• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: swilow | Vagabond696

Acons lack of action at the looming pandemic of HIV infection in Sydney

No Raz, u are right on track. Its just so shit, there is no sence of community and its so dog eat dog. I can't help but think if there was a place for gay men to socialise that wasn't connected with drugs, a place where the young could benifet from the older guys experience rather than deriding them and and the older guys getting a chance to really mix and be part of younger guys lives rather than praying on them which does happen.

I have this image in my head of like a gay town hall or something in taylor square. Its stupid I know, but even though everyone is together...we are all so alone.

Oh and in a sex on premises venue not only do you often not talk, but I would say it is inappropriate to talk :)
 
Wow, where do I start...

HIV is an issue that is very close to my heart. I have had many close friends die from it, some that are still infected and I constantly used to worry about a friend of mine who was going out & sleeping with randoms every night.

I've seen guys at Pride literally meet & start fucking on the dancefloor, and no straight party I have ever been to has had a sex room like many of the gay parties I have attended. This would be a very rare, if not non existant issue at a straight club and I am still at odds to work out exactly why guys at gay clubs feel the need to fuck, suck and do other things that should be left in the bedroom in public toilets, saunas etc. Perhaps it's all about exhibitionisim, perhaps they have partners at home - I don't know.

Bug chasers, and infectors also worry me and although these are stereotypically gay males there are straight people who do this on purpose too. Places like on sex premises should be banned. No if's, and's or but's - they are breeding grounds for disease - in my eyes should be banned because they encourage predators to infect the innocent.

SS: I completely hear where you are coming from, and completely support your views however I have to agree with some of the posts in here that state that the premises don't really have a responsibility. Arq, Stonewall, the Shift etc all have strict no drug policies (and yes, this is highly laughable given the amount of drugs that are consumed in them) and they are reasonably powerless to control what their patrons do, short of having sniffer dogs at the entrance every night. When people are on drugs they do lose their inhibitions but I know personally that no matter how fucked up I have been I have NEVER EVER put myself in a situation where I have been so high that I have wanted to have sex with a random, and even more so unprotected sex.

While I also understand your point about 18 year olds coming into the scene and being "naive", people have to take responsibility for their actions. People can't blame their actions on drugs or alcohol - it just doesn't cut it. If you can't handle yourself then don't do it, or do it less. I've met plenty of 18 year old country boys who have come to the city to be accepted for their sexual choices and they haven't been dickheads about it, they haven't screwed everything and anything and been so high that they haven't remembered how to put a condom on... I realise that there are guys out there like this, but that's their choice. No one is forcing them to go out, get high & have unprotected sex with a random.
 
electreauxbella said:
I've seen guys at Pride literally meet & start fucking on the dancefloor, and no straight party I have ever been to has had a sex room like many of the gay parties I have attended. This would be a very rare, if not non existant issue at a straight club and I am still at odds to work out exactly why guys at gay clubs feel the need to fuck, suck and do other things that should be left in the bedroom in public toilets, saunas etc. Perhaps it's all about exhibitionisim, perhaps they have partners at home - I don't know.
It's a lot of things. It's cultural sexual repression, having it constantly reinforced that gay = wrong, and so when we find a place where that isn't the case, we go a bit crazy.

It's because of social conditioning that it's a big no-no for women to be sexually aggressive whereas men are expected to be.

It's that a lot of men don't consider themselves gay, are homophobic themselves because of the way they have been raised, and so they can only have sex in saunas, public toilets etc where they don't have to worry about anyone finding out. When I first came out 12 years ago, I didn't go to gay clubs and I had no idea sex-on-premises venues even existed. The only way I got sex pretty much was by using public toilets and meeting guys in parks, that kind of thing....I got over it once I realised there were other options that were safer for me and more respectful to both myself and the general public, but a lot of guys don't ever get that realisation.
Places like on sex premises should be banned. No if's, and's or but's - they are breeding grounds for disease - in my eyes should be banned because they encourage predators to infect the innocent.
I disagree. I think they should be forced to create a safer environment but there's no reason they shouldn't exist. Like I said before, guys who are obviously drunk/drug-fucked shouldn't be allowed entry...there's one place in Collingwood where they have a bar actually inside the venue and I think that's ridiculously irresponsible. They also shouldn't show bareback porn at these places.

Historically though the reason that sex-on-premises venues exist is because they are a safe place for men to meet other men. You ban sex-on-premises venues and I guarantee you're going to get a lot more sex in public places where condoms aren't handed out at the door, you're going to have a massive chunk of the community who will lose the only access they have to information on safe sex, and you're going to get more gay bashings and more problems with depression and anxiety because it'll mean one less place we can go to be normal.
I know personally that no matter how fucked up I have been I have NEVER EVER put myself in a situation where I have been so high that I have wanted to have sex with a random, and even more so unprotected sex.
Fair enough. When your family realised you liked men, did they warn you not to prey on your younger brothers/nephews/cousins? Did they kick you out of home and refuse to answer any of your calls? When people see you with your partner, do they assume that you're retarded and he's your carer, or that you must have been sexually abused as a child to be an openly heterosexual person as an adult? When's the last time you were physically attacked in the street, just because someone even suspected you might be heterosexual?

From the minute you're old enough to understand the meaning of the word, it's drilled into your brain that being gay is wrong. FFS, one of my best friends in the world argues vehemently that gay couples shouldn't be allowed to raise children, and this is someone I know has the utmost respect for me otherwise. But gay people just aren't worth what straight people are in most of the world's eyes.

Given that, do you think you might be able to understand why gay men choose affection over safety when we've been raised to think that we're not worth keeping safe in the first place?
While I also understand your point about 18 year olds coming into the scene and being "naive", people have to take responsibility for their actions. People can't blame their actions on drugs or alcohol - it just doesn't cut it. If you can't handle yourself then don't do it, or do it less. I've met plenty of 18 year old country boys who have come to the city to be accepted for their sexual choices and they haven't been dickheads about it, they haven't screwed everything and anything and been so high that they haven't remembered how to put a condom on... I realise that there are guys out there like this, but that's their choice. No one is forcing them to go out, get high & have unprotected sex with a random.
I totally agree with you that people ultimately take responsibility for their own choices. Unless you've been raped, you're the one who chose to have unsafe sex. Nobody is suggesting it's anyone else's fault...but what's wrong with asking for the community which gleefully profits from our bad choices to help us make the right choice for a change?
 
^I second that.

From a public health perspective, we know that just providing people with education isn't enough. If we want to empower people to make healthy choices (encompassing physical, mental and social aspects of health), we need to make some structural changes too.

So advocating for sex-on-premises establishments to make it easier for people to practise safer sex is definitely a good idea.
 
why not abolish sex-on-premises establishments since it's apparent that such a large proportion of such a small minority aren't able to exercise basic common sense?
 
^^ Because then they end up in public places like parks, public toilets etc.
 
great
so sex-on-premises establishments to homosexuals are like prisons to criminals
can't have them running rampant in public!
excellent logic there THR
 
The logic is fine. It is your ability to comprehend that is not. It's like prohibition - it doesn't solve the problem, it just drives it underground. While sex-on-premises establishments aren't perfect, they're undeniably better than the alternative of beats etc.

So fuck your logic, because you never have any.
 
Top