maintenance.

Doctors in the States are also apparently being pressured in various jurisdictions to quite literally treat chronic pain like narcotic addicts, this by suggesting, nudging, or pushing them on to Suboxone, buprenorphine-only formulations, and methadone . . . I hope people are not doing this if they have any choice in the matter, because having Suboxone in particular on one's record is going to store up all manner of trouble should that chronic pain cause being a life-long thing, which it is in many cases. A new doctor, is, like most of humankind, prone to laziness and will not want to dig through a file and find dictation notes on a given patient's medical history, so unless they are unusually conscientious and diligent about it, the doctors will take the path of least resistance which is to assume that a chronic patient who was on Suboxone now and in the past is a drug seeker and addict. Damn right patients with under-treated or poorly managed pain are drug seekers -- they know there is something which can help, so they are also X-Ray seekers, MRI seekers, chiropractic seekers, physiotherapy seekers . . .

As I have noted here before, countries with saner policies on this kind of thing are adding several pharmaceutical opioids to the options available to Opioid Substitution Therapy people, with dihydrocodeine and morphine extended-release tablets and slow-release tramadol for maintenance cases, as well as slow-release hydromorphone, tramadol, propoxyphene, and codeine available for such use, and in some cases prescribing smack and/or allowing for supervised injection, and in some locales allowing for use of morphine and/or hydromorphone for the same IV/IM/SC administration.
 
Last edited:
As I have noted here before, countries with saner policies on this kind of thing are adding several pharmaceutical opioids to the options available to Opioid Substitution Therapy people, with dihydrocodeine and morphine extended-release tablets and slow-release tramadol for maintenance cases, as well as slow-release hydromorphone, tramadol, propoxyphene, and codeine available for such use, and in some cases prescribing smack and/or allowing for supervised injection, and in some locales allowing for use of morphine and/or hydromorphone for the same IV/IM/SC administration.

In the UK, while it's not as popular as it once was, dihydrocodeine for opioid substitution exists on the NHS and privately, while oral morphine and other less conventional options are offered by private addiction clinics.

What we don't have anymore, ironically since we pioneered it in the first place, is diamorphine substitution. Nordic countries in particular are finding great success with this approach, but it was stopped in the UK for political reasons as we switched to the US model of methadone treatment.
 
In the UK, while it's not as popular as it once was, dihydrocodeine for opioid substitution exists on the NHS and privately, while oral morphine and other less conventional options are offered by private addiction clinics.

What we don't have anymore, ironically since we pioneered it in the first place, is diamorphine substitution. Nordic countries in particular are finding great success with this approach, but it was stopped in the UK for political reasons as we switched to the US model of methadone treatment.

Are there any of the private Diconal addiction clinics still in operation? It sounds like they had a bespoke dipipanone linctus and possibly one with dipipanone and cyclizine as well, and they could opt for other substitutes as well . . .
 
Are there any of the private Diconal addiction clinics still in operation? It sounds like they had a bespoke dipipanone linctus and possibly one with dipipanone and cyclizine as well, and they could opt for other substitutes as well . . .

Not that I know of. Diconal is technically still available but in practice it's rarely ever prescribed today.
 
Not that I know of. Diconal is technically still available but in practice it's rarely ever prescribed today.

When people speak of cravings and temptation breaking through on other substitutes, I am thinking that PO dipanone (or phenadoxone, its closest relative) + cyclizine + tripelennamine and supervising injecting of said mixture would be helpful, with an SL variant mixing most of the advantages of both, and dextromoramide also being useful -- and research is ongoing about that. This, of course, on top of long-acting narcotics like slow-release morphine or methadone. Were I in such a situation, I would want the 8-12 hour tablets of morphine, like Vendal/MST Continus/MS Contin, immediate-release tablets for PO or SL administration, and injectable morphine along with tripelennamine and orphenadrine which I could mix into an incrementation upon Blue Velvet when needed.

Since there are so many different ways different people come into narcotic addiction with different substances involved, it would seem to me that a lot of progress is made just by breaking the cycle of needing connexion with the clandestine resale market in drugs, and why not just give them their drug of choice in the healthiest possible way, such as getting people to turn away from shooting pills and seeing if there is a degree of needle fixation which is beyond what seems justified by the pharmacology of the drugs in question. If there is a scientific justification for it, then make sure they have plenty of sterile equipment and the best possible injection technique. If people want to kvetch about it being the substitution of one addiction for another, the response should simply be "mind yer own fucken business"
 
I'm also wondering how much genetics plays a role in addiction. Both my parents were at one point heavy users--I mean HEAVY in their early 20s to their 30s. My mother preferred opiates (and only opiates) and my father cocaine and alcohol. I definitely did not inherit his side as I despise both of his drugs of choice.

I don't recall any form of depression before my using, and maybe perhaps anxiety but nothing clinically worthy of treatment. But I can definitely assert that depression and anxiety were not my motivation for seeking out substances. I was a relatively happy and stimulated guy. For me it felt like the inability to avoid the pleasures of using over needing substances to compensate for something I was inherently lacking. I still can't explain my addictions other than lacking self control when I know something around me will make me feel very good despite consequences.
 
It's probably possible, I'm thinking about ;
1. enkephaline and endorphine reuptake inhibitor.

2. An enzyme inhibitor responsible for the breakdown of endogenous opioids.

3. And there's already Clonidine that actually help alot.

4. Alcohol ease it too.

5. Stimulant like Amphetamine also work but it's not a everyone thing.
 
Top