• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

California To Vote On Legalizing Recreational Marijuana

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
California To Vote On Legalizing Recreational Marijuana

gettyimages-542220938_custom-f5f04c4a0bc8e3c581e1ecbed23fd91f840b0fa9-s800-c85.jpg


Voters in California will decide this November whether to legalize the use of recreational marijuana in the nation's most populous state.

California's secretary of state announced Tuesday that the measure had obtained enough signatures to be placed on the ballot. Its supporters have raised $3.53 million, The Sacramento Bee reports — nearly 31 times more than what opponents have raised.

Kurt Britz checks a driver's license at the 3-D Denver Discrete Dispensary on Jan. 1, 2014, the first day recreational marijuana sales were legal in Colorado. Possession remains illegal for those under 21 years old, and statistics show a widening racial gap in arrests for those offenses.

The initiative would allow adults age 21 and older to possess, transport and purchase up to an ounce of marijuana and grow up to six plants for recreational use.

"Today marks a fresh start for California, as we prepare to replace the costly, harmful and ineffective system of prohibition with a safe, legal and responsible adult-use marijuana system that gets it right and completely pays for itself," Jason Kinney, spokesman for the Adult Use of Marijuana Act, said in a statement.

In Oregon, people can grow up to four marijuana plants per household.

Should the initiative be approved by voters, the reduced costs to local and state governments for enforcing marijuana-related laws could exceed $100 million annually, according to the statement from the secretary of state. Likewise, annual state and local tax revenues from the production and sale of marijuana could reach more than $1 billion — which would primarily "be required to be spent for specific purposes such as substance use disorder education, prevention and treatment."

Supporters of the initiative include the California Democratic Party, California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, the California NAACP and the ACLU of California. Former Facebook President Sean Parker has provided "major financial backing," according to the Bee.

Voters rejected a similar measure, Proposition 19, by a narrow margin in 2010. But as the Los Angeles Times reports, advocates "say the new measure has a better chance because it adds more regulation at the state level rather than letting locals dictate what happens, and comes after the state has approved a regulatory system for medical marijuana growing, transportation and sales."

And since the 2010 vote, several other western states have legalized recreational marijuana use. "This is six years later. We've already seen legalization pass and be successful in other states. So it's a different world in talking about his issue than it was," Taylor West, deputy director of the National Cannabis Industry Association, tells the Times.

In 1996, California was the first state to legalize marijuana for medical use.

Opponents to the November ballot measure include the "California Republican Party, the Teamsters Union and groups representing police chiefs and hospitals," The Associated Press writes.

"The dangers of marijuana are pretty clear in terms of motorist safety, criminal activity, impacts on society," Cory Salzillo, legislative director of the California State Sheriffs' Association, tells the wire service. "We don't believe that decriminalization will upend the black market."

As the Bee reports, "driving while impaired would still be illegal" should the measure pass. Marijuana businesses would be prohibited within 600 feet of schools, and "cannabis products could not be marketed to kids or easily confused with candy."

Recent polls show that Californians support marijuana legalization. According to a poll conducted last month by the Public Policy Institute of California, "a majority (60%) of likely voters say that, in general, marijuana use should be legal, and 37 percent say it should not be legal."

With comments -
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...-to-vote-on-legalizing-recreational-marijuana
 
To all you Cannabis Sativa and/or Indica-consuming Bluelighters who reside in CA, I sincerely hope you become the next state to legalize that which should have never been made illegal in America of all places.

"The dangers of marijuana are pretty clear in terms of motorist safety, criminal activity, impacts on society," Cory Salzillo, legislative director of the California State Sheriffs' Association, tells the wire service.


Incorrect.

What is abundantly clear is that you pricks are shaking in fear that your cash cow will be taken away from ya, and you're grasping at straws in desperation. Straws of the lobbying variety, among others.

Go do some real police work for a change. Ya know... like, as in a crime committed in which someone was actually victimized? Apparently rape kits are piling up because there's no money on the side for that kind of productive work in your abusive interpretation of the law.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately you're right about the fact it should have never been made illegal in the first place - but making it completely legal for recreational use is not neccessarily something I think would be right. Not after the fact (which once again, is unfortunate but it's what happened).

We have to much time invested into the chemistry of THC and synthetic variations. Just my 2cents.
 
As a medical cannabis patient in California, I'm pretty close to coming out AGAINST this initiative.

It has some serious issues in it which increase costs for medical patients. They could have gone the other way that. Advocates were not given a real seat at the table--this is a money grab.
 
I would like to see marijuana not corporatized. If we corporatize it individual growers will be like moonshiners. That is the wrong direction. It should be a boutique industry that has nothing to do with the medical aspect of it...the medical aspect should be kept the way it is...it works.
 
Unfortunately you're right about the fact it should have never been made illegal in the first place - but making it completely legal for recreational use is not neccessarily something I think would be right. Not after the fact (which once again, is unfortunate but it's what happened).

We have to much time invested into the chemistry of THC and synthetic variations. Just my 2cents.

It's no secret that I really wanna see drug prohibition come to an end, the sooner the better. But at the same time, I feel it would be prudent to not veer off too far to the left.

Now, what do I mean by that? Well, for example, there is apparently some noteworthy evidence that exposure to THC can be harmful for adolescents. Therefore, planned regulation for recreational use should include an age limit.

At the same time, I can see the same twits who've been lobbying to keep weed illegal also lobbying to corporatize it to the point where we could end up with a monopoly on our hands, should it be legalized.

God I hope that we don't reach that coveted milestone where it's taken off of the list of Scheduled Drugs only to end up in the lap of some insidious conglomerate. Boy would that leave a bitter taste in my mouth :p
 
Do the dipshits that write this stuff even realize how much grows on one plant? 6 plants but one ounce?
 
Do the dipshits that write this stuff even realize how much grows on one plant? 6 plants but one ounce?

I believe it stipulates in the proposition that you can have the product of those 6 plants. At your home. But you're not allowed to transport more than 1 ounce.

Or something like that. Goddam thing is 60+ pages long. Maybe that's why it's Proposition 64--64 pages long.

Big cannabis groups in California are starting to come out against it. It's going to be an interesting election season.
 
Top