it isnt based on my personal opinion at all, the staff at a residential rehab i was at had read an article stating that there is a very poor success rate when it comes to clinical treatment, ill be fucking glad to look it up or call my former counselor for the article. Try this: go into a long term rehab, and see how many people get kicked out, how many people relapse, or how many people are faking there asses off just to get out of clinical treatment. you will be shocked and probably saddened at how many people get unsuccessfully discharged from long term tretment. OR how about this, go to outpatient drug counseling, and see how many people are failing drug tests, skipping groups, rescheduling one on one appts to avoid a piss test, and see how many people just drop out of the program. clinical treatment has a huge problem: majority of the people in it clearly just dont want to fucking be clean, and its sad how unsucessful these programs are, i been thru it myself, and seen it myself, which obviously reports have been written and articles have been popping up. But when you go into an AA/NA meeting (which is completely voluntary) you will see such a beautiful vibe in the room, and all the positive energy. ill let you know straight up if this is my opinion, as in ALL MY OTHER THREADS IF YOU HAVENT NOTICED I ALWAYS STATE "IMO" IN MY OPINION, OR IME "IN MY EXPERIENCE" go ahead, i do it in many many threads, not this one however. i will find documentation stating clinical treatment has been at a huge decline in success rates. or how about this go look it up for yourself since your so positive about me being wrong. lets not ignore the issue clinical treatment has done a poor job in keeping people sober, sure it has kept many sober, but when you add up all the successfulls and unsuccessfuls, it tends to weigh down on unsucessful, and that is a FACT.
I'm guessing you went to a 12 step treatment facility? It sounds to me that it still is a personal opinion, the personal opinion of the staff at the rehab facility.
I would love to see the paper you are referring to, if you can get a link it would be great, however, I'm not asking you to especially contact your old counsellor.
I know loads of treatment professions from all type of different trainings, who would not agree with that, but again what I'm stating is just opinion.
Now with saying that I actually have a lot of time for 12 step treatment, it has helped so many people world wide, but it is very important to note that it is only one form of treatment that works well for those who tolerate it, very well indeed. However, it is not a suitable treatment format for many people and if it is forced upon people who are not suited to it; well it can be fucking dangerous.
You talk about people failing in clinical treatment and that when you go to a fellowship meeting you get a beautiful vibe, in some cases maybe. However, I have seen many people drop out of fellowships for similar reasons to people dropping out of treatment.
Sadly, it has been pushed upon many people over the years, however, here it is important to note that it is not the programme forcing itself on unsuitable people, it is badly trained treatment professionals, or other professional.
The consensus of Project Match was that when people enter treatment a third get better, a third stay the same and a third get worse. However, for things like this definitions need to be soild, what is treatment? What does getting better mean? How does we measure that? However, I'm going off topic here.
My point was that 12 step treatment [here I'm limiting that to fellowship meeting and the work that develops from that I do not include therapeutic techniques such "12 step facilitation"] generally receives poor outcomes in the treatment literature. However, I think it is only fair to acknowledge that fellowships for many reasons are difficult to research thoroughly and I'm not sure if it is fair to compare them to clinic treatments. Clinical treatments are profession interventions, fellowship meetings are part of a personal programme. Can we compare the two of them? If we can then surely we should compare fellowships to different treatment modalities individually, as there is certainly no one clear treatment format, that we can compare it to.
I hope the above makes some sense.