But your arguement, Velocide, relies on the axiom that it is wrong to stop people taking drugs. Now while I don't think I could be bothered playing devils advocate in that arguement, my point from the begining (in the front page forum) still stands: That the arguements used in the original article are specious. As far as anti-drug stratagies go, that one is preety damn good. Now if you think all anti-drug stratagies are wrong, then of course you think this is wrong, and even more wrong than most, because it could be so damn effective. But any arguements in this thread, that so far have tried to pin a somewhat objective negation on the "childhood drug immunisation" plan, have failed. At least in my opinion.